Thanks: 0
Likes: 0
Needs Pictures: 0
Picture(s) thanks: 0
Results 1 to 15 of 56
-
31st July 2010, 11:13 AM #1Senior Member
- Join Date
- May 2008
- Location
- Vermont, VIC
- Posts
- 238
Bevel Up vs. Bevel Down edge wear
G'day mates,
Sauer & Steiner: up & down - bevels that it
This is an interesting observation from Konrad Sauer regarding bevel up vs bevel down plane blades in use.
I was kinda taken aback by his mention on re-honing and re-grinding of the BU blade, which I quote below,
"So here is my observation based on using these two planes - they both required frequent re- honing, but the blade of the BU block plane required a lot more work to get it to a freshly honed state. I had to re-grind before each honing in order to get rid of the wear to the “back” (the flat side) of the iron which saw more wear than the bevel side. The bevel down blade seemed to have a similar amount of wear to each side and was less effort to re-hone because of it."
Such an observation from one of today's premier plane makers definitely makes it a point to consider when purchasing a new plane.
Most of my planes are woodies and bevel down, so my sharpening/honing method is pretty much the same, as mentioned here HOCK TOOLS -- Sharpening Notes.
My bevel up planes are router and side rebate planes, which are used sparingly, hence, requiring less re-honing.
If anyone using primarily/majority bevel up planes can share their experiences, it is highly appreciated.
Cheers
Gunn
-
31st July 2010 11:13 AM # ADSGoogle Adsense Advertisement
- Join Date
- Always
- Location
- Advertising world
- Posts
- Many
-
31st July 2010, 11:42 AM #2Hewer of wood
- Join Date
- Jan 2002
- Location
- Melbourne, Aus.
- Age
- 71
- Posts
- 12,746
Curious: the flat side of a BU blade wore more than the bevel side?
So the bevel was 34*. What's the bed angle on these LN block planes?
I guess thinking about it there's less edge support on the flat side of a BU blade so it makes sense.Cheers, Ern
-
31st July 2010, 12:30 PM #3Jim
- Join Date
- Feb 2008
- Location
- Victoria
- Posts
- 3,191
Oh dear! This thread could get worse that the politics ones
-
31st July 2010, 12:32 PM #4Novice
- Join Date
- Jul 2009
- Location
- USA
- Posts
- 11
The wear is caused by lack of clearance angle in 12º bedded bevel-up planes. Wood fibers deflect ahead of the cutting edge and spring back when severed. There isn't enough clearance to allow the fibers to return to their position without rubbing on the back of the cutting edge. The more obtuse the bevel angle of the iron, the more deflection and the more spring-back and wear to the back side of the cutting edge. A dull iron will also exacerbate the problem.
The net effect is that this wear needs to be ground away at each sharpening and the edge doesn't last long. This adds considerable effort and labor to restoring a short-lived edge. The "ruler trick" only reduces the clearance angle more and adds to the problem.
-
31st July 2010, 02:52 PM #5Senior Member
- Join Date
- May 2008
- Location
- Vermont, VIC
- Posts
- 238
G'day mate,
Would this be Mr. Larry Williams from 'Clark & Williams'?
Anyway, your explanation is highly appreciated. While I am not planning to purchase any bevel up planes, reading the blog post from Konrad Sauer did intrigue me on the comparisons between bevel up and bevel down planes.
Cheers
Gunn
-
31st July 2010, 03:01 PM #6Banned
- Join Date
- Jun 2007
- Location
- Otautahi , Te Wa'hi Pounamu ( The Mainland) , NZ
- Age
- 69
- Posts
- 2,114
-
31st July 2010, 04:38 PM #7
Read the replies on Konrad's blog.
The point I made there is, while wear is expected to occur on the back of the blade - which is does for both BU and BD blades - the amount of wear that he showed on his LN block plane blade is unusual. I have no explanation, but one simple observation is that if BU plane users all experienced wear like this, they would demand their money back. The unusualness of this wear was what brought Konrad's attention to the blade - keep in mind that he has used this plane for several years and not noticed wear such as this before.
The LN block plane has a 12 degree bed. Larry argues that "The wear is caused by lack of clearance angle in 12º bedded bevel-up planes". I would disagree with this. The wear occurs because wood wears steel when they they come in contact with one another. If it did not do so then we would have ever-lasting sharp blades This is Larry's (frequently cited) criticism of BU planes. Another equally cited reference is that of Leonard Lee (Rob's dad), who wrote that 7 degrees of clearance suffices. That leaves a good margin for error!
The bevel angle of the blade plays no part in this scenario (the article was about the wear on the back of the blade, not the bevel face). However bevel angles are important when one discusses BU versus BD planes. One big advantage of BU planes is the ease with which one may change cutting angles. In Australia, with our timbers that typically feature interlocked grains, the cutting angle is relevant. We benefit from planes with high cutting angles. Witness the popularity of planes such as the HNT Gordon range, which were developed for Australian conditions. The cutting angle becomes less important if you are not working with such timber.
Although there is no proof that BD planes cut for longer that a BU plane (all other factors held constant) that I am aware of, I would not be surprised that it was so. The differences are small enough to go unnoticed by the majority of woodworkers around the world. And even if it was a significant amount, I value the ability of a BU plane to work magic at high cutting angles. So wear is, frankly, academic.
That said, I am presently undertaking a very large research project into bevel wear using different steels (O1, A2, D2, CPM 3V) at different bed angles (12 degrees, 25 degrees and 45 degrees), different bevel angles (25, 35 and 50 degrees), and different cutting configurations (BU versus BD). Results include photos of edges magnified to 400 times. When will this be done? Don't hold your breath - at the earliest several months - as I said it is only of academic interest and I fit such projects (and reviews) in between building stuff. I'll keep you posted.
Regards from Perth
DerekVisit www.inthewoodshop.com for tutorials on constructing handtools, handtool reviews, and my trials and tribulations with furniture builds.
-
31st July 2010, 06:12 PM #8Jim
- Join Date
- Feb 2008
- Location
- Victoria
- Posts
- 3,191
-
31st July 2010, 07:18 PM #9
Didn't two nations go to war over which end of an egg to break?
Can you name the work of fiction in which this occurred?
Out of interest I will look forward eagerly to Derek's review.
I suspect that in the final wash-up there will be differences, but they will be so marginal that they will make little practical difference.
Cheers
SG.... some old things are lovely
Warm still with the life of forgotten men who made them ........................D.H. Lawrence
-
31st July 2010, 07:35 PM #10Banned
- Join Date
- Jun 2007
- Location
- Otautahi , Te Wa'hi Pounamu ( The Mainland) , NZ
- Age
- 69
- Posts
- 2,114
-
31st July 2010, 07:39 PM #11Jim
- Join Date
- Feb 2008
- Location
- Victoria
- Posts
- 3,191
-
31st July 2010, 07:44 PM #12Jim
- Join Date
- Feb 2008
- Location
- Victoria
- Posts
- 3,191
Ok. After you Jock
-
31st July 2010, 07:48 PM #13Banned
- Join Date
- Jun 2007
- Location
- Otautahi , Te Wa'hi Pounamu ( The Mainland) , NZ
- Age
- 69
- Posts
- 2,114
Half the answer each , ok Lilli ?
-
31st July 2010, 07:52 PM #14Jim
- Join Date
- Feb 2008
- Location
- Victoria
- Posts
- 3,191
put. gulli dean
-
31st July 2010, 08:00 PM #15Banned
- Join Date
- Jun 2007
- Location
- Otautahi , Te Wa'hi Pounamu ( The Mainland) , NZ
- Age
- 69
- Posts
- 2,114
Jim , do we carry on or do we wait to see if there actually is a prize ?
Similar Threads
-
Hamlet Bevel Edge Wood Chisels
By GarethR in forum WOODWORK - GENERALReplies: 9Last Post: 21st October 2008, 02:38 PM -
Bevel edge chisel review
By rsser in forum HAND TOOLS - UNPOWEREDReplies: 2Last Post: 5th June 2007, 06:59 PM