Results 1 to 12 of 12
  1. #1
    Join Date
    May 2009
    Location
    Sydney
    Posts
    11

    Default Is this a genuine Stanley plane?

    Hi,

    I just bought a couple of Stanley planes, a 12-004 and a 12-005.
    The No4 looks just like my old Stanley plane except that the handles are plastic instead of wood.
    The No5, on the other hand, is of much lower quality. Every part is inferior to the No4. The face of the frog is not ground, the lever cap is warped, the blade is not stamped with the Stanley name and is not close to square (1.5mm gap at one end), the cap iron is rounded where it presses against the blade instead of having a flat surface. The cap iron is about 2/3 the thickness as the No4. etc, etc.

    I suspect that this may be a fake Stanley. I have attached some pictures comparing the new No4 and the new No5. Can someone have a look and tell me if this is really a new Stanley 12-005?

    Thanks,

    Al

    IMG_7704.jpg
    IMG_7707.jpg
    IMG_7708.jpg
    IMG_7712.jpg
    IMG_7713.jpg

  2. # ADS
    Google Adsense Advertisement
    Join Date
    Always
    Location
    Advertising world
    Posts
    Many





     
  3. #2
    Join Date
    Sep 2010
    Location
    Sydney
    Posts
    1,983

    Default

    They are new stanley built to poor manufacturer levels of quality.
    Can you take them back? If yes then I suggest you do. Hit the forum for some research and then buy something decent .
    Buy cheap buy twice

  4. #3
    Join Date
    Sep 2008
    Location
    Petone, NZ
    Age
    68
    Posts
    2,822

    Default

    That No.5 does look particularly crappy . I'd be looking to get my money back (for the No.5 at least).

    If you don't want to spend too much on a plane you're better off buying an older one (the older, the better quality). If money's not a problem then look at a Lie-Nielsen www.lie-nielsen.com ; a Veritas www.leevalley.com ; or a Clifton (google).

    Cheers, Vann.
    Gatherer of rusty planes tools...
    Proud member of the Wadkin Blockhead Club .

  5. #4
    Join Date
    Mar 2008
    Location
    Lambton, Newcastle, NSW, Australia
    Posts
    4,957

    Default

    Were they the handyman range? either way they should go back. Even the Wood River planes would be better or any Chinese plane by the look of that 5. Where did you buy them from? Go to the markets and buy oldies but goodies or as above Lee Valley Veritas or Lie Nielsen. I started with some oldies from the market, built up a good set, tuned them up and then sold them of for LV's and LN's.
    Instagram: mark_aylward
    www.solidwoodfurniture.com.au


    A good edge takes a little sweat!!

  6. #5
    Join Date
    May 2009
    Location
    Sydney
    Posts
    11

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Claw Hama View Post
    Were they the handyman range?
    I bought both on ebay. They are not the Handyman range.
    I am happy with the No4. After some tuning it is working perfectly well.
    As far as I can see, it is identical to the Stanley I bought second hand 20 years ago.

    I am almost certain that the No5 is a fake. Nothing about it looks right. The box is missing the bar code.
    Even the printing of the box is lower quality than the genuine box. I will try to return it.

    Of course I know that Lie Nielsen and Veritas planes are better than Stanleys.
    I bought Stanleys for the same reason I drive a 10 year old Falcon instead of a new BMW.
    It isn't that I think old Falcons are better than BMW's.

  7. #6
    Join Date
    Oct 2009
    Location
    South Africa
    Posts
    950

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by BigGayAl View Post
    Of course I know that Lie Nielsen and Veritas planes are better than Stanleys.
    I bought Stanleys for the same reason I drive a 10 year old Falcon instead of a new BMW.
    It isn't that I think old Falcons are better than BMW's.
    Very well put.

    Any reason you didn't buy an older Stanley? Is it rude to ask what you paid for them?

  8. #7
    Join Date
    Sep 2008
    Location
    Petone, NZ
    Age
    68
    Posts
    2,822

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by BigGayAl View Post
    I bought both on ebay...
    I am almost certain that the No5 is a fake. Nothing about it looks right. The box is missing the bar code.
    Even the printing of the box is lower quality than the genuine box. I will try to return it.
    I don't know the in-and-outs of Australian commerce law - but I suspect that No.5 is beyond doing up (that is, I doubt you could get it to take a shaving). As such, it's not fit for purpose - that should be grounds for cancelling the sale. But you may have to put a lot of pressure on the seller. Was the seller in Australia?

    It's also possible that Stanley may be interested (not that their reputation for quality tools extends to their planes anymore) - but someone ripping off their products AND their name, may upset them.

    Cheers, Vann.
    Gatherer of rusty planes tools...
    Proud member of the Wadkin Blockhead Club .

  9. #8
    Join Date
    May 2009
    Location
    Sydney
    Posts
    11

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Colin62 View Post
    Any reason you didn't buy an older Stanley?
    I am not confident I can judge the quality and condition of an old plane.

    Quote Originally Posted by Colin62 View Post
    Is it rude to ask what you paid for them?
    $63 for the No4 and $75 for the No5, including postage.

    Al

  10. #9
    Join Date
    May 2009
    Location
    Sydney
    Posts
    11

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Vann View Post
    I don't know the in-and-outs of Australian commerce law - but I suspect that No.5 is beyond doing up (that is, I doubt you could get it to take a shaving). As such, it's not fit for purpose - that should be grounds for cancelling the sale. But you may have to put a lot of pressure on the seller. Was the seller in Australia?
    It was an Australian seller. The consumer protection laws are clear enough but enforcing them can be impractical. I am trying to get my money back through PayPal.

    Quote Originally Posted by Vann View Post
    It's also possible that Stanley may be interested.
    You would think so, wouldn't you? I sent them an email through their web site and got no reply. I will try calling them.

    Al

  11. #10
    Join Date
    Oct 2009
    Location
    South Africa
    Posts
    950

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by BigGayAl View Post
    I am not confident I can judge the quality and condition of an old plane.
    There is a huge amount of knowledge here (and I don't include myself in that), and on top of that, lots of goodwill. If you have a plane you're considering buying, then popping a link up here will soon have a few replies from people who really know their stuff offering solid advice. Of course the down side is that that may push the price up a little

  12. #11
    Join Date
    Mar 2008
    Location
    Lambton, Newcastle, NSW, Australia
    Posts
    4,957

    Default

    Your eye seems fine, I think you should trust yourself to look at a second hand one. There are plenty out there to choose from
    so just look around and wait for a good one to turn up. Watch for cracks in the cast body is probably the main thing, most of the other bits can be replaced or repaired. I often picked up oldies that were broken or worn for $5 - $10 for spare parts. I only have a couple of stanlys left but one is a hybrid from parts of three planes with a new chunky blade from one of the group buys from the forum. It's an absolute gem of a plane. $63 & $75 you were about half way to a 5 1/4 Veritas which would do both the 4 & 5 work. Veritas® #5-1/4W Bench Plane - Lee Valley Tools
    I drive an "old" Jeep but I save up for good planes
    Instagram: mark_aylward
    www.solidwoodfurniture.com.au


    A good edge takes a little sweat!!

  13. #12
    Join Date
    Apr 2006
    Location
    Hobart
    Posts
    5,125

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by BigGayAl View Post
    I am almost certain that the No5 is a fake. Nothing about it looks right. The box is missing the bar code.
    Even the printing of the box is lower quality than the genuine box. I will try to return it.

    Good Morning Al

    Somehow, I just find it hard to believe this assertion.

    I can understand someone replicating a Lie Nielsen, or a Lee Valley, or a Clifton, or a HNT Gordon plane. Wow, if only I had the skills to fake a Terry Gordon plane convincingly...........

    But why would anyone try to fake a modern Stanley? Stanley do an excellent job at white anting their own reputation, or what's left of it.




    Fair Winds

    Graeme

Similar Threads

  1. Home Made Round Chamfer Plane Using A Stanley Smoothing Plane
    By mike48 in forum HAND TOOLS - UNPOWERED
    Replies: 3
    Last Post: 8th January 2013, 10:17 AM
  2. Genuine Bailey Plane
    By matt1245 in forum HAND TOOLS - UNPOWERED
    Replies: 2
    Last Post: 6th June 2005, 12:14 PM

Tags for this Thread

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •