Thanks: 0
Likes: 0
Needs Pictures: 0
Picture(s) thanks: 0
Results 1 to 10 of 10
Thread: Smoothing with a Low Angle Jack
-
31st October 2010, 03:27 PM #1GOLD MEMBER
- Join Date
- Mar 2009
- Location
- Sydney
- Age
- 37
- Posts
- 2,711
Smoothing with a Low Angle Jack
I'm trying to get my head around the differences between using a Low angle jack with a 38 degree iron, compared to a LA smoothing plane with the same degree iron, and the same mouth adjustment?
I understand that the LAJ is longer, so it will take more shavings/want to create a flat surface. Whereas the smoother is happy to go up and down the high points and it's not as long.
So for example I have got a flat surface - the smoother would just take enough off to create a finish ready surface? But how wouldn't a LAJ do this as the surface is already flat and doens't need to be flattened?
These are the only differences I can think of. Could someone please clarify?
The reason I ask besides out of curiousity, is that I am thinking of using my LAJ with a 38 degree iron (50 cutting angle) instead of sandpaper on a project i'm working on.
This is a question I have been thinking of for a while, and thought i'd finally ask.
Thanks for your help
Andy
-
31st October 2010 03:27 PM # ADSGoogle Adsense Advertisement
- Join Date
- Always
- Location
- Advertising world
- Age
- 2010
- Posts
- Many
-
31st October 2010, 04:39 PM #2
Hi Andy
You're on the right trail. Imagin trying to "level" a football field with a rake, you can easily get it smooth but you will have some hills and hollows (if it rails you get mountains and lakes. The rake is your smoother!
If you "level" your footy field with a tracktor with a wide blade its going to be way better and the hills and lakes will be smaller. Thats your Jack (LA or otherwise).
If you level it with a ground plane (realy wide lump of steel towed behind a tracktor then you will get it realy level, no hills or lakes. Thats your jointer (6,7 or 8).
The blade angle just stops tearout etc
Hope that helps put things in perspective. On a table top or door etc I start with my jointer then LAJ and then smoother, often the jointer does the lot, depends on timber type and how cranky the grain is.
Good luck
PS if its cranky then the last step is the scraper plane or hand scraper.
-
31st October 2010, 05:06 PM #3
Andy
The thing is that wood moves, and then it is not as flat as it might have been even only a couple of hours before.
Regards from Perth
DerekVisit www.inthewoodshop.com for tutorials on constructing handtools, handtool reviews, and my trials and tribulations with furniture builds.
-
31st October 2010, 05:23 PM #4GOLD MEMBER
- Join Date
- Mar 2009
- Location
- Sydney
- Age
- 37
- Posts
- 2,711
Thanks for the replies
I'm still a little confused to why a smoother will create a better finish than a LAJ with the same irons?
I'm very painful arnt I ?
-
31st October 2010, 05:42 PM #5SENIOR MEMBER
- Join Date
- Nov 2007
- Location
- Victoria
- Posts
- 734
I get your confusion ! Perhaps the texture/roughness of the timber wont be any different but the longer plane will produce less highs and lows ?
-
31st October 2010, 05:55 PM #6
If the surface is level I don't think it will make any difference as long as the mouth on your jack or jointer is closed up to a similar mouth as your smoother.
Maybe this is the diff between a normal jack etc to a LA's, you get the added benifit of an adjustable mouth.
-
31st October 2010, 06:24 PM #7
The surface only appears level and flat. In reality it is not.
Both have to get to the valley. A long jointer will be forced to ride the peaks, and have to remove more wood to smooth the bottom of the valley than a short smoother.
Both can smooth a board, but a jointer requires a flatter surface than a smoother to do so.
Once the board is "flat", both planes could conceivably do as good a job as the other. The smoother is preferred to the jointer for this purpose since it is more efficient. Further, smoothers being dedicated to smoothing are often built with just that purpose in mind, so they can offer a preferred cutting angle, while the jointer more often tends to be oriented to flattening, and the cutting angle is less an issue.
Regards from Perth
DerekVisit www.inthewoodshop.com for tutorials on constructing handtools, handtool reviews, and my trials and tribulations with furniture builds.
-
31st October 2010, 08:03 PM #8GOLD MEMBER
- Join Date
- Mar 2009
- Location
- Sydney
- Age
- 37
- Posts
- 2,711
It's making more sense...
Thanks for the diagram Derek
-
31st October 2010, 08:37 PM #9Member
- Join Date
- Feb 2010
- Location
- New england NSW
- Posts
- 74
Planes
I beleive we are being confused between flat or true and smooth.
A smoother will give a better finish becaust the iron is at a greater angle. Your low angle plane is good for end grain but it is possibte for it to get under the grain and lift small pieces out.
Rowley.
-
31st October 2010, 09:13 PM #10GOLD MEMBER
- Join Date
- Mar 2009
- Location
- Sydney
- Age
- 37
- Posts
- 2,711
Similar Threads
-
Veritas Low Angle Jack for me!!!
By Buzzer in forum HAND TOOLS - UNPOWEREDReplies: 22Last Post: 26th March 2006, 02:40 PM -
Flattening wood faces: low-angle jack vs. 4 1/2 smoothing plane
By lyptus in forum HAND TOOLS - UNPOWEREDReplies: 22Last Post: 29th March 2005, 03:48 AM -
Bridge City Low Angle Smoothing Plane
By DPB in forum HAND TOOLS - UNPOWEREDReplies: 6Last Post: 24th August 2003, 09:10 PM