Thanks: 0
Likes: 0
Needs Pictures: 0
Picture(s) thanks: 0
Results 31 to 45 of 61
Thread: Planing straight and true
-
16th June 2010, 01:33 PM #31Hewer of wood
- Join Date
- Jan 2002
- Location
- Melbourne, Aus.
- Age
- 71
- Posts
- 12,746
In my book if the blade is tuned the pushing takes less effort and there's more energy for control.
There's a couple of articles on the FWW website by Chris Gochnour which newbies might find useful (needs membership or 14 day trial membership). Here's one: click I went looking for this kind of advice recently when I made a hash of a simple planing job. The tips about stance and weighting helped.
Anyway, didn't Michael show that you can't get flat with a handplane over jointing distances? (using a properly flat #7) Click.Cheers, Ern
-
16th June 2010 01:33 PM # ADSGoogle Adsense Advertisement
- Join Date
- Always
- Location
- Advertising world
- Age
- 2010
- Posts
- Many
-
16th June 2010, 02:33 PM #32Jim
- Join Date
- Feb 2008
- Location
- Victoria
- Posts
- 3,191
-
16th June 2010, 02:53 PM #33
Cruzi - not sure I agree with your first 3 tenets (I've only been at it for a while, & maybe I'm a just a tool retard )
But I definitely disagree with you on your last statement, The error SIDE to SIDE cancels out, PROVIDED the blade is sharpend dead straight, & your error remains in the one plane for the length of the board. But if you think about any LONGITUDINAL errors, (i.e. slight hills or slight dips) they are doubled. It's not an idiot-proof method, unfortunately, or I would be one of the first to embrace it. Things can get ugly when you try it for joining several boards at once, so I think I'll go on presevering with one-at-a-time jointing except for quick & dirty jobs.
Ern - a plane can't cut a straight line in theory, but in practice, you can make it do something very close. That's why hand work is challenging & fun.
Cheers,IW
-
16th June 2010, 03:20 PM #34
My primary issue with it, as Ian and I both commented, is the troubling aspect of adhesive-lubricated boards sliding over one another at glue up. It's like herding cats when that happens.
(And to be fair to that Michael chap, he did say that a flat jointer tends towards a flat planed edge with only a small error, and if you start with a machine-straightened edge, you can use whatever length flat plane you like and the edge will stay flat... )
Cheers
Michael
-
16th June 2010, 04:15 PM #35Hewer of wood
- Join Date
- Jan 2002
- Location
- Melbourne, Aus.
- Age
- 71
- Posts
- 12,746
Apologies again to that Michael chap for any misrepresentation
I lament my lack of a tech education.
I had made the assumption that Tiger wasn't cleaning up after a jointer.
....
Well we haven't heard much from him since the OP.
I offer him the use of my power jointer for the cost of blade sharpening, and if he's interested we could have a play at hand jointing with my new V. BU.Cheers, Ern
-
16th June 2010, 04:49 PM #36
-
16th June 2010, 05:28 PM #37SENIOR MEMBER
- Join Date
- Nov 2006
- Location
- t
- Posts
- 961
Guys, you really should get a couple of boards, mark the faces, face them in or out, get a No 6 for short to medium stuff or a 7 for medium to long stuff and deliberately plane a twist, so long as you have a full length cut (conceded), you will get a perfect join.
Want to join a few boards, do each join in turn.
It really isn't rocket science.
Have been doing it that way for a while now and for a couple of years it was the only way of jointing I had.
I had struggled with fences and shooting boards became impractical with longer boards, but once you get the boards right, it was easy and bloody quick.
Now if you try and joint with a No 4 you are never going to get it right, can be done on small stuff with a No 5 but if you can make dips with a No 6 or 7, well.........
-
16th June 2010, 05:53 PM #38Hewer of wood
- Join Date
- Jan 2002
- Location
- Melbourne, Aus.
- Age
- 71
- Posts
- 12,746
Yes, expect I can make dips with whatever, and practice and testing is the only way to go; quite right Cruzi.
Michael, I'll send the V. up happily. If you send it back flat ;-} With the new feeler gauges (if they can be trusted) under the V. straight edge ( if it can be trusted) the front of the mouth is about 1 thou concave. I say 'about' since the feelers only go down to 1.5
Yes, time to bone up on the geometry so I can pass the examCheers, Ern
-
16th June 2010, 06:58 PM #39Senior Member
- Join Date
- Oct 2006
- Location
- Brisbane
- Posts
- 133
...snip...
Also I would add that this method works as long as the edges are not planed to be convex. I've found small 'dips' not to be so much a problem as these are similar to a sprung joint, but too much pressure on either end of the stroke leads to a join where there are gaps at the end (as it does on other methods of jointing).
Just saying the method is not completely foolproof, but also agreeing it does cover for some types of error.
-
16th June 2010, 11:39 PM #40
Thanks guys for your input on this as I'm sure I'm not the only one who has wondered how to plane true.
Just to answer any queries. Ern, the boards I do tend to vary from 20 mm to 40 mm thick. I do have a jointer but I am after that seemingly perfect joint that hand planing gives you, sometimes I get it right, other times I don't even get close.
-
17th June 2010, 12:19 PM #41Hewer of wood
- Join Date
- Jan 2002
- Location
- Melbourne, Aus.
- Age
- 71
- Posts
- 12,746
Well you have a diagnostic job to do Tiger. If it's the same plane producing diff results your technique is varying.
See up the vid cam on a tripod and do your own analysis or post on YouTube.
This is how we sometimes problem-solve in ski telemark turning. When you can observe yourself outside of the pressure of not falling over it can be revealing.Cheers, Ern
-
17th June 2010, 01:27 PM #42
Michael - changing the subject slightly, I know what you mean about flat surfaces sliding around during glue up. For me that's one of the BIG benefits of the domino machine; even if the edges have plenty of surface area for glue, I'll put a couple of dominoes in just to accurately register the two pieces. With this done (on the tight fitting domino setting) you can then concentrate on clamping to provide uniform pressure along the glue line without having to worry about the parts sliding around and out of alignment.
Just curious - has anyone tried the fence attachment for the Veritas BU Jointer (shown earlier in this thread)?? Does it work as intended, or is it one of the very small percentage of Veritas products that ALMOST work?
-
17th June 2010, 02:05 PM #43Hewer of wood
- Join Date
- Jan 2002
- Location
- Melbourne, Aus.
- Age
- 71
- Posts
- 12,746
K, can satisfy your curiosity perhaps Mr B. I got one with my new BU jointer and will give it a run this arvo.
Cheers, Ern
-
17th June 2010, 02:15 PM #44
Ern - love to hear how it goes......cheers
It LOOKS like it should work, but I've been caught out by that before (e.g. Veritas Mk I honing guide vs. the Mk II which I now have).
I was just checking prices before the Sydney WWW show (all the better to judge any 'discounts' on offer....), and note that Carbatec's price for the BU jointer isn't far off the Lee Valley price. There's only about $40 in it at a 0.85 A$/US$ exchange rate, and that's without any allowance for freight. Plus, it stands a better chance of getting to the shed in one piece if purchased locallyLast edited by Mr Brush; 17th June 2010 at 02:16 PM. Reason: typo
-
17th June 2010, 02:39 PM #45
Similar Threads
-
Is this what planing looks like?
By Afro Boy in forum HAND TOOLS - UNPOWEREDReplies: 17Last Post: 15th September 2012, 02:21 AM -
Planing
By Wood Chip in forum WOODWORK - GENERALReplies: 3Last Post: 16th February 2009, 07:10 PM -
How straight is your straight edge?
By echnidna in forum HAND TOOLS - UNPOWEREDReplies: 17Last Post: 5th November 2005, 10:12 AM -
3m straight edge - or how straight can one get angle iron
By burn in forum WOODWORK - GENERALReplies: 10Last Post: 16th February 2004, 07:06 AM -
Planing
By woggit in forum HAND TOOLS - UNPOWEREDReplies: 2Last Post: 27th December 2003, 08:25 PM