Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast
Results 1 to 15 of 27
  1. #1
    Join Date
    Mar 2004
    Location
    Brisbane (western suburbs)
    Age
    77
    Posts
    12,117

    Default More metal-bodied planes

    Dammit, the chitchat and buzz of excitement going on in "THE GREAT PLANE CHALLENGE" got me all twitchy, and feeling left out since I’m not allowed to enter, so I set a little “challenge” for meself. I made a couple of planes over the last week & a bit so I could at least have some fun even if I’m barred from the main event..

    First I made an “English thumb plane”, based loosely on the Norris A31: 1TP b.jpg

    Then I made a rear-bun smoother: 2 TP c.jpg





    ‘Course they look a bit less impressive when put in proper perspective. Here they are beside a #4 for scale:

    3 Planes cf2.jpg



    I actually did have “serious” reasons for doing both planes. The little curved-sided plane was made to test some stainless steel that Bushmiller gave me. The actual alloy is unknown, but possibly 304 or similar. The interweb tells me that 304 & 316 are far & away the most common alloys & used for a wide variety of purposes. Both are said to have ‘good workability’, they cannot be heat-hardened because the C content is too low, but will work-harden, which is a worry if I want to peen it extensively. Anyway, I cut off a sliver and my quick&dirty peening test indicated it would take a fair amount of bashing without becoming brittle. In fact, it seemed quite soft when I started hacksawing off a chunk, but like other SS I’ve used, it dulled the teeth pretty quickly. It was especially hard on the jewellers saw blades I used to cut out the dovetails, they only cut about half as far in this stuff as they will in mild steel of the same thickness. The set wears off the teeth and the blades start binding after cutting 25-30mm of the SS material. If I persist & force it, the blade seizes in the cut & ends up breaking as I’m trying to free it. I presume it’s the chromium content that causes the rapid wear on the teeth?

    At ~3.2mm thick, it is ok for the sole of a mini plane, and I had a scrap of 2.5mm H62 brass for sides, so I decided to whip up a little 80mm finger plane, and see how the unknown SS scrubbed up. As a further challenge, I gave it curved sides, something I’ve not done before on a plane this small.

    One thing I’ve learnt about curved sides is to go easy on the curves! It doesn’t take much to give them that streamlined look, and the tighter the curve, the harder it becomes to get it all together neatly.
    My sole curves in about 3mm at the front and 4-5mm at the back, but it’s enough to give it a definite roundness: 4 Body shape.jpg

    The soft Chinese brass bent very easily with about half the springback of the harder C380 I’m used to bending, but it did want to kink at the shallow part where the sides dip down around the throat, instead of yielding in a smooth curve. With some careful squeezing, I managed to iron them out a bit & get the sides to match the sole reasonably closely. Both Paul’s SS and the brass peened very nicely, so I got a pretty good, gap-free body after initial cleanup: 5 Body peened.jpg

    I had a small piece of some lovely dark Rosewood which has been kicking about for so long I’ve forgotten when/where I got it, but it would’ve been before the CITES ban which was many decades ago already. There was a hair-line crack at one end, but it didn’t appear to go far into the piece, so I cut my two buns out & proceeded to fit them. However that crack went deeper than I thought, and when I was paring the side of the front bun, a piece split away. I tried to glue it back on, but the clamp didn’t pull the irregular shape tight against. Fortunately, the bit I’d cut off was just long enough for a second attempt. This time I gently prised the crack open a bit with a chisel & drizzled in some superglue, then clamped it up tight. That disappeared the crack entirely, but I was very, very careful shaping it. Anyway, the second bun went in without a hitch and was an even better fit. Once glued & pinned in the plane, the crack is invisible & out of harm’s way. Both buns ended up as good a fit as I’ve ever managed, which surprised me – working at this scale with arthritic fingers starts to get difficult!

    Got a nice tight mouth: 6 Mouth.jpg

    And it made some nice shavings first try: 7 Shavings.jpg

    Gotta love Rosewood, it makes the most beautiful, tactile handles, easy to see why it has been cut almost to extinction..

    More to follow...
    IW

  2. # ADS
    Google Adsense Advertisement
    Join Date
    Always
    Location
    Advertising world
    Age
    2010
    Posts
    Many





     
  3. #2
    Join Date
    Mar 2004
    Location
    Brisbane (western suburbs)
    Age
    77
    Posts
    12,117

    Default English Thumb Plane

    This little plane had a very roundabout path from concept to completion. I wanted to try some cold-rolled steel I’d got for soles, and make a test-bed for the blade I’d made from some 1080 knife steel I’d bought after it was mentioned by Doug3030 elsewhere. Initially, it was to be a “Scottish” version of a so-called “thumb plane” with continuous bent sides, and a practice run for the box mitre plane I’ve been avoiding starting on for about a year. Then I thought I might want to add a screw adjuster, and a rounded, bent back would make that awkward, as well as the 1/8” material being a bit thin to take the stud for the thumbwheel. So it morphed into something very like a Norris A31.
    The blade is 32mm wide because that’s the width of the steel blank, which is a close match to the 1 ¼” of the Norris original. The main departure from the Norris configuration is the bed angle (15*) is probably a bit lower than the Norris. Nothing I can find mentions the bed angle, but Norris typically used about 18* on his low-angle planes.

    The originals have a long toe like a shoulder plane, about 1/3rd of the sole length which I wanted to retain, so I drew up a plan & elevation & made a full-scale model to check that everything would fit in its proper pace. 8 TP model.jpg

    I wanted to keep the profile low for comfortable one-hand use, but had to be sure I had enough room for an adequate wedge & a bridge for the thumbscrew. The model looked to be in-proportion & fitted my hand nicely. The wedge on the Norris is very long and looks a bit out of proportion to me, so I shortened it a lot on my mock-up, then decided it would look better & be more comfy if I made the bulge a bit longer than on the model. Again, the piece of Macassar Ebony I had for the wedge & front bun was just the right amount – I knew it would find the perfect use someday. However, with absolutely nothing to spare, I was rather nervous fitting it in case something went wrong!

    With those details sorted, it was time to cut up some brass & steel. I used the ‘hard’ 380 brass (3.2mm) for sides and the cold-rolled 5mm steel for the sole. Cold-rolled plate has less mill-scale than hot-rolled stuff & I thought that would make it easier to clean up. It was, but only marginally; it still has a goodly coating of oxide that is as hard as the hobs of hell & takes a lot of sanding to remove. I should buy myself a decent linisher but I’m not making any more planes!

    Apart from the sole, this was an easy build. The sole had to be split & re-joined because with a bed angle of 15 degrees, there is no other way to cut a fine mouth slot with hand tools. This is my 4th split sole, and I was determined to get an ultra-fine mouth (not because I think they are absolutely essential, but for the challenge) and an invisible join. Typically, the two pieces of sole are rejoined with a ‘tongue & groove’ joint or simply indexed with a Vee joint.

    I cut & filed a ‘notch’ out of the front (toe) piece, 1.5mm deep, to make two lugs at either edge, and then marked & cut the “tongues” on these. I sawed as close to the lines as I could with a junior hacksaw, then used a flat needle file and a thin scraper ground from an old saw file to square the corners. Flat needle files range from ~ 1.2 to 1.5mm thick, depending on brand, which is comfortably less than a third of the 5mm thick material I used for the sole. The other tool I find essential is a spent 3-corner file ground to a short flat about 1.5mm wide, which I use to square the bottoms of the grooves & the shoulders of the tongue: 9 Tonguing tools.jpg

    The corresponding grooves were marked out & cut on the heel piece after I formed the bed. The long, low bevel of the bed gives plenty of room to work on the grooves without fear of damaging it.

    Making this T&G joint isn’t half as difficult as you may think. You can close a loose fit up to some extent at least during peening, but you want it as accurate as possible so it keeps the sole pieces aligned. I have never got it absolutely perfect, but a tiny mismatch is easily dealt with when it comes time to flatten the sole. You want the joints to hold together firmly while scribing the tails, so if a join is a bit loose I very gently tap the top of the groove side to tighten it enough to hold. Apologies for the blurry pic, the camera decided to focus on the front edge, but here it is ready to scribe: 10 TP sole.jpg

    Still more....
    IW

  4. #3
    Join Date
    Mar 2004
    Location
    Brisbane (western suburbs)
    Age
    77
    Posts
    12,117

    Default English THumb plane, part II

    Making the blade bed is the most tedious (& critical) part of these planes. To speed things up, I first marked out where the back of the bevel falls, then made a series of cuts with a hacksaw. Note that I marked another line in front of the line marking the full extent of the bevel cut; this was my line to work to so I wouldn’t over-cut. Experience has taught me that with the saw at such an angle, it’s really hard to see when you are at the line. You can see I did over-cut this ‘safety line’ a couple of times, but fortunately, not as far as the ‘real’ line, which is what I want to file to: 11 TP filing bed 1.jpg

    Now I knock out he dags of spare metal, then clamp a guide to the sole & just file away for a day or two (actually it took less than an hour, but it feels like days!): 12TP filing bed 2.jpg

    The last stages take the most care, ensuring that bed is dead flat. I used layout dye applied thickly to the back of my blade & rubbed it over the bevel to test if they were mating. Another crude scraper made from a spent file helped to finesse it (& square the corners) until I was happy I had better than 80% contact between blade & bed. The corners at the sides have to be scraped square because files are never square at their corners and you cannot make dead square corners with a file alone.

    With the bed bevel made, the pins can be scribed & cut. Fitting sides to sole is no more difficult than fitting a single-piece sole: scribe, cut out, file & fit, but you do need to fit the tails to their sockets very carefully with split soles, so the two pieces can’t open up when you start peening.

    This one went without a hitch: 13 TP fitting sides.jpg

    Peening straight sides is also a lot easier than peening curved sides – half an hour or less of hammering had it looking good (or should I say pretty ugly at this stage!): 14 TP peening.jpg

    Then, much filing!
    And eventually, it begins to look like a plane body: 15 Side cleanup.jpg

    Still a ways to go, but I won’t finish filing the sides completely until I’ve fitted the bridge & rear cross-piece.
    I decided to fit the bridge permanently on this plane. On my chariot planes I used ‘floating’ screws to hold the bridge, but I decided to go for the ‘clean’ look & use brass pins. I threaded some 3mm brass rod & screwed these into holes tapped into the bridge, then peened them into recesses on the sides: 16 TP pinning bridge.jpg

    You can also use tapered pins (called “clockmakers pins”) hammered into undersized holes in the bridge, instead of threading the rod. I’ve used this method a couple of times and been very impressed by how firmly the pins hold – you cannot get them apart without a LOT of force once hammered in. Using threaded rods just allowed me a bit more leeway, I don’t have to commit to the final fitting until I’m happy everything is properly in pace.
    With the bridge fitted, I glued in a wedge of wood to fill the space between sole & back piece. This isn’t really necessary, the blade will sit perfectly well on the sole bevel & the back piece and is unlikely to bend under thumbscrew pressure. The makers of the original old box mitre planes didn’t bother & just left the space empty. However, I had a small scrap left from cutting the wedge, so I thought I may as well fill the void, it’ll stop garbage accumulating in there.

    The plane can now be assembled to lap the sole. No matter how carefully I fit & peen, two-piece soles always end up slightly out of alignment. The first half-dozen passes show the toe-piece is lower than the rear bit: 17 TP sole cleanup.jpg

    But it was only a thousandth of an inch or so, & soon started to straighten out: 18 Sole lapping 1.jpg

    It didn’t take too long to get a nice, flat sole (small soles are far, far less work than big ones!): 19 Sole lapping 2.jpg

    At last, the fun part has arrived, first shavings: 20 TP2.jpg

    I had a bit of bother with the mouth – I’d made it very tight, and the blade would barely come though enough to cut. The thinnest needle file I have wouldn’t fit through, but I needed to take a few more thou off the front of that mouth. However, where there’s a will there’s a way, I found I could just get the end of one of those plastic paddle diamond-file thingies in, & took a wee bit off the sharp edge of the blade bevel (that knife edge is a liability anyway, & needs blunting a bit). Then I could just get the thinnest file in and take off the fraction needed to leave a mouth opening of somewhere between 0.1 & 0.2 of a mm with the blade extruded enough to cut. That’s what I consider a practical gap for a plane like this that will get all sorts of general use rather than the ultra-tight, barely-visible-at-all mouth of a mitre plane.

    I’m not sure about my blade, yet. I haven’t tempered it after its oil quench. It’s not as hard as the blade I quenched in brine so I’m using it as-is for the moment. It sharpened up nicely & isn’t chipping, so I’ll see how it goes. I’ll feed it to some she-oak sometime, that will soon show me how tough it is!

    Cheers,
    IW

  5. #4
    Join Date
    May 2011
    Location
    Albury
    Posts
    3,034

    Default

    An absolute master class as usual Ian.

    The stainless steel you've used is most likely to be 304, it's much more common than 316 due to it being extensively used in the food industries. As you have noted these 300 series stainless steels can be work hardened. One of the more interesting side effects of work hardening is that the metal becomes magnetic. This is dramatically demonstrated in the old pressed stainless steel hubcaps where the flat areas remain non-magnetic but the 'bent' areas where the metal has been put under more stress becomes noticeably magnetic.

  6. #5
    Join Date
    Apr 2006
    Location
    near Mackay
    Age
    59
    Posts
    4,634

    Default

    Wow Ian, 3 new planes in less time that it’s taken us to contemplate making ours for the challenge.
    Thanks for the inspiration, I just caught this thread while having my mid morning coffee.
    Just finished a few jobs on the bathroom Reno, and about to head down to the shed to do a bit more on my challenge plane, I will go over your posts here again after my days proceedings, I am sure to have missed some detail.
    ​Brad.

  7. #6
    Join Date
    Oct 2010
    Location
    NSW
    Posts
    652

    Default

    Bloody show off.


    going now.

  8. #7
    Join Date
    Mar 2004
    Location
    Brisbane (western suburbs)
    Age
    77
    Posts
    12,117

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Ironwood View Post
    Wow Ian, 3 new planes in less time that it’s taken us to contemplate making ours for the challenge......
    Just two, Brad, unless you count the mock-up...

    Yeah, I am showing off a bit, but my intention is to encourage a few more lurkers who might be thinking of giving the challenge a go, but are still feeling it might be beyond them. I didn't keep track of how long those planes took me, but it would've been less than 20 hours each, spread over almost 2 weeks. I'm probably four times quicker now than when I first made a dovetailed plane, but even at that rate, there's still lots of time before the closing date.

    Cheers,
    IW

  9. #8
    Join Date
    Oct 2010
    Location
    NSW
    Posts
    652

    Default

    I think I would need to do eight hour days for the two weeks and still wouldn't end up with the result you have.

  10. #9
    Join Date
    Nov 2011
    Location
    Melbourne
    Posts
    7,008

    Default

    Ye Second the show of thingy,[emoji6]

    Nice effort again Ian, were would be with your inspiration a.


    Cheers Matt.

  11. #10
    Join Date
    Oct 2012
    Location
    Melbourne
    Posts
    91

    Default

    Thanks for the masterclass

  12. #11
    Join Date
    May 2019
    Location
    Brisbane
    Posts
    836

    Default

    You moan that you could not enter the challenge and yet you show us all how it's done and how far we still have to go...

    Great little planes. Actually I do find them even more impressive when next to the bigger Stanley. Then they look so neat.

    Sent from my SM-G950F using Tapatalk

  13. #12
    Join Date
    Nov 2004
    Location
    Millmerran,QLD
    Age
    73
    Posts
    11,129

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by IanW View Post
    Just two, Brad, unless you count the mock-up...

    Yeah, I am showing off a bit, but my intention is to encourage a few more lurkers who might be thinking of giving the challenge a go, but are still feeling it might be beyond them. I didn't keep track of how long those planes took me, but it would've been less than 20 hours each, spread over almost 2 weeks. I'm probably four times quicker now than when I first made a dovetailed plane, but even at that rate, there's still lots of time before the closing date.

    Cheers,
    Ok. So my master plan is to go straight to the tenth plane I make thereby circumventing all the potential mistakes and vastly increasing my skill level without spending wasteful time on the intermediate planes.

    Easy!



    Regards
    Paul
    Bushmiller;

    "Power tends to corrupt. Absolute power corrupts, absolutely!"

  14. #13
    Join Date
    Oct 2018
    Location
    Dandenong Ranges
    Posts
    1,892

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Bushmiller View Post
    Ok. So my master plan is to go straight to the tenth plane I make thereby circumventing all the potential mistakes and vastly increasing my skill level without spending wasteful time on the intermediate planes.

    Easy!



    Regards
    Paul
    Seems the most sensible idea and definitely more cost effective

  15. #14
    Join Date
    Nov 2011
    Location
    Melbourne
    Posts
    7,008

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Bushmiller View Post
    Ok. So my master plan is to go straight to the tenth plane I make thereby circumventing all the potential mistakes and vastly increasing my skill level without spending wasteful time on the intermediate planes.

    Easy!



    Regards
    Paul
    Will you be documenting that climb ,so we can enjoy the journey with you.?

    Cheers Matt.

  16. #15
    Join Date
    Nov 2004
    Location
    Millmerran,QLD
    Age
    73
    Posts
    11,129

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Simplicity View Post
    Will you be documenting that climb ,so we can enjoy the journey with you.?

    Cheers Matt.
    Absolutely, but you will be required to provide your own safety harness.



    Regards
    Paul
    Bushmiller;

    "Power tends to corrupt. Absolute power corrupts, absolutely!"

Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast

Similar Threads

  1. Wooden Bodied Handplanes
    By Beaver in forum HAND TOOLS - UNPOWERED
    Replies: 5
    Last Post: 9th May 2017, 09:10 AM
  2. Wood bodied planes a good intro
    By DSEL74 in forum HAND TOOLS - UNPOWERED
    Replies: 11
    Last Post: 22nd November 2013, 09:41 PM
  3. A small solid-bodied woody
    By IanW in forum HAND TOOLS - UNPOWERED
    Replies: 9
    Last Post: 21st October 2011, 02:32 PM
  4. Galoot: How-to website for metal plough & combination planes
    By paul.cleary in forum HAND TOOLS - UNPOWERED
    Replies: 1
    Last Post: 24th June 2007, 10:52 AM
  5. wood bodied Match plane (?)
    By Clinton1 in forum HAND TOOLS - UNPOWERED
    Replies: 3
    Last Post: 28th March 2006, 06:02 PM

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •