Needs Pictures: 0
Results 1 to 15 of 17
Thread: Sargent Plane
-
18th February 2023, 03:18 PM #1GOLD MEMBER
- Join Date
- Oct 2018
- Location
- Dandenong Ranges
- Posts
- 1,906
Sargent Plane
Hi all. Only recently have I discovered the LumberJocks forums and the wealth of new hand tool info in them. Whilst Stanley planes reign supreme here, Millers Falls and Sargent seem to be on equal footing in the US. Interested in alternatives (and the quality of the restorations) I purchased a Sargent VBM #409 to see what all the fuss was about (and to try lifting my resto game). I must say that there is a lot to like.
20230218_133241.jpg
The blade is thicker, the chip breaker a little better made and the handles are gorgeous. The Wood is East India Mahogany and I love the slightly longer horn. This will probably become my go to shape for all future handles.
20230218_133159.jpg
There are a couple of nasties though. The base has a small chip at the knob and a tiny bit of the tote is missing. The lateral adjust lever is very flimsy and for some reason the depth adjusting wheel grinds a little.
20230218_133214.jpg
I am learning more about making the shiny bits look nicer. Working through the grits, finishing with wet and dry and then Autosol polished really helps.
Oh, and it works.
-
18th February 2023 03:18 PM # ADSGoogle Adsense Advertisement
- Join Date
- Always
- Location
- Advertising world
- Posts
- Many
-
18th February 2023, 04:45 PM #2
MA
Nice job.
Sargent had a very wide range of hand planes in all three categories (wood, transitional and steel). I have a couple I am looking forward to working with, but looking at the projects it is a fairly long way off as it falls within the realms of an "indulgence."
Regards
PaulBushmiller;
"Power tends to corrupt. Absolute power corrupts, absolutely!"
-
18th February 2023, 06:37 PM #3GOLD MEMBER
- Join Date
- Oct 2018
- Location
- Dandenong Ranges
- Posts
- 1,906
Hi Paul. I haven't seen many wooden ones but the transitional are very nice. Not very common in Oz.
-
18th February 2023, 08:46 PM #4
MA
My project planes are Transitionals and they did indeed come from the US. These are Sargent wood planes from one of their 1910 catalogues. They seem to have phased them out in later editions and even a 1911 catalogue did not feature them.
Sargent wood planes 1910.jpg
Regards
PaulBushmiller;
"Power tends to corrupt. Absolute power corrupts, absolutely!"
-
18th February 2023, 11:59 PM #5GOLD MEMBER
- Join Date
- Oct 2018
- Location
- Dandenong Ranges
- Posts
- 1,906
Love those old catalogues. Do you have any idea of the difference between "warranted" and "not warranted"? And what was the "lignum vitae start"? I have a reprint of Sargent's 1911 "Tool Book" for "Mechanics". Great read, and it has my VBM plane in it.
-
19th February 2023, 01:11 AM #6Bushmiller;
"Power tends to corrupt. Absolute power corrupts, absolutely!"
-
19th February 2023, 03:17 AM #7Senior Member
- Join Date
- Nov 2010
- Location
- Sebastopol, California, USA
- Posts
- 180
The Sargent bench planes varied quite a bit from their top line planes to their entry level planes.
The specialty planes were often simplified versions. Their #79 duplex rabbet plane, for instance, was a simpler version of the (later) Stanley #78: same double bed, standard location and bullnose location; similar lever cap; but depth setting was by delicate fingers (also known as guess) rather than by a lever.
Still, good planes, and certainly better than the mass market new ones.
For those looking for a way to spend a few idle moments (or do actual research): The Sargent Planes Page - Handplanes Manufactured by Sargent Tools
-
19th February 2023, 01:06 PM #8GOLD MEMBER
- Join Date
- Oct 2018
- Location
- Dandenong Ranges
- Posts
- 1,906
Hi Bill. Mine is marked VBM- very best made!
-
20th February 2023, 01:09 AM #9GOLD MEMBER
- Join Date
- Mar 2010
- Location
- US
- Posts
- 3,150
Start = strike button on the front of the plane.
in theory, warranted planes/parts were returnable for complaint or defect, it was more of a tier-marking term, to market that whatever is warranted should be quality.
I don't know any exact percentage, but would guess that sargent's vbm planes were a small % of stanley's bailey planes in terms of market share. Most catalogs, as you've probably seen, list stanley's planes and then options that cost less (lakeside, union, probably some sargent. My M-W 1895 catalog only has chaplin's patent planes (more expensive than stanley, didn't fare well in the market), three sets of transitionals (all stanley, from liberty bell to ...I don't know what the difference is for the other two), and then some off brand (but quality) combination planes, etc that are expensive.
re: the all wood planes, ohio tools double iron planes can be had in a set of four (not listed as warranted, and of all of the irons I've seen, if an ohio tool or auburn iron is a dud, refreshing the heat treatment doesn't cure it - the steel itself is lacking in quality). the set of four only costs about the same as a single metal stanley jack plane. Barton's "warranted" wooden planes are sold in a set of four for just under twice the price of the ohio set.
VBM are about as good as stanley bailey, but different. I've had several of the VBM irons, and all have been a step softer than stanley (probably on purpose, maybe because they're thicker) and some of the VBMs at least have a biased ramp toward the plane's mouth. It's a novel idea, but not practical for making a difference vs. stanley's types with support that's straight up and down all the way to the mouth. They are not cheaply made, though (The VBMs) and I've had but one (A #3 that I must've sold 15 years ago because it was a 3 and in need of a part).
Some of the other sargent line have unsupported lengths of iron below the bottom of the frog, and they are not a match for stanley. same goes for union as well as any types of stanley that don't have support all the way down.
I don't know MFs story other than that they came along very late, but their first four types had cost cuts more in softer castings (which are kind of nice if you have to flatten them), and the irons aren't quite a match for stanley's Pre 1950s or so irons. And they are painted, and have a stamped yoke (also a yawner for me - if the yoke works, two piece stamped is fine. i've never seen one broken, either).
-
20th February 2023, 07:28 AM #10GOLD MEMBER
- Join Date
- Oct 2018
- Location
- Dandenong Ranges
- Posts
- 1,906
Thanks David. Great info. My next plane to restore is a Vaughan Bushnell #905. Have you any experience of these?
-
20th February 2023, 08:43 AM #11GOLD MEMBER
- Join Date
- Mar 2010
- Location
- US
- Posts
- 3,150
I think raffo may have showed up with one, or maybe not, but I've never planed with one. IIRC, they're all steel, or at least some of them are drop forged plane bodies. I wonder if they're lighter than a stanley.
I looked up pictures of them, and they look like they have a frog design that can support the iron all the way down - it's hard for a plane to be bad if that's the case and there's nothing uncomfortable about it.
-
20th February 2023, 09:58 AM #12Senior Member
- Join Date
- Apr 2020
- Location
- USA
- Posts
- 122
I do have one, a #3. It works as well for as a good stanley.
The body is drop forged steel, the machining is not smooth, but it's accurate. It should resist dropping it on concrete.
The 900 series was their top of the line, the lever cap was nickel plated and perhaps other bells and whistles. Mine is an 800 or 700 series.
---
I've a question regarding the Sargent wooden planes, the non warranted planes cost the same as the warranted ones. So, what distinguished them?
-
20th February 2023, 01:09 PM #13
-
20th February 2023, 06:26 PM #14GOLD MEMBER
- Join Date
- Oct 2018
- Location
- Dandenong Ranges
- Posts
- 1,906
Thanks David and Raffo. I have read up a little about them. I am looking forward to seeing how the walnut knob and tote come up. Mine has a Fulton blade, which funnily enough is "warranted". Not original which is a shame but looks thickish.
-
21st February 2023, 01:39 AM #15
I've owned a V&B 905. I thought it was a Bedrock in the grainy picture when I saw it on marketplace due to its flat top sides. I preferred my type 13 Bailey so I sold it on when I rationalised all my planes a few years ago. Much of the nickel had worn off, so my example had lost much of the lustre it must have had when it was new. Hope yours comes up nice and turns into a keeper. Cheers, Zac.
Similar Threads
-
SOLD: SARGENT Autoset 714 Hand Plane
By Scribbly Gum in forum WOODWORK - Tools & MachineryReplies: 3Last Post: 4th June 2021, 07:08 PM -
Sargent 722 Plane
By Geoff123 in forum HAND TOOLS - UNPOWEREDReplies: 8Last Post: 23rd May 2011, 02:28 PM -
No. 3 Sargent
By mañana in forum HAND TOOLS - UNPOWEREDReplies: 4Last Post: 20th June 2010, 09:01 PM -
Sargent No 5206 low-angle block plane Worth having?
By kiwioutdoors in forum HAND TOOLS - UNPOWEREDReplies: 2Last Post: 18th June 2007, 06:53 PM -
Sargent 4 1/2
By Groggy in forum HAND TOOLS - POWEREDReplies: 5Last Post: 22nd June 2006, 07:45 PM