Thanks: 0
Likes: 0
Needs Pictures: 0
Picture(s) thanks: 0
Results 1 to 15 of 44
Thread: Which First Plane?
-
1st January 2011, 06:47 AM #1New Member
- Join Date
- Dec 2008
- Location
- Atlantic, Iowa, USA
- Posts
- 6
Which First Plane?
My daughter has requested a new plane for her birthday in March. I asked her what type or some idea of future woodworking projects - with the reply. "One never knows what Krafty Krummel will make next". Her biggest job so far is a coffee table trunk, with three folding lids and one lower draw. It's made from old barn wood from her husbands family farm.Very dark stain and satin varnish finish it off. The only plane she has used is my fathers 4 1/2" U.K. Stanley. (she prefers a brand new plane I think)
Regards,
Nigel.
-
1st January 2011 06:47 AM # ADSGoogle Adsense Advertisement
- Join Date
- Always
- Location
- Advertising world
- Posts
- Many
-
1st January 2011, 07:02 AM #2Hewer of wood
- Join Date
- Jan 2002
- Location
- Melbourne, Aus.
- Age
- 71
- Posts
- 12,746
Welcome to the forum Nigel.
I'd recommend a Veritas bevel-up Jack plane.
The blade back is flat from the factory; you can get blades in A2 steel and keep one or two at different bevel angles to suit different applications.Cheers, Ern
-
1st January 2011, 07:03 AM #3
I would go for a low angle block plane for end grain such as either of the two linked here
Lee Valley Tools - Important Announcement
Lie-Nielsen Toolworks USA | Adjustable Mouth Block Planes
either will be usable right out of the box
other slightly cheaper but still quality option option would be Wood River planes available from Jim Davey a forum member
Jim Davey - Planes and Sharpening - WoodRiver V3 Bench Planes & Blocks
oh just noticed your in the states but you would be able to get wood river there too"All that is necessary for evil to succeed is for good men to do nothing"
(Edmund Burke 1729-1797)
-
1st January 2011, 07:15 AM #4
Hello Nigel and Happy New Year to you.
Traditionally a number 5 sized plane has been a good starting point for a first plane. I think that this old advice was based on the fact that jack planes were used a lot in surface preparation before smoothing later. These days most of our timber (lumber for you Yanks) comes fairly well prepared and usually only requires smoothing.
There are still times when some preparation is needed before smoothing however.
I agree with Ern, I think a low angle jack (LAJ) plane would be a good choice. These new planes come with an adjustable mouth and they have the ability to take blades with different bevels to help in working different woods.
My suggestion would be a Veritas LAJ would be a good purchase. If some further smoothing is needed she can always use the 4-1/2 to finish tricky spots, but this probably won't be necessary.
Cheers
SG.... some old things are lovely
Warm still with the life of forgotten men who made them ........................D.H. Lawrence
-
1st January 2011, 10:19 AM #5
Welcome to the forum Nigel
I purchased a Veritas bevel up jack plane about 6 months ago and it is everything the other forum members say about it!!! The ability to open and close the mouth is a definite plus in my book
It is a pleasure to use
-
1st January 2011, 10:20 AM #6"One never knows what Krafty Krummel will make next".
A block plane gets my vote, it's the plane I use most, very handy.....trimming edges etc...if someone was to give me any LN or Veritas version of a block plane, I'd be very pleased indeed.
We don't know how lucky we are......
-
1st January 2011, 10:24 AM #7
Veritas LAJ with all three blades. Can't go wrong. Or the LN LAJ. same deal.
-
1st January 2011, 11:58 AM #8
Predictably.......Veritas BU Jack with a couple of blades sharpened at different angles
Followed by a Veritas block plane of some kind ........I got the DX-60, and love it
Then, if the interest develops, you can buy additional Veritas BU planes (a jointer and a nice heavy smoother) that will take the same blades as your BU Jack.
-
1st January 2011, 12:06 PM #9
Hi Nigel,
What Ern, Scribbly and Claw Hammer said, in my view. The Veritas is quite a versatile plane, can be used on a shooting board for squaring up ends as well.
Cheers
Pops
-
1st January 2011, 04:40 PM #10
I have just had a thought - (I know - don't go there ....) the Veritas LAJ is a fine plane but it does have a rather large handle. Now this is a recommendation of a plane for your daughter and she may have large hands, but she may be not blessed with such. If she has a smaller hand then try the Veritas handle for comfort first. Its handle is very blokey and can be quite a handful - so to speak.
The other recommended LAJ - the Lie Nielsen may be a better fit to her hand.
Both are fine planes.
Cheers
SG.... some old things are lovely
Warm still with the life of forgotten men who made them ........................D.H. Lawrence
-
1st January 2011, 08:23 PM #11
Nigel
You may have to explain "Krafty Krummel" as I have led a sheltered life and it's significance is, I regret, totally lost on me. I am sure everyone else knows and they will question which planet I am from in the very next post or whether I have electricity in my cave.
All that aside it seems to be the general consensus by others on the forum that a Jack plane is the way to go. I recently was given some money by my wife's siblings (there are quite a tribe of them, much too large for a single tent) for what they descibe euphemistically as a "landmark" birthday.
I decided that a timber bodied plane would be really different for me as someone who had a number of steel bodied planes. I had become aware that they perform much better than you might think.
I looked at Terry Gordon's site and decided on a matched pair of ringed gidgee planes as shown below. I purchased the A55 smoothing and the "New" Aussie Jack plane.
If you are interested his site is
HNT Gordon and Co Classic Plane Makers Australia
They are beautifully made. I just can't fault them. The Jack plane is my preference, although I had thought it would be the smoothing plane, and I don't know how I have managed without it up till now.
It is also the easiest plane to adjust that I have ever owned and performs superbly. (No I am not related to Terry Gordon ).
Even though my wife's siblings are sufficiently numerous to populate a small town, I did have to add a little of my own cash to supplement the cost.
Seeing how this is to be a present for your daughter perhaps it would appropriate to find something a little exotic. They are to my mind almost sculptural in their form as well as practical. It is something that particularly appeals to me.
Having said that, any of the Lie Nielsen or veritas planes I am sure would also be very well received. My wife in fact bought me a Lie Nielsen for this same birthday. Everything is now plane sailing in our household.
Also you may have specialist plane makers in the states, who are producing similar quality tools.
Regards
PaulBushmiller;
"Power tends to corrupt. Absolute power corrupts, absolutely!"
-
2nd January 2011, 03:14 AM #12
I too recommend the Low Angle Jack plane. Of the two (Lie-Nielsen or Veritas) the Veritas is a little cheaper and has more features. And get two extra irons (blades) for maximum versatility.
Bushmiller - what lovely looking planes! But I'm not sure the OP (being in the US) needs the 55 degree pitch of the Gordon plane.
Cheers, VannGatherer of rustyplanestools...
Proud member of the Wadkin Blockhead Club .
-
2nd January 2011, 12:08 PM #13
Bushmiller - what lovely looking planes! But I'm not sure the OP (being in the US) needs the 55 degree pitch of the Gordon plane.
Cheers, Vann[/QUOTE]
Vann,
Good point. I really can't speak about the so-called low angle planes as I have never used one let alone owned such a beast. We are about to become sidetracked on to one of the great debates, but rather than become engulfed in that perhaps I could refer Nigel to a previous debate
Low angle vs. High angle Planing
Might have to put that into the search box to bring up the thread.
I suspect that the fundamental problems we have here are we don't know what species of timber Nigel's daughter will be using and we are trying to recommend one plane to suit every situation. Perhaps Nigel can provide some additional details.
In the debate mentioned above Derek Cohen pointed out that even in the same species of timber, grain and plane performance can vary hugely. Clearly, in choosing a single plane, we are looking at a compromise.
Perhaps the single biggest issue is having a sharp blade and a good quality blade. If the plane works it doesn't matter what angle we have.
I had always thought that low angle was only suitable for soft timbers, but reading the the discussion above where they refered to planing cranky grained hardwoods and burls I may have to revise my thinking.
If you go to the HNT Gordon site have a look at the FAQs. I found this one interesting in particular
"Why didn't Stanley or Record make a plane with a 60 degree blade angle?For the exact answer you probably have to ask these companies, but here is my opinion: 45 degrees is the optimum cutting angle for wood in its pure form. E.g. with straight grain. Cutting at 45 degrees also has less of a blunting effect on the blade edge, so in theory this would seem the best angle to use to mass produce a plane. However, in practice this angle is not so effective because timber is rarely the straight grained medium a 45 degree plane was designed to smooth. A higher blade pitch will start to induce an element of scraping which will reduce the likely hood of inducing tear out. Also if you increase the blade pitch to 60 degrees in any plane you also increase the effort required to push the plane through the wood, so combined with the additional fiction of a metal plane it would have made using the plane very hard work."
All interesting reading .
I use my jack plane on our dense Australian hardwoods (some of it old demolition materials) as well as softer building timbers such as meranti and pine.
Regards
PaulBushmiller;
"Power tends to corrupt. Absolute power corrupts, absolutely!"
-
2nd January 2011, 12:19 PM #14
There is a lot of very useful information on Terry Gordon's webpage, whether you use his planes or not
I've had one of the blades on my BU Jack up to a 60° microbevel, giving an effective cutting angle of 72°......I can confirm that it does get VERY hard to push though !
For even crankier grain, when all else fails, I reach for the LV Scraper Plane.
-
2nd January 2011, 08:29 PM #15
My previous post made reference to a debate discussing the virtues of low angle and high angle planes. When I did a search it showed zero results. Having spent a good part of the day on and off I finally found the d****d thing.
Thought I was going mad. Actually that still hasn't been entirely ruled out !
Here is the link, about 5 pages of it. Derek Cohen's coments are very pertinent as are many others. I think at the end of the day, you pick a plane you like, make sure the consensus is that it is a good tool and buy it.
https://www.woodworkforums.com/f152/l...-planing-9300/
Regards
PaulBushmiller;
"Power tends to corrupt. Absolute power corrupts, absolutely!"
Similar Threads
-
Veritas 5-1/4 Bench Plane Vs Low-Angle Jack Plane
By Wolfs in forum HAND TOOLS - UNPOWEREDReplies: 10Last Post: 30th April 2008, 01:43 PM -
Jack plane converted to scrub plane...???
By Greg_stewy in forum HAND TOOLS - UNPOWEREDReplies: 4Last Post: 7th June 2007, 10:59 AM -
LN Skew Block Plane or LV Shoulder Plane
By mat in forum HAND TOOLS - UNPOWEREDReplies: 3Last Post: 25th October 2006, 06:46 PM -
Kudos to Lee Valley- Scrub Plane; and Shoulder plane question
By lyptus in forum HAND TOOLS - UNPOWEREDReplies: 5Last Post: 12th July 2005, 08:07 PM