Page 5 of 5 FirstFirst 12345
Results 61 to 68 of 68
  1. #61
    Join Date
    Apr 2006
    Location
    Hobart
    Posts
    5,125

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by FenceFurniture View Post
    Good point Doug. I presume you would have to apply for a GST refund, but that would mean proving you had been refunded the original purchase price. Reasonably easy to do with PayPal I suppose (the proof).

    That's a bit more straightforward. They should be able to mark it as "nil value, replacement goods" or similar. And you would be able to prove that you had only paid once. However, it would still be a lot of buggerising around for all concerned.
    I think you are wrong on both counts, FF. Under existing practices to get a refund of GST and customs then you must re-export the faulty goods - usually not cost effective. The processes for claiming refund on goods remaining in Aus are so cumbersome and expensive it is only cost effective when there are a lot of $'s involved.

    I suspect that even if bueller isn't quite right (about canning it again before it starts) then it will get canned within a year or two, when they realise that it is a net money losing exercise for the Govt/Aust Post with all of their resources tied up in sorting out miserable little packages.
    But this is about politics, not economics or logic. In two reports the Productivity Commission has said that it will cost more to administer the threshhold reductions, than will be collected in tax. Some would say this is a dumb policy! In the business community it is routinely referred to as the "Harvey Norman Tax". Most small businessmen that I have talked to oppose it because of the administrative uncertainty that it will create.


    Cheers

    Graeme

  2. # ADS
    Google Adsense Advertisement
    Join Date
    Always
    Location
    Advertising world
    Posts
    Many





     
  3. #62
    Join Date
    Apr 2006
    Location
    Hobart
    Posts
    5,125

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by ian View Post
    I have a feeling that the changes will come in and we'll all be screwed.
    ......
    So
    1) hopefully, Lie Nielsen and Lee Valley and other specialist retailers aren't captured by the $75,000 threshold for annual sales to Australia and

    2) get ready to bombard your local politician should eBay and/or Amazon and/or Google Play store / Apple iTunes store stop Australian's using their services.
    How true, Ian, plus chaos.

    Should not affect LN and LV as both already sell through Australian distributors, not direct.

    Ebay is interesting; they do not actually sell anything into Australia, thousands of their vendors do though, and the vast majority would sell less than $75,000 into Oz. It is probably illegal for Ebay to reveal their client's confidential information.

    Amazon may simply decline to cooperate with Australian tax authorities. Whole realm of extrajurisdictional enforcement opens! Does Customs prohibit or tax books from Amazon, but allow those from Book Depository?

    Electronic downloaders, Apple, Google, etc, are even more interesting. And there are both GST and Corporate Income Tax issues. Do they comply, and perhaps they never have in the past, will some sort of withholding tax be created for their benefit, will NBNCo or RSP's be required to block their downloads, or what????

    I suspect they are making it up as the go. Stand by for chaos!



    Cheers

    Graeme

  4. #63
    Join Date
    Mar 2015
    Location
    Melbourne, Vic, Australia
    Posts
    1,255

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by GraemeCook View Post
    How true, Ian, plus chaos.

    Should not affect LN and LV as both already sell through Australian distributors, not direct.

    Cheers

    Graeme
    There is virtually no chance, IMO, that Lee Valley and Lie Nielsen aren't selling more than $75000 of their products directly to Australian customers (not through their Au distributors) and thus will also be affected.

    It will be interesting to see if it all goes ahead and if it works out. As with all similar laws it will be the reputable people that comply and suffer most.

  5. #64
    Join Date
    Feb 2003
    Location
    back in Alberta for a while
    Age
    68
    Posts
    12,006

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by GraemeCook View Post
    How true, Ian, plus chaos.

    Should not affect LN and LV as both already sell through Australian distributors, not direct.
    LV and LN both sell direct to Australian customers as well as through their Australian distributors. The question is:
    do either of them have more than $75,000 per year in direct sales to Australian end users.

    Quote Originally Posted by GraemeCook View Post
    Ebay is interesting; they do not actually sell anything into Australia, thousands of their vendors do though, and the vast majority would sell less than $75,000 into Oz. It is probably illegal for Ebay to reveal their client's confidential information.

    Amazon may simply decline to cooperate with Australian tax authorities. Whole realm of extrajurisdictional enforcement opens! Does Customs prohibit or tax books from Amazon, but allow those from Book Depository?
    in terms of the changes, both eBay and Amazon (and I guess AliExpress) are defined as ‘electronic distribution platforms’ (EDPs). Reading between the lines, this is where the ATO expects to collect the most revenue.
    BUT according to the Productivity Commission, eBay has strongly hinted that they are not going to play -- they have little if any interest in becoming a tax collector for the Australian Government (or any other government for that matter) so making an example of Australian consumers could be in their best long term business interest.


    If we think we are being screwed over, spare a thought for cyclists the Productivity Commission found that
    the magnitude of [the expected benefit for domestic retailers] is expected to be limited, since low value imports represent a small share of most retail subsectors (some segments such as bicycle parts and accessories are larger).
    regards from Alberta, Canada

    ian

  6. #65
    Join Date
    Mar 2006
    Location
    West Chermside
    Posts
    119

    Default

    Ozhunter,
    I have too many planes, including some well tuned Stanley planes with thick blades and a few Chinese made Luban planes and a Woodriver low angle Block plane, they are all fine tools that perform well. But the true premium planes like Veritas and Lie Nielsen are on a different level of performance straight out of the box with just a sharpen and hone. Many will say that you can tune a Stanley to perform as well as a premium plane and yes it can be done but it is a lot of work and is a steep learning curve. I have ruined more than one plane or spent time on a plane that should have been scrap metal a long before I got to it.

    My favourite planes are Block planes but with bench planes I like the LN4 in bronze,LN 5 1/2 and the LN 6. I also have a LN 4 1/2 and a LN 5 that I don't use as the other three do everything I want. A mate has a LN 62 that he reckons is the only plane you will ever need besides a block plane. He has that 62 plane and some extra blades ground in different ways.

    Then there is the "I like it and I want it" as well as the pride of ownership thing. My advise is if you think you want a LN 4 in bronze, go for it. It will mark a special birthday and will be with you long after you forget the price.. All the best.

  7. #66
    Join Date
    Mar 2006
    Location
    West Chermside
    Posts
    119

    Default

    Hi Graheme ,

    My son recently bought a couple of thousand dollars worth of text books from overseas and received a demand for import duty from Fed ex couriers who delivered the books within 48 hours of the payment being made to them. I imagine they then paid the necessary duty to who ever receives those monies in the Australian Govt. Perhaps it could work through those already existing systems. I'm just guessing that the Govt will not want to reinvent the wheel but modify existing systems.

    Best regards
    Jeff

  8. #67
    Join Date
    Apr 2006
    Location
    Hobart
    Posts
    5,125

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by labrat View Post
    Hi Graheme ,

    My son recently bought a couple of thousand dollars worth of text books from overseas and received a demand for import duty from Fed ex couriers who delivered the books within 48 hours of the payment being made to them. I imagine they then paid the necessary duty to who ever receives those monies in the Australian Govt. Perhaps it could work through those already existing systems. I'm just guessing that the Govt will not want to reinvent the wheel but modify existing systems.

    Best regards
    Jeff
    Hi Jeff

    But FedEx is the shipping Company, not the vendor. Amazon is not being asked to collect the duty.

    The point I was trying to make is that AusPost is not geared to collect millions (literally) of additional customs and GST charges and the system may just clog up.

    Alternatively, how can the government expect "unwilling" overseas vendors to cooperate. Many channels such as eBay, Aliexpress, Alibaba, Trademe and oftentimes Amazon (when it sells for third parties) are advertising or auction agents and not the actual vendor.

    But the government action is not being driven by hardnose economics or fiscal rationalism - the Productivity Commission has assessed that it will cost more to administer the increased tax than will be raised. It is being driven by political pressure and political donations, please do not read bribes, from a small number of large retail chains. Chaos will be a win for thr proponents.


    Cheers

    Graeme

  9. #68
    Join Date
    Feb 2003
    Location
    back in Alberta for a while
    Age
    68
    Posts
    12,006

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by labrat View Post
    My son recently bought a couple of thousand dollars worth of text books from overseas and received a demand for import duty from Fed ex couriers who delivered the books within 48 hours of the payment being made to them. I imagine they then paid the necessary duty to who ever receives those monies in the Australian Govt. Perhaps it could work through those already existing systems. I'm just guessing that the Govt will not want to reinvent the wheel but modify existing systems.
    This is the system in Canada.

    The only problem (and it's only a small problem) is that the courier companies (UPS, FedEx, DHL, etc) make their own assessment on what the import duty and GST are and then add a brokerage fee -- which for a small shipment might be more than the goods are worth.
    Living here for some of the year I have examples where the courier company's assessment of the duties and taxes owing are 4 to 5 times what Border Services Canada assess as the amount due. And then at least one of the companies calculates their handling charge as a percentage of the shipment's value.



    I understand that the Aus legislation requires the overseas retailer to collect and remit the 10% GST
    regards from Alberta, Canada

    ian

Page 5 of 5 FirstFirst 12345

Similar Threads

  1. N.S.W. Lie Nielsen No. 4 Bronze Smoothing Plane
    By Rockyhollis in forum WOODWORK - Tools & Machinery
    Replies: 7
    Last Post: 25th July 2020, 11:14 AM
  2. VICTORIA Lie Nielsen no. 4 smoothing plane
    By Harmek in forum WOODWORK - Tools & Machinery
    Replies: 2
    Last Post: 14th August 2017, 12:59 AM
  3. Calling all Transmig 165 users
    By john beaton in forum WELDING
    Replies: 0
    Last Post: 14th January 2009, 08:17 PM

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •