Page 3 of 9 FirstFirst 12345678 ... LastLast
Results 31 to 45 of 121

Thread: Luban planes

  1. #31
    Join Date
    Mar 2010
    Location
    US
    Posts
    3,124

    Default

    Derek, there's a spectrum of possibilities here. What I wrote shouldn't be interpreted as "LN helped WC send planes to china to have them copied end to end and possibly made there".

    What I think is more possible is the two were in initial talks about WC making volume demands (which retailers often do - they don't just want volume, but they want volume and priority over others and WC had trouble stocking the planes in some of the stores and was demanding guaranteed stock from LN. This kind of "guarantee or else" isn't very maine in the US).

    The copied items that were sold at JWW were a different issue for LV.

    Too, I don't take the word of a store working as having the same credibility, but it wasn't the store worker who mentioned that WC wanted to have some priority or guarantee of quantity (the latter is what was mentioned to me, but the former comes along with that if you don't have quantity for everyone).

    I would bet discussions of how to meet quantity didn't get very far and things went sideways from there - I wasn't given the account of those details, just that LN had stipulations on how they wanted their planes to be displayed and demonstrated (as in, out in the open to get hands on and use) and WC had demands on quantity because most stores generally had little desirable in person (there were no bench planes at WC when I got the block plane - just two saws and the little block plane and maybe some trinkets). WC

    There's lots of ways this could go - and I know none of them for certain (again, carve out the blatant copying of LV's designs - that's different as you could make the case that LN didn't really do much to change bedrocks and they're stanley's designs. If anything, I think a perfectly made bedrock would be a nicer plane - with the hollow knurled wheel, etc - we know from LN's statements why we won't see rosewood handles, though (everyone who makes them develops a sensitivity and it's not sustainable to make them).

    There was probably legal threats/letters or possibly more which means you and I will never get a complete accounting from both sides, but I envision something like this *could have* happened:
    LN: you need to make our planes accessible and demonstrate them the way we say you should
    LN to JWW: stop selling our planes to gray market sellers (and whoever else did that - one small retailer here got LN planes through Japan woodworker and could still sell them below list. They were also able to get harima stuff, which was probably also just wholesaled by JWW)
    WC to LN: We want guaranteed stock fulfillment to keep a full array of planes in the stores - they sell too fast and we're left with empty shelf space and the franchisees are unhappy - they're losing profit opportunity
    LN: We can't guarantee supply and don't want to overextend ourselves (perhaps a comment about the casting operation in maine - which LN contracted and may still contract would be involved here).
    WC: we may be able to help find casting operations and toolmakers that could provide rough parts and help you get more through maine
    LN: maybe we could consider something like that
    (WC sends plane to china, factory basically copies it but takes some liberties and it's not quite as good)
    "See here, we had this plane made - they could make whole planes or any parts to help increase quantity or maybe we could have a licensed line of the same planes made overseas"
    LN: Blows stack over copied plane that looks like theirs
    WC: Or we could just do it on our own if you won't work with us
    LN: Or we could send you legal letters, and we've been thinking about bringing most of the sales back to our website, anyway

    Nobody told me any of that. The WC worker on SMC who was merely employed by a franchise as a part timer claimed that LN sent the plane to china themselves. I SERIOUSLY doubt that.

    I see things like the above happen fairly regularly with clients - one side wants to do something, the other drags their feet. As soon as the foot dragging side says "maybe there are things we could consider, we'll defer talking about it", the foot on the gas side comes back with "you said you were OK with this".

    I don't like it. I've never bought any WR anything because of it - the brand stinks to me because they could literally have dead copied a stanley bedrock, and one with a heavier casting (it's not like they can't be found). Why not? Were they afraid of stanley? I don't have a clue - but if the relationship doesn't work with LN, making something that's the colors of an LN tool with frog bits copied from LN doesn't make me feel warm - there is a stanley type that nobody is making and can't possibly be patented that you could just send and have copied from top top bottom, proportions at all, and if it pleases the beginners, the iron can be made to .11" instead of .08, and made harder, and the dumpy slab cap can be added, too, if it's too difficult to make a proper sprung cap and explain how to set it.

    Again, the only things I saw relayed were WC: we need more of them, and LN: we don't like gray market selling and at WC stores, the planes need to be demonstrated in a certain way (and that way did not mix with behind a glass case) and "we're looking at what's comfortable for expansion".

    That ultimately led to LN determining, yes, they could grow, yes they would still retail through people only they chose to retail through (craftsmanstudio, etc), and they had the market presence to direct buyers to demonstrations and their website.

    The only thing I saw of the whole LV copy debacle was that strikingly similar things showed up on JWW's page and Rob publicly said that they were not there with his permission and he wasn't satisfied with the pace and response about getting them taken off timely (as he said that, the items were still stocked).

    Every single item involved went back to qs-tool. Who knows who sent them all of the bits, or if they bought them on their own or what. I will never know - you will know more about LV's side. I talked to the president of WC at the time and won't mention anything he said to me as it's not really germane and doesn't add much to the above, anyway (nothing was conflicting with any of it).

    I came away from all of it with LN feeling like they had better options, maybe their concerns about demonstration hadn't been met, and that one thing you don't want to do as a healthy (but not cash pouring out of every seam) business is take on a huge risk and loan and probably not have an agreement that matches the duration of it. But that part again is just my interpretation - lots of businesses in the US will do whatever they can in the near term and assume they'll solve the long term later. Maine is more old school.

    LN did one thing that I didn't care too much for - they dictated that planes could only be sold for list, even from retailers continuing to sell them, and that stung me as a buyer as I'm an experimenter. If they are off list with no sales tax, I can play with one for a year or two and be out little. When tax and list are added to the equation, then, that effectively eliminates the ability to do that with so little exposure, but as they have their trade dress and its their brand, I respect their ability to do that. I would much rather be involved in their style of business than the franchise arrangement that WC has - if you have franchises (the president never said a thing to me about franchises - this is my comment) - now you have two customers to please, and if you run a website business, too, that's potentially in conflict with them. Too complicated, too many stakeholders given the drop ship world we live in now with some things, and what do you do when you want to clearance something? I wanted to try the koch system when WC said they were going to clear them out. There is no support and little documentation for them, so I contacted their corporate and said "I'm playing with buffers for sharpening, and I would like to know if you would unload these at a discount given there will be no support, no supplies and no documentation. AT 10% off of list, I'm hoping for a little better". Their customer service folks said "I show at least 7 of these at brick and mortar locations, so we can't really offer a bigger discount". Reading between the lines, they were agreeing with me but letting me know that if locations had something like that already in inventory, they couldn't undercut them, unlist them and leave the stores trying to figure out how to sell them. Any other business would've cut the price of them drastically just to get them out of their hair.

    I found the WC President to be friendly and honest, in general. At SMC, as soon as KO recognized him, his ID was ghosted, so he had no ability to post anything at all (obviously, LV is a sponsor there - LN stays off of forums as a matter of policy, and the only way that WC's side would've been told publicly on that forum at least (which is where the discussion was going on) would've been to pay a large sum to be an advertiser.

  2. # ADS
    Google Adsense Advertisement
    Join Date
    Always
    Location
    Advertising world
    Posts
    Many





     
  3. #32
    Join Date
    Mar 2010
    Location
    US
    Posts
    3,124

    Default

    i forgot about the separate scuffle with IBC and LV, the former ultimately selling some blades through WC, though I have no clue if they still do.

  4. #33
    Join Date
    Jan 2006
    Location
    United States Of America
    Posts
    194

    Default

    I own two newer Woodriver bench planes and they both easily out perform my fully restored and tuned antique Stanley bench planes. Without easy parts availability any brand will become Trash In The Cash. Here in the United States its easiest to get plane irons and parts for Woodriver, Lie Nielsen and Veritas. Getting used or like new parts for some older obsolete Record and Stanley plane designs can be challenging and just too expensive.

  5. #34
    Join Date
    May 2019
    Location
    Canberra, Australia
    Posts
    306

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by woodhog View Post
    I own two newer Woodriver bench planes and they both easily out perform my fully restored and tuned antique Stanley bench planes. Without easy parts availability any brand will become Trash In The Cash. Here in the United States its easiest to get plane irons and parts for Woodriver, Lie Nielsen and Veritas. Getting used or like new parts for some older obsolete Record and Stanley plane designs can be challenging and just too expensive.
    Obsolete plane designs notwithstanding, irons are compatible between Bailey and Bedrock designs which WR, LN and LV are based on (with the exception of a few uncommon ones like 2-1/4" irons). What other parts do you need to source to restore a hand plane?

  6. #35
    Join Date
    Apr 2001
    Location
    Perth
    Posts
    10,824

    Default

    Further to copying trade dress, a very recent comparison by Rob Cosman of LN and Bench Dog router planes ...



    Which would you choose, and why?

    Regards from Perth

    Derek
    Visit www.inthewoodshop.com for tutorials on constructing handtools, handtool reviews, and my trials and tribulations with furniture builds.

  7. #36
    Join Date
    Oct 2009
    Location
    South Africa
    Posts
    950

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by derekcohen View Post
    Which would you choose, and why?
    I’d probably buy an old Stanley, but if the choice was between the two, it would depend on my finances. If I could comfortably afford the extra, I’d go Lie Nielsen. If I was strapped for cash I’d consider the copycat.

  8. #37
    Join Date
    Mar 2010
    Location
    US
    Posts
    3,124

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by derekcohen View Post
    Further to copying trade dress, a very recent comparison by Rob Cosman of LN and Bench Dog router planes ...



    Which would you choose, and why?

    Regards from Perth

    Derek
    That was posted by youtube to me (i don't have cosman's channel on my YT subscriptions, but with the algorithms these days, YT doesn't seem to care what you're subscribed to and not).

    I posted a somewhat rotten comment already on that video - not to rob, but about the low class involved in someone sending the LN version off to be copied rather than just copying the stanley design (the stanley's casting would be harder to do, but aesthetics on casting is becoming a bit of a lost art).

    I referred to it as such, though - a low class move. Because that's what it is.

    The same reason I'd never buy a woodriver plane (just my preference, not one I want to dictate to anyone else) but would've thought it perfectly fair grounds if they'd have retailed a copy of a bedrock originally instead of a copy of an LN plane. I don't know who sells "bench dog" over here. I think it may be retailed at rockler (which for 15 years was 2 miles from me and I struggled to find anything of value there in the last decade- the store since relocated, probably to an area with lower rent).

  9. #38
    Join Date
    Mar 2010
    Location
    US
    Posts
    3,124

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Colin62 View Post
    I’d probably buy an old Stanley, but if the choice was between the two, it would depend on my finances. If I could comfortably afford the extra, I’d go Lie Nielsen. If I was strapped for cash I’d consider the copycat.
    Surprisingly, they're about the same price in the states now. I've had the LV version and have two stanleys. I like the stanley better actually for its looseness in use (I just find it easier to use and more comfortable because of that).

    I would guess paul sellers' commentary about a router plane being a must have has really driven them up, but a router plane with a blade and handles. A decade ago, I paid about $60 on average for a trio of good stanley and millers falls router planes.

  10. #39
    Join Date
    Jan 2006
    Location
    United States Of America
    Posts
    194

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by derekcohen View Post
    Further to copying trade dress, a very recent comparison by Rob Cosman of LN and Bench Dog router planes ...



    Which would you choose, and why?

    Regards from Perth

    Derek
    I purchased the Veritas Router Plane the cutter selection is good and they are easy to sharpen.

  11. #40
    Join Date
    Apr 2001
    Location
    Perth
    Posts
    10,824

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by woodhog View Post
    I purchased the Veritas Router Plane the cutter selection is good and they are easy to sharpen.
    That's side-stepping the question I have the Veritas as well, but the issue is whether one respects the original designer and accepts their higher cost, or go for for the copy because it costs less?

    Regards from Perth

    Derek
    Visit www.inthewoodshop.com for tutorials on constructing handtools, handtool reviews, and my trials and tribulations with furniture builds.

  12. #41
    Join Date
    Feb 2016
    Location
    Canberra
    Posts
    5,125

    Default Authentic design alliance

    You know, this is a pretty crazy thread.

    I follow the Authentic Design Alliance on Instagram and their message is simple: Stop copying other peoples designs commercially.

    There probably isn't a woodworker here who hasn't/doesn't replicate/s a thing for their own enjoyment, but its entirely another thing when you steal a design for the sole purpose of profit.

    Everyone should be repelled at such behaviour - copyright, patent or design registration aside. The behaviour is immoral and repulsive, for whatever reason it was copied.


    We, as woodworkers, see the Matt Blatts of the world steal other designers work and mercilessly rip off every element of it. Its bloody wrong.

    The tools we use should be held to the same standard.

    Read here for more: HOME Authentic Design Alliance

    This drives right to the heart of our work as aspiring craftspeople.

  13. #42
    Join Date
    Jun 2005
    Location
    Helensburgh
    Posts
    7,696

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by woodPixel View Post
    You know, this is a pretty crazy thread.

    I follow the Authentic Design Alliance on Instagram and their message is simple: Stop copying other peoples designs commercially.
    Taken to the Nth degree if that was to occur we would only have one cordless drill made by the original company who invented it. Everything gets copied if it is a commercial success, watch what happens when the patents come off the Domino, the same as happened when the Fein patents were retired on the Multitool.
    CHRIS

  14. #43
    Join Date
    May 2016
    Location
    Perth
    Posts
    409

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Chris Parks View Post
    Taken to the Nth degree if that was to occur we would only have one cordless drill made by the original company who invented it. Everything gets copied if it is a commercial success, watch what happens when the patents come off the Domino, the same as happened when the Fein patents were retired on the Multitool.
    I agree. The whole point of the patent system is to reward inventors with a period of exclusive rights before the rest of society gets the benefit of copying their work and hopefully improving on it further. It's hard to imagine much innovation happening without being able to copy the stuff other people have made.

    Maybe what we are approaching is the difference between legally using another's designs (good, at least for society) and trying to pass off your work as theirs (bad - copying trade dress etc).



    Sent from my SM-A115F using Tapatalk

  15. #44
    Join Date
    Feb 2016
    Location
    Canberra
    Posts
    5,125

    Default

    I included the link to the Alliance deliberately.

    There are a multitude of examples of where other peoples designs were stolen and the names played off to profit the thief.

    My example was the design of this plane. Its a direct ripoff. I'm not talking about patents, but design.

    Designers should be rewarded, no different to other industrial processes.


    Read the site and see why its so important.

  16. #45
    Join Date
    Apr 2001
    Location
    Perth
    Posts
    10,824

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Fergiz01 View Post
    I agree. The whole point of the patent system is to reward inventors with a period of exclusive rights before the rest of society gets the benefit of copying their work and hopefully improving on it further. It's hard to imagine much innovation happening without being able to copy the stuff other people have made.

    Maybe what we are approaching is the difference between legally using another's designs (good, at least for society) and trying to pass off your work as theirs (bad - copying trade dress etc).



    Sent from my SM-A115F using Tapatalk
    We stand on the shoulders of giants.

    This means that we use the information (design or technology) of what came before to create an advancement. The does not mean that one can use the exact design of another just because the patent has run out. While there is no legal redress here, it is theft no less. It most certainly is not about advancement.

    Regards from Perth

    Derek
    Visit www.inthewoodshop.com for tutorials on constructing handtools, handtool reviews, and my trials and tribulations with furniture builds.

Page 3 of 9 FirstFirst 12345678 ... LastLast

Similar Threads

  1. Christmas planes - Picture heavy- Luban and HNT
    By hurcorh in forum HAND TOOLS - UNPOWERED
    Replies: 14
    Last Post: 23rd August 2021, 12:13 PM
  2. Luban Chisels any one used them?
    By code4pay in forum HAND TOOLS - UNPOWERED
    Replies: 11
    Last Post: 23rd August 2021, 10:27 AM
  3. Is my Luban a Fake?
    By Redbean in forum HAND TOOLS - UNPOWERED
    Replies: 2
    Last Post: 7th January 2021, 10:01 PM
  4. Luban Chisels
    By DSEL74 in forum WOODWORK - GENERAL
    Replies: 7
    Last Post: 18th November 2013, 07:27 PM

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •