Thanks Thanks:  0
Likes Likes:  0
Needs Pictures Needs Pictures:  0
Picture(s) thanks Picture(s) thanks:  0
Results 1 to 4 of 4
  1. #1
    Join Date
    Feb 2006
    Location
    Lindfield N.S.W.
    Age
    62
    Posts
    5,643

    Default Jack = Fore, according to Moxon

    I have just received my copy of the electronic version of Moxon, Mechanick Exercises, produced by Gary Roberts of Toolemera.com. I was virtually flipping the pages when, in the dictionary of Carpenters' terms in the volume on House-carpentry I found the following:
    "Jack-plane, called so by Carpenters, but is indeed the same that Joyners call the Fore-plane".
    So, as far as Moxon was concerned, the Fore-plane (ie the plane used first to dress timber) used by joiners in making furniture was the same plane as the Jack plane used by carpenters in making houses. That makes sense to me - carpentry (in the sense of the woodwork to make a house structure as opposed to the finish work of skirtings, doors, windows, etc) is rougher and really only needs the same degree of dressing as is just the first stage of dressing for joinery work.



    I am not claiming that this is the end of the story (or indeed the beginning), but I might suggest that if this is the case (ie same plane under a different name in each trade) this is could be an example of how Stanley took some liberties with the terms that were used in the various trades to which it wanted to sell planes in order to:
    1. show that there was the plane that each trade had always used available frim Stanley in new you-beaut cast iron; and
    2. encourage plane users to think that they might need to buy more planes to cover other situations...
    Last edited by jmk89; 6th July 2009 at 05:22 PM. Reason: typos
    Cheers

    Jeremy
    If it were done when 'tis done, then 'twere well it were done quickly

  2. # ADS
    Google Adsense Advertisement
    Join Date
    Always
    Location
    Advertising world
    Age
    2010
    Posts
    Many





     
  3. #2
    Join Date
    Jan 2005
    Location
    Melbourne
    Age
    65
    Posts
    11,997

    Default

    Interesting find Jeremy. Nomenclature has always varied and caused confusion, I guess it always will.

  4. #3
    Join Date
    Feb 2003
    Location
    back in Alberta for a while
    Age
    68
    Posts
    12,006

    Default

    when I've had time to read it, you can have a look at my copy of Chris Schwarz's commentary on Moxon.
    From what I've read so far, the differences between different plane's functions relate more to the camber on the blade than to the planes name
    regards from Alberta, Canada

    ian

  5. #4
    Join Date
    Feb 2006
    Location
    Lindfield N.S.W.
    Age
    62
    Posts
    5,643

    Default

    Thanks, ian

    I also have a copy of Schwartz's Moxon - it is just the part about "Joinery". The interesting thing is that he (Moxon) does not mention the Jack plane in that section. Only in the Carpentry section. I don't recall Chris commenting on the definition of Jack plane in his commentary. But maybe I just missed it.
    Cheers

    Jeremy
    If it were done when 'tis done, then 'twere well it were done quickly

Similar Threads

  1. Replies: 14
    Last Post: 5th August 2005, 01:36 PM

Tags for this Thread

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •