Thanks: 0
Needs Pictures: 0
Picture(s) thanks: 0
Results 16 to 26 of 26
Thread: Market saws
-
11th November 2018, 01:36 PM #16
Evolution
I was shoveling some gravel this morning and it all got too much so I took some time off and looked into the evolution (I am not going down the degenerative path) of the ubiquitous D8/D-8.
It's origins can be found in the No.80 introduced in 1874, but it quickly morphed into the D8 around 1880 (Source: Disstonian Institute) The examples below date from the 1896 to 1917 period where the medallion featured the word "PHILADA." The top saw screw is smaller than the other three on a 26" saw
P1040590 (Medium).JPGP1040591 (Medium).JPGP1040592 (Medium).JPGP1040599 (Medium).JPG
These saws date fro 1917 - 1940 by the medallion and feature "PHILA", but are in the later half of that era because they are D-8s, which came into being after the rationalisation of 1928. Thesaw screws are all the same size.
P1040594 (Medium).JPGP1040595 (Medium).JPG
This saw has nickel-plated, steel saw screws but full size. scews with the 1" medallion. It also says "USA" on the medallion as do the succeeding pix.
P1040596 (Medium).JPG
These two saws at first glance are the same and from the era 1947 - 1953. They both have nickle-plated saws screws, but have the smaller size screw and the smaller 13/16" medallion. The saw on the left has a medallion with the perimeter rounded on both sides while the other saw has more of a "D" shape to the perimeter which would make it earlier.
P1040597 (Medium).JPGP1040598 (Medium).JPG
The last saw is from the 1953 - 1955 period
P1040601 (Medium).JPG
Also I have to say that the "blockyness" of these saws is not so pronounced as I had first thought. In fact it seems that they always tended towards that. It is only the fourth pic above that shows a saw with the type of "curviness" we cherish (in saws that is), although it is a little damaged as you can see. One other giveaway to the later saws is that at some point after WW2 the applewood handles gave way to an unknown hardwood and were either coloured to look like apple or retained the colour of the particular wood used.
One other thing I would add about the D-8 is that it is an "honest" saw with little in the way of pretention. It was made in lightweight (narrow) versions as well as the regular (full width) models. It always seems to be a good saw.
Regards
PaulBushmiller;
"Power tends to corrupt. Absolute power corrupts, absolutely!"
-
11th November 2018 01:36 PM # ADSGoogle Adsense Advertisement
- Join Date
- Always
- Location
- Advertising world
- Age
- 2010
- Posts
- Many
-
11th November 2018, 07:42 PM #17
Paul - it's a pretty decent collection of saws when you can go to your container & nonchalantly pull out a series of a brand that is not even your main 'collection' brand to illustrate handle 'evolution' over a 60 year period!
Though since we are into words & meanings, I had to think about your use of 'evolution' rater than 'degeneration' for a process that made a species (handles) less fit for survival. However, on reflection, evolution can go that way, of course, which is how species become extinct, so it's ok.
Vale Disston......
Cheers,IW
-
11th November 2018, 08:55 PM #18
Ian
They were on one of the racks destined for restoration and resale. There was another rack, but I didn't go through that one!
Regards
PaulBushmiller;
"Power tends to corrupt. Absolute power corrupts, absolutely!"
-
11th November 2018, 09:24 PM #19
Sounds like a form of degenerate racking too me.
-
11th November 2018, 09:50 PM #20
Thanks for the pictures, Paul. I've been using one of those 'blocky-handled' saws around the backyard for the sort of work you wouldn't want to insult nice saws with, and found it to be surprisingly useable.
The later saws again, maybe 70s and 80s ?, that have a very light 'pine-y' handle are not nice to use, in my opinion - although I guess quite a few of the same-era Sandviks fall into that category too.
Cheers,
Paul
-
11th November 2018, 10:52 PM #21
-
11th November 2018, 11:05 PM #22
Sandviks are a strange breed. Good steel, but not tapered, and ugly block handles, despite dragon carving or equally unappealing plastic handles. There is one exception that had a steel plate on the handle. I think it may have been the 280: Possibly it only became passable because the steel plate covered most of the cheek.
Regards
PaulBushmiller;
"Power tends to corrupt. Absolute power corrupts, absolutely!"
-
12th November 2018, 08:23 AM #23
-
12th November 2018, 06:53 PM #24
Well, I just sharpened both saws and they cut well so will be users.
I am learning, slowley.
-
12th November 2018, 07:56 PM #25
-
12th November 2018, 08:35 PM #26
ok tomorrow.
I am learning, slowley.
Similar Threads
-
GMC saws vs. Jepson saws
By craig.robinson in forum HAND TOOLS - POWEREDReplies: 7Last Post: 10th February 2020, 10:22 PM -
Frames Saws/Bows Saws for re-sawing small boards 100mm deep
By Kate84TS in forum HAND TOOLS - UNPOWEREDReplies: 29Last Post: 15th April 2017, 03:15 PM -
Market
By pawoods in forum SCROLLERS FORUMReplies: 1Last Post: 1st December 2015, 09:07 PM -
To market, to market... let the buyer beware.
By dakotax3 in forum HAND TOOLS - POWEREDReplies: 4Last Post: 13th November 2011, 01:38 PM -
Table Saws vs Radial Arm Saws
By RIMP in forum TABLE SAWS & COMBINATIONSReplies: 13Last Post: 14th March 2007, 05:22 PM