Page 17 of 30 FirstFirst ... 7121314151617181920212227 ... LastLast
Results 241 to 255 of 444
  1. #241
    Join Date
    Aug 2011
    Location
    Stockton
    Posts
    291

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Bushmiller View Post
    Good pick up Stew. I wish I could buy Simonds saws for ten bucks! Trouble is there is not much opportunity for such purchases in my neck of the woods.

    So, having had my little moan and viciously sawn the end off a 4 x 2 to indicate the level of my displeasure to anyone who might be looking, I am pretty certain you have picked up a No.62. My reasoning is this: The medallion is from the Simonds Saw and Steel era being 1923 to 1926. During this period only the eight Blue Ribbon models, the No.10 (now a medium width saw) and the No.10 1/2 (still full width) were made. Therefore with the hardware configuration of your saw combined with wheat carving on the grip and the flat it can only be a No.62 or a No.262.

    Also if you clean up the plate further to the right there should be two more etches. One is the Simonds' steel symbol while the other is the "broadest guarantee" statement.

    From the pix your saw looks deep. The No.262 was about 6" deep when measured in a line from the back to the tooth line through the medallion while the No.62 was at least 7" deep. So if your saw is 6" or more wide it is definitely the No.62.

    The other saw you have there (have we seen that before) could be a No.72 or a No.8 1/2.

    Regards
    Paul
    Thanks Paul ! I will send a progress photo of the restoration. Ps the other saw is definitely a 72.

    Cheers
    Stewart

  2. # ADS
    Google Adsense Advertisement
    Join Date
    Always
    Location
    Advertising world
    Posts
    Many





     
  3. #242
    Join Date
    Nov 2004
    Location
    Millmerran,QLD
    Age
    73
    Posts
    11,138

    Default

    I'll look forward to seeing it Stew. Always happy to see a good Simonds.

    Regards
    Paul
    Bushmiller;

    "Power tends to corrupt. Absolute power corrupts, absolutely!"

  4. #243
    Join Date
    Nov 2004
    Location
    Millmerran,QLD
    Age
    73
    Posts
    11,138

    Default Simonds Hand Saw Timelines

    For some time now I have been planning to post a timeline for the various Simonds hand saw models. Recently Rob Streeper asked for some details and I gave some indication of the time frame via the medallions, but of course that does not tell the whole story. This is a list on when the various models were produced based on the catalogues I have:

    -Simonds Model timeline.png

    * The 1914 catalogue is a Pacific Coast edition and I think some models were omitted although available elsewhere. The No.7 1/2 and the possibly the No.8 1/2 (The last mention is 1912) are in this category and at least one "third level" saw is missing.

    ** None of these saws ever appeared in catalogues I have. They do exist as I either have them or have seen them.

    There is a discrepancy between the the Blue Ribbon saws for 1914 and 1916 in that the seventy series are there in 1914 but not in 1916. I can't explain that one. Also it is apparent that while there were eventually eight Blue Ribbon saws (plus the "Junior," which was also Blue Ribbon) initially only the full depth models were introduced. The narrow models appeared later: This could have been 1914 or 1916.

    Something I have not mentioned previously is that all the "third level" (my terminology) saws had a number as well as a name. I have not posted pix of these saws yet and is something I must do in the future.

    I will update this list as more information comes to hand.

    I have not included the back saws as they were all produced virtually continuously through the period 1900 to 1926. They were the No.95 (Mitre saw), No.96 (Back saw with Apple handle), No.97 (Back saw with Beech handle, No.98 (Bay State Back saw), No.99 ( Babbitt Back saw).

    Regards
    Paul
    Bushmiller;

    "Power tends to corrupt. Absolute power corrupts, absolutely!"

  5. #244
    Join Date
    Nov 2004
    Location
    Millmerran,QLD
    Age
    73
    Posts
    11,138

    Default

    A while back(posts #182 and #192) I mentioned Simonds No.166, which as far as I know is the smallest saw they made. I have now cleaned it up, jointed and shaped it (but not sharpened it).

    P1000662.jpgP1000663.jpgP1000664.jpgP1000665.jpgP1000666.jpg

    As Rob Streeper commented, the only way for an adult male to hold this is with two fingers through the grip, the first finger pointing down the plate and the little finger tucked under the handle. There is a little pitting on the steel, but the handle is almost perfect with just a small chip ahead of the front saw screw.

    Regards
    Paul
    Bushmiller;

    "Power tends to corrupt. Absolute power corrupts, absolutely!"

  6. #245
    Join Date
    Nov 2004
    Location
    Millmerran,QLD
    Age
    73
    Posts
    11,138

    Default

    I see some strange things purporting to be Simonds. This one is indeed Simonds but with a much modified tooth pattern:

    Weird Simonds tooth pattern.jpg

    I think it was a 5 1/2ppi rip saw converted to a coarse crosscut pattern. I think it sold for over US$50. Very surprising.

    However this one takes the cake:

    Custom Simonds.jpgCustom Simonds 4.jpgCustom Simonds 5.jpg

    It was listed at US$15 and has immediately gone to US$152. The handle is held on by nuts and bolts (not hand saw screws) some of which are missing and I completely fail to see the attraction in the handle and a star that would be better suited to a gun holster on a cowboy's belt.

    The most surprising thing of all is that two people think this saw is wonderful. The only thing good about it is that the saw plate has plenty of depth and there is a faint etch there not that I could clearly see it in the pix. It is probably an earlier No.10 as the later examples were medium width.

    Am I missing anything here with the pricing?

    Regards
    Paul
    Last edited by Bushmiller; 9th June 2017 at 06:12 PM. Reason: Trying to to place the funny tooth pattern in the right spot.
    Bushmiller;

    "Power tends to corrupt. Absolute power corrupts, absolutely!"

  7. #246
    Join Date
    Jun 2014
    Location
    Seattle, Washington, USA
    Posts
    1,857

    Default

    Wow... Yeah, I'm with you, Paul. Not seeing the draw. It's pretty unbelievable that someone would pay that much for it.

    Looks like a prime canvas for a reprint of Manet's "Luncheon on the Grass"...

    Cheers,
    Luke

  8. #247
    Join Date
    May 2016
    Location
    Perth
    Posts
    409

    Default

    It's value to collectors is that it was designed by David Bowie

  9. #248
    Join Date
    Nov 2004
    Location
    Millmerran,QLD
    Age
    73
    Posts
    11,138

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Fergiz01 View Post
    It's value to collectors is that it was designed by David Bowie
    Stardust?

    Regards
    Paul
    Bushmiller;

    "Power tends to corrupt. Absolute power corrupts, absolutely!"

  10. #249
    Join Date
    Nov 2011
    Location
    Melbourne
    Posts
    7,015

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Bushmiller View Post
    I see some strange things purporting to be Simonds. This one is indeed Simonds but with a much modified tooth pattern:

    Attachment 413806

    I think it was a 5 1/2ppi rip saw converted to a coarse crosscut pattern. I think it sold for over US$50. Very surprising.

    However this one takes the cake:

    Custom Simonds.jpgCustom Simonds 4.jpgCustom Simonds 5.jpg

    It was listed at US$15 and has immediately gone to US$152. The handle is held on by nuts and bolts (not hand saw screws) some of which are missing and I completely fail to see the attraction in the handle and a star that would be better suited to a gun holster on a cowboy's belt.

    The most surprising thing of all is that two people think this saw is wonderful. The only thing good about it is that the saw plate has plenty of depth and there is a faint etch there not that I could clearly see it in the pix. It is probably an earlier No.10 as the later examples were medium width.

    Am I missing anything here with the pricing?

    Regards
    Paul
    Each to there own Paul
    Any Punk would be proud to have that saw

    Cheers Matt

  11. #250
    Join Date
    Aug 2013
    Location
    Melbourne
    Posts
    47

    Default

    Rarest of the Rare WHEELER MADDEN & CLEMSON Star Saw



    I knew I'd seen one of these before, but the Simonds reference threw me...

    US$3086.... words fail me.


    Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

  12. #251
    Join Date
    Nov 2011
    Location
    Melbourne
    Posts
    7,015

    Default

    Is that $3086 US
    I've owned cars worth less lol


    Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

  13. #252
    Join Date
    Nov 2004
    Location
    Millmerran,QLD
    Age
    73
    Posts
    11,138

    Default

    We just renewed the insurance on our car for less than that today . Well nearly.

    However, this saw clearly has a Simonds saw plate, which makes it a hybrid. It probably looks like Swiss cheese under the handle. I see that the leading bidder has put in a second bid.

    OLD SIMONDS No.10 HAND SAW WITH WILD STAR HANDLE 8 TPI

    Rare or not, genuine or not, I still think it looks fugly!


    Thanks TimmyM.

    Regards
    Paul
    Bushmiller;

    "Power tends to corrupt. Absolute power corrupts, absolutely!"

  14. #253
    Join Date
    Mar 2004
    Location
    Brisbane (western suburbs)
    Age
    77
    Posts
    12,136

    Default

    Fugly alright! If you peer closely at the enlarged view at the handle end, you can just make out the shadow of the much more conventional original.

    P'raps this was the Lone Ranger's firewood saw?

    Cheers,
    IW

  15. #254
    Join Date
    Nov 2011
    Location
    Melbourne
    Posts
    7,015

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by IanW View Post
    Fugly alright! If you peer closely at the enlarged view at the handle end, you can just make out the shadow of the much more conventional original.

    P'raps this was the Lone Ranger's firewood saw?

    Cheers,
    Ian
    I tip my hat to you.
    And here was I just about to ask for a credit on my wage for the next year.
    From my boss

    Cheers Matt

  16. #255
    Join Date
    Nov 2004
    Location
    Millmerran,QLD
    Age
    73
    Posts
    11,138

    Default

    Well, if I had not bashed by head yet again resulting in some damaged tissue, I would be scratching it really, really hard. Our "Star" saw which clearly wasn't a WMC Star saw, and as IanW observed had a replacement handle as when studied carefully the old handle mark can still be seen just sold for:

    US$1025.00!!

    To my mind the sawplate and the handle have to be regarded separately. The plate was worth $25 (if you were feeling generous) so that makes the handle alone $1000! Could be a record for just a handle

    Regards
    Paul
    Bushmiller;

    "Power tends to corrupt. Absolute power corrupts, absolutely!"

Similar Threads

  1. Simonds Back Saws
    By Bushmiller in forum HAND TOOLS - UNPOWERED
    Replies: 11
    Last Post: 25th August 2014, 07:05 AM
  2. A couple of Simonds rescues.
    By Bushmiller in forum HAND TOOLS - UNPOWERED
    Replies: 4
    Last Post: 21st August 2014, 02:51 PM
  3. Interesting Saw On eBay - Simonds
    By Morbius in forum HAND TOOLS - UNPOWERED
    Replies: 8
    Last Post: 25th September 2013, 06:59 AM
  4. Sad story
    By Christopha in forum WOODIES JOKES
    Replies: 2
    Last Post: 30th July 2004, 10:46 PM

Tags for this Thread

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •