Page 2 of 2 FirstFirst 12
Results 16 to 29 of 29
  1. #16
    Join Date
    Oct 2007
    Location
    Naples - Italy
    Age
    57
    Posts
    127

    Default

    Ciao Matt,
    nice plane and a demonstration that wooden low angle planes can exist!

    Quote Originally Posted by Berlin View Post
    12 degree bevel + 30 degree honing angle.
    Why a so low blade bevel?

    Giuliano

  2. # ADS
    Google Adsense Advertisement
    Join Date
    Always
    Location
    Advertising world
    Age
    2010
    Posts
    Many





     
  3. #17
    Join Date
    Mar 2004
    Location
    Brisbane (western suburbs)
    Age
    78
    Posts
    12,186

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by ac445ab View Post
    .......Why a so low blade bevel?.....
    Why not?

    I have the strong impression that Matt made this plane in large part to test prevailing wisdom, which is as good a reason as just about any other I can think of. Time will tell how successful it is, but it has the best chance, being made of pretty tough wood, and very well put together, so let's wait for a progress report in a few years' time....

    Since the original discussion where Matt brought up the subject of low-angled woodies, I've been pondering this whole business of plane types & blade geometry for the umpteenth time, and it seems to defy a logical analysis. F'rinstance, the 'hotrod' has a cutting angle that is very close to your standard Bailey type plane (12 + 32 = 42* vs 45*). It has 12* of clearance, vs 15* for the Bailey with a typical grind/hone angle of 25/30, so as far as the wood is concerned, the edges attacking it are nearly identical. What drove the first person to make a "low-angled" version of a plane in any case??

    Yet low-angled planes do have a different feel in the way they work. Is it because the applied force is aligned more closely to the long axis of the cutter? Is it a betteer bedding arrrangement? Or is it mostly imagination?! These are just rhetorical questions, the subject has been kicked around a lot, here & in other forums, and so far I haven't read any totally satisfying or pursuasive arguments as to why it is so.......

    Anyways, much kudos to Matt for putting his ideas to the test. Mucking about, having fun, getting a new tool out of it, and learning something all at the same time - priceless!
    Cheers,
    IW

  4. #18
    Join Date
    Nov 2007
    Location
    Dundowran Beach
    Age
    76
    Posts
    19,922

    Thumbs up

    Nice one Matt!! Not only does it look good it obviously works well AND is tough!!!

  5. #19
    Join Date
    Oct 2007
    Location
    Naples - Italy
    Age
    57
    Posts
    127

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by IanW View Post
    Why not?

    I have the strong impression that Matt made this plane in large part to test prevailing wisdom, which is as good a reason as just about any other I can think of. Time will tell how successful it is, but it has the best chance, being made of pretty tough wood, and very well put together, so let's wait for a progress report in a few years' time....

    Since the original discussion where Matt brought up the subject of low-angled woodies, I've been pondering this whole business of plane types & blade geometry for the umpteenth time, and it seems to defy a logical analysis. F'rinstance, the 'hotrod' has a cutting angle that is very close to your standard Bailey type plane (12 + 32 = 42* vs 45*). It has 12* of clearance, vs 15* for the Bailey with a typical grind/hone angle of 25/30, so as far as the wood is concerned, the edges attacking it are nearly identical. What drove the first person to make a "low-angled" version of a plane in any case??

    Yet low-angled planes do have a different feel in the way they work. Is it because the applied force is aligned more closely to the long axis of the cutter? Is it a betteer bedding arrrangement? Or is it mostly imagination?! These are just rhetorical questions, the subject has been kicked around a lot, here & in other forums, and so far I haven't read any totally satisfying or pursuasive arguments as to why it is so.......

    Anyways, much kudos to Matt for putting his ideas to the test. Mucking about, having fun, getting a new tool out of it, and learning something all at the same time - priceless!
    Cheers,
    All clear, Ian! It was a misunderstanding! I tought 12° was the grinding blade bevel not the seat (Matt in the first post indicated a 15° angle for the seat) but more likely the guilt is of my bad English! Sorry

  6. #20
    Join Date
    Mar 2004
    Location
    Brisbane (western suburbs)
    Age
    78
    Posts
    12,186

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by ac445ab View Post
    .......but more likely the guilt is of my bad English! Sorry
    No need to apologise, Guiliano - your English is far, far better than my Italiian! You and quite a few other non-English speakers do amazingly well on our Forum. Australians are notorious for their use of slang & obtuse terms - I'm not sure what's being said myself, at times....!

    Cheers,
    IW

  7. #21
    Join Date
    Oct 2007
    Location
    Naples - Italy
    Age
    57
    Posts
    127

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by IanW View Post
    - I'm not sure what's being said myself, at times....!

    Cheers,



  8. #22
    Join Date
    Jan 2009
    Location
    Brisbane
    Posts
    800

    Default Noddy's Hotrod - low angle wedged wooden block plane

    Quote Originally Posted by ac445ab View Post
    Ciao Matt,
    nice plane and a demonstration that wooden low angle planes can exist!



    Why a so low blade bevel?

    Giuliano
    Nothing's wrong with your English Giuliano, i made a mistake. I meant 12 degree BED not bevel, sorry for the confusion. To be honest, it might be 12, it might be 15 or anywhere in between. The part for the bed skated around in the epoxy glue when I clamped it up and i wriggled it until it was about right but never actually measured the final angle.

    Ian, there is one really good reason for the low angle on a block plane - it's much easier to make a plane you can comfortably grip one handed. On 35 degree block planes the blade sticks up exactly where I want to put my hand. To address that there is normally some sort of knob but that just makes the whole apparatus that much chunkier... As for the BU bench planes, I have no idea.

    Thanks all for the comments

    Matt
    ...I'll just make the other bits smaller.

  9. #23
    Join Date
    Mar 2004
    Location
    Brisbane (western suburbs)
    Age
    78
    Posts
    12,186

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Berlin View Post
    .....Ian, there is one really good reason for the low angle on a block plane - it's much easier to make a plane you can comfortably grip one handed.....
    Not sure if that was what drove the original design, Matt, but it is as good as any other reason I've heard. and better than most.......

    Cheers,
    IW

  10. #24
    Join Date
    Mar 2004
    Location
    Brisbane (western suburbs)
    Age
    78
    Posts
    12,186

    Default You are not alone!

    Matt, just saw this in the Lee Valley newsletter, & immediately thought of you.....
    IW

  11. #25
    Join Date
    Dec 2007
    Location
    Melbourne
    Posts
    3,277

    Default

    Matt,

    That is a sexy looking little plane! I like the design detail you have added to what could really just have been a block.
    …..Live a Quiet Life & Work with your Hands

  12. #26
    Join Date
    Jan 2009
    Location
    Brisbane
    Posts
    800

    Default

    Sorry chaps, only just noticed the comments. I've been kept busy recently by a preparing to build a house and haven't kept up to date with the forum.

    Thanks for the props Dsel I had fun making the little guy and it has trucked on just fine... accepting that the mouth was too wide from the start and really needs closing up.

    Ian, I don't know if I'd have the patience to laminate anything as thoroughly as that Preston remake, although I see where you're leading; you think I should re build my battle weary Preston. But its so pretty with all its welds an chips and missing details. What's not to love?

    Ok, I'll see what I can do, it may be a wee while though. There are a few chores on the list!

    Matt
    ...I'll just make the other bits smaller.

  13. #27
    Join Date
    Mar 2004
    Location
    Brisbane (western suburbs)
    Age
    78
    Posts
    12,186

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Berlin View Post
    ......it may be a wee while though. There are a few chores on the list!
    Hmm, the list that never shortens, once you own a house!

    Wondered where you'd been the last little while. Fitting out a new workshop & making stuff for a new house will fill your appointments book for a while, I reckon. Next thing we know there'll be a little Berlin on the way, and your toolmaking career will be on hold for years to come.....

    Cheers,
    IW

  14. #28
    Join Date
    Aug 2009
    Location
    Armadale Perth WA
    Age
    55
    Posts
    4,524

    Default

    Can always make toys ... but its another sub-forum


  15. #29
    Join Date
    Jan 2009
    Location
    Brisbane
    Posts
    800

    Default

    Nah, I can just take the blade out and put Noddy in and she's good to go as a little car. Function stacking, it's the way of the future.
    ...I'll just make the other bits smaller.

Page 2 of 2 FirstFirst 12

Similar Threads

  1. Standard or Low Angle Block Plane?
    By Morbius in forum HAND TOOLS - UNPOWERED
    Replies: 2
    Last Post: 30th September 2010, 10:15 AM
  2. Cutter angle for a 12-060 low angle block plane
    By scoobs6170 in forum HAND TOOLS - UNPOWERED
    Replies: 3
    Last Post: 22nd February 2009, 09:46 AM
  3. Low angle block plane
    By old_picker in forum HAND TOOLS - UNPOWERED
    Replies: 31
    Last Post: 22nd March 2007, 10:37 AM

Tags for this Thread

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •