Results 16 to 30 of 168
Thread: A few old saws
-
8th December 2015, 04:20 PM #16
-
8th December 2015 04:20 PM # ADSGoogle Adsense Advertisement
- Join Date
- Always
- Location
- Advertising world
- Posts
- Many
-
8th December 2015, 04:31 PM #17Deceased
- Join Date
- May 2008
- Location
- Australia
- Posts
- 2,357
That's it Dave. http://www.eqa.co.uk/
-
8th December 2015, 05:42 PM #18
Would seem my only hope for a brand is to find an etch under the rust
Thx for the link
Dave TTC
Turning Wood Into Art
-
8th December 2015, 08:32 PM #19
Dave
One of the most exciting aspect of hand saw restoration is finding an etch under the rust or black grime.
Very sorry to hear about the lack of Simonds, but not surprised.
Regards
PaulBushmiller;
"Power tends to corrupt. Absolute power corrupts, absolutely!"
-
8th December 2015, 08:34 PM #20
What do you suggest. Wet and dry?
And have you sharpened this profile before?
Dave TTC
Turning Wood Into Art
-
8th December 2015, 08:35 PM #21
-
8th December 2015, 08:52 PM #22
-
8th December 2015, 09:18 PM #23
broom, what's a broom?
regards
Nick
veni, vidi, tornavi
Without wood it's just ...
-
8th December 2015, 10:16 PM #24
Dave
Asking questions like that is opening a humungus can of worms? There have been whole threads devoted to that topic.
The short answer is yes to W & D. Begin with the finest paper that reasonably removes some of the rust and grime. I try to start with nothing coarser than 240g. Anything coarser than that and you have to start asking whether it will all be worthwhile. Use a small block of hardwood and work the length of the saw. It is much easier if the handle is removed which you are clearly going to do.
You can't do this sort of work dry. So whatever your favourite brew is. And you are going to need some lubricant for the W & D! There are many alternatives including white spirit (mineral turps), WD40, water etc..
Go carefully over the area where you suspect the etch might lie. Work up to finer grades as you go.
Good luck and welcome to the rocky road.
I haven't sharpened that profile, but it is reminiscent of Disston's D-17
Disston D17 010.jpgDisston D17 002.jpgDisston D17 008.jpg
As you can see, it starts with conventional crosscut teeth and then goes to a recurring pattern of rip teeth and crosscut teeth separated by a large gullet. It was supposed to be a saw adept at cutting both across the grain and with the grain.
I think your saw may have been for the same purpose. Atkins had several Universal saws that were similar in concept.
You can probably use a chainsaw file to sharpen or profile the gullets.
Regards
PaulBushmiller;
"Power tends to corrupt. Absolute power corrupts, absolutely!"
-
9th December 2015, 07:44 AM #25
Well I have a couple of days work in Melbourne and then a weeks work in Sydney but after that things could be quiet. ....
Dave TTC
Turning Wood Into Art
-
9th December 2015, 04:31 PM #26
-
12th December 2015, 04:58 AM #27
I think it might be for "garden work" ... green woodas was said.
From your group shot, the first ones I'd look at would be the first 3 and the 5th one with the largest blade.
None of the handles seem to indicate anything maybe pre-1900 as far as I can tell ... ?
Definitely fun and frustrating trying to glean info from under the rust ...
Cheers,
Paul
-
12th December 2015, 06:08 AM #28
image.jpgHere are a couple of bad boys I recently picked up on Ebay.
The top one is a Disston, not sure about the bottom one. It has no medallion and is missing most of the brass bolts.
Does anyone have any info on these?
Regards
Pete.
-
12th December 2015, 07:59 AM #29
Thanks Paul. I would live to an eye that tells me simply byblooking at tbe handle. I may get thwre in time.
Nice looking saws Pete. Are you gonna dona bushmiller job to them?
Dave TTC
Turning Wood Into Art
-
12th December 2015, 08:30 AM #30
Pete
Both your saws are crosscut models for cutting logs. You should be able to identify the age of the Disston saw by comparing the medallions on the Disstonian Institute website:
Online Reference of Disston Saws -- The Medallions
The lower saw has a peg tooth pattern and is not so sophisticated as the Disston.
The holes in the saw plate are for a vertical helper handle: For a second person in the case of the toe hole and just for the operators other hand in the case of the hole ahead of the handle.
They look as though they would both clean up very nicely, but being large saws there is a lot of work there.
Regards
PaulBushmiller;
"Power tends to corrupt. Absolute power corrupts, absolutely!"
Similar Threads
-
GMC saws vs. Jepson saws
By craig.robinson in forum HAND TOOLS - POWEREDReplies: 7Last Post: 10th February 2020, 10:22 PM -
Bad Axe Saws
By SimonArchibald in forum HAND TOOLS - UNPOWEREDReplies: 8Last Post: 23rd April 2012, 04:16 PM -
Rip saws
By wattycoo in forum HAND TOOLS - UNPOWEREDReplies: 2Last Post: 13th November 2010, 12:06 PM -
Ian's Saws.
By Scribbly Gum in forum HAND TOOLS - UNPOWEREDReplies: 23Last Post: 18th December 2009, 08:55 AM -
Table Saws vs Radial Arm Saws
By RIMP in forum TABLE SAWS & COMBINATIONSReplies: 13Last Post: 14th March 2007, 05:22 PM