Thanks: 0
Needs Pictures: 0
Picture(s) thanks: 0
Results 1 to 11 of 11
Thread: Spurs or no spurs
-
22nd February 2020, 11:07 AM #1GOLD MEMBER
- Join Date
- Oct 2018
- Location
- Dandenong Ranges
- Posts
- 1,892
Spurs or no spurs
Hi all. Reading other threads on why some brace bits have spurs and some don't provided lots of opinions and preferences but not much surety. My recent purchase of some "random" Irwin bits may help. Looking at the attached photos (especially if you zoom in) you will see, as did I when I cleaned them, that the bits with no spurs are stamped "endbor" and the bits with spurs are stamped "mainbor". Is this just marketing or design?
20200221_155639.jpg20200221_155715.jpg
-
22nd February 2020 11:07 AM # ADSGoogle Adsense Advertisement
- Join Date
- Always
- Location
- Advertising world
- Posts
- Many
-
24th February 2020, 10:21 AM #2
As you say, MA, there is plenty of opinion & anecdote wrt to the spurs but very little original informatin from manufacturers o what they thought they were providing. We were taught that the spurs were for softwoods (as in conifers) & the plain bits were for hardwoods. I later came to doubt that & formed the opinion that the spurs are simply to make cleaner holes and the plain bits for rougher work. In many instances I find the holes they make aren't any rougher than I get with spurred bits & they are are easier to maintain so I don't find an overwhelming difference.
Your information leans me to a new opinion, that the spurs are of best use when drilling into side grain & the plain bits for end-grain. It makes sense to me, because I can see how severing fibres helps when boring side-grain, & that spurs don't do anything useful when boring end-grain since the fibres are vertical & all have to be severed by the cutting edge of the bit. Since softwoods generally have longer fibres than hardwoods, I guess the two ideas are not incompatible.
All of which is simply more anecdote & opinion, of course......
Cheers,IW
-
24th February 2020, 11:15 AM #3
Ian has accurately identified the "received wisdom"on spurs or no spurs. I must say that I have never found the soft/hard distinction very convincing in practice. Nor have I found the clean/rough distinction helpful - my holes with spurless bits have been so rough as to be unusable, but that may just be my bad technique or that I am doing furniture work, not house building or fencing!
The idea that the spurless are for use on end grain is interesting and I may give it a go, since otherwise my spurless bits are , frankly, just taking up room in my toolbox.Cheers
Jeremy
If it were done when 'tis done, then 'twere well it were done quickly
-
24th February 2020, 02:48 PM #4GOLD MEMBER
- Join Date
- Jun 2005
- Location
- Helensburgh
- Posts
- 7,696
A discussion on spurs and no spurs here, Leo is a superb craftsman and definitely know what he is talkng about. His large joinery work is an art form I reckon. Go to 11 minutes in, The URL for that won't capture.
CHRIS
-
24th February 2020, 05:18 PM #5SENIOR MEMBER
- Join Date
- May 2019
- Location
- Adelaide
- Age
- 63
- Posts
- 500
Plenty of explanation re Spurs here.
What are the different auger bit patterns? - Wonkee Donkee Tools
-
25th February 2020, 10:34 AM #6Try not to be late, but never be early.
- Join Date
- Apr 2011
- Location
- Bakers Hill WA
- Age
- 75
- Posts
- 1,077
MA, is there any other branding on your bits other than mainbor and endbor? Without having any examples I'd assume they're made by the same outfit and the brands allude to the manufacturers purpose of the bit. Ian and jmk89 have covered it pretty well, my opinion is the hard/soft wood is USA and British terminology and has little relevance on many of our Aus' timbers.
The wonkee donkee site is aptly named, their item on the Cook pattern and mention of Gedge as an American term is back to front. Cook was the original USA patentee (17th June 1851 Pat No 8162) Gedge was an agent in Britain who patented it there on Cooks behalf. Therefore "Cook" in USA and "Gedge" in UK.
Cheers,
Geoff.
-
25th February 2020, 10:19 PM #7GOLD MEMBER
- Join Date
- Oct 2018
- Location
- Dandenong Ranges
- Posts
- 1,892
Hi all. Geoff, bits have "Irwin" inside a rectangle and "USA" on them. Ian, I tried using the spurred version on end grain (because it was the only type in the size required and it required a bit of pressure to keep it moving. Jeremy, I am hoping this means the spurless bits were not a waste of money also. Ian, the accumulated experience on this forum is why I spend so much time on it. And it's always nice to post a thread that generates interest from others.
-
25th February 2020, 10:39 PM #8GOLD MEMBER
- Join Date
- Oct 2018
- Location
- Dandenong Ranges
- Posts
- 1,892
Hi Chris. I had a look at the video but couldn't find the discussion regarding spurs/no spurs?
-
26th February 2020, 09:23 AM #9
I didn't see any explanation of the reasons/principals involved either. I only started viewing just before the time Chris suggested, where he takes the lead-screw & spur(s) off a long bit, and altered the cutters. He mentions a couple of times afterwards that it made it easier to keep the bit running true, but gave no explanation of why. He was boring cross-grain, which is where I would have expected the spurs to be mot useful, but I got the impression that his primary concern was keeping the hole straight rather than neat.
From the smatterings I've read over the years, drill bit design is a rather arcane science & much of it seems counter-intuitive to my simple brain. I would have expected the modified bit in the video to be a beast of a thing to keep going in a straight line across the grain, but it appeared to do the job nicely. So-called "D-bits" are another example; used for boring & reaming very accurate holes in metal. They look like they'd go every which way but straight, but clearly don't. And the "spoon bits" used by chair makers - I couldn't have dreamed up one of those in several lifetimes!!
Cheers,IW
-
26th February 2020, 02:03 PM #10
I will go along with what Ian has said, simply because he is usually right!
There was also a cost element involved - spurs were more difficult (read expensive) to produce.
And I will add a caveat if you buy used bits. Beware of bits where someone has "sharpened" the wrong side of the spur. Spurs should only be sharpened on the inside radius.
-
26th February 2020, 05:49 PM #11Try not to be late, but never be early.
- Join Date
- Apr 2011
- Location
- Bakers Hill WA
- Age
- 75
- Posts
- 1,077
Leo probably could have got away with filing three sides of the lead screw to leave a more or less threadless point, which would still give him a centre point but virtually nil aggression.
The result he referred to as a "barefoot" bit is listed in both Mathiesons 1933 and James Swan 1920 catalogues as " ship" augers. Swan offered them both with and without a lead screw.
I've been told that it was usual practice to chop a pilot hole with a chisel to start the screwless version.
Cheers,
Geoff.
Similar Threads
-
Record 405 multiplane - slitting cutters - Do the Veritas spurs fit?
By woodPixel in forum HAND TOOLS - UNPOWEREDReplies: 8Last Post: 1st January 2020, 01:19 AM -
Nickers/scoring spurs
By jmk89 in forum HAND TOOLS - UNPOWEREDReplies: 2Last Post: 27th December 2006, 05:57 AM