Originally Posted by
doug3030
The punishment should be determined by the law, not some self-styled, old, disabled vigilante with a pocket-full of tek screws.
I am sure Mutawintji believed that it was a calculated risk to park in the disabled spot, and one taken in the knowledge that there were six spots vacant so no disabled person would be disadvantaged. While what he did was technically wrong, who is the victim of his actions? Nobody was inconvenienced but him.
Even if he had taken the last spot, it is wrong for someone to take the law into their own hands and disable his vehicle. In fact you have to wonder about the mentality of the person who was so offended that he had parked in one of many vacant spots that they disabled his vehicle, thereby preventing him from vacating the valuable resource for a considerably longer period of time.
Doug