Page 2 of 2 FirstFirst 12
Results 16 to 24 of 24
  1. #16
    Join Date
    Nov 2004
    Location
    Millmerran,QLD
    Age
    73
    Posts
    11,136

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by dubrosa22 View Post
    Types 13/14 are generally considered to be the best type for Stanley bench planes. They have all the best features and the degradation in production quality began shortly afterwards. Plus folks really dig the Sweetheart logo on the iron.

    Personally I prefer the low-knob and smaller brass adjuster of a Type 11.

    V
    dubrosa

    I have started to clean up some of the removable parts including the blade assembly. I was looking for a logo of some description, but so far I have not seen anything at all.

    Regards
    Paul
    Bushmiller;

    "Power tends to corrupt. Absolute power corrupts, absolutely!"

  2. # ADS
    Google Adsense Advertisement
    Join Date
    Always
    Location
    Advertising world
    Age
    2010
    Posts
    Many





     
  3. #17
    Join Date
    Nov 2004
    Location
    Millmerran,QLD
    Age
    73
    Posts
    11,136

    Default

    The plane has quite a lot of greasy gunk around it as you can see in this pic. The good side is that everything has come apart very easily. The frog screws were tight and I needed a more powerful screwdriver to persuade them to release. Other than that it has been good so far.

    P1090236.jpg

    There is still grease around the logo on the lever cap, but the textured background mentioned in the links is visible.

    P1090237.jpgP1090238.jpg

    When I get a moment, I will hit these bits with degreaser. I think this plane will come up fairly well for a tool that is only just shy of 100 years old, if 1925 is correct.

    Regards
    Paul
    Bushmiller;

    "Power tends to corrupt. Absolute power corrupts, absolutely!"

  4. #18
    Join Date
    Nov 2011
    Location
    Melbourne
    Posts
    7,014

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Bushmiller View Post
    The plane has quite a lot of greasy gunk around it as you can see in this pic. The good side is that everything has come apart very easily. The frog screws were tight and I needed a more powerful screwdriver to persuade them to release. Other than that it has been good so far.

    P1090236.jpg

    There is still grease around the logo on the lever cap, but the textured background mentioned in the links is visible.

    P1090237.jpgP1090238.jpg

    When I get a moment, I will hit these bits with degreaser. I think this plane will come up fairly well for a tool that is only just shy of 100 years old, if 1925 is correct.

    Regards
    Paul
    Paul,

    What’s going on , what happened too the famous Ute back drop for all your pictures,?

    Or is that just for the Flat believers only(Saws [emoji6]).

    Cheers Matt.

  5. #19
    Join Date
    Apr 2006
    Location
    Hobart
    Posts
    5,130

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Bushmiller View Post
    I think this plane will come up fairly well for a tool that is only just shy of 100 years old, if 1925 is correct.
    Nice. You will need to start saving your pennies for a bottle of port for its one hundredth birthday.
    Product - Seppeltsfield Barossa

  6. #20
    Join Date
    Nov 2004
    Location
    Millmerran,QLD
    Age
    73
    Posts
    11,136

    Default

    Oh! Sounds expensive. I might wait for some bad weather...... "Any port in a storm"

    Regards
    Paul
    Bushmiller;

    "Power tends to corrupt. Absolute power corrupts, absolutely!"

  7. #21
    Join Date
    Apr 2006
    Location
    Hobart
    Posts
    5,130

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Bushmiller View Post
    Oh! Sounds expensive.
    But its one hundredth birthday is not a time for penny pinching!

  8. #22
    Join Date
    Nov 2004
    Location
    Millmerran,QLD
    Age
    73
    Posts
    11,136

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Simplicity View Post
    Paul,

    What’s going on , what happened too the famous Ute back drop for all your pictures,?

    Or is that just for the Flat believers only(Saws [emoji6]).

    Cheers Matt.
    Matt

    It was there. Edited out for a close up shot. Sometimes I use the tray as a bench for display, but it got to 39.7°C yesterday and the checker plate was too hot to touch!

    Regards
    Paul
    Bushmiller;

    "Power tends to corrupt. Absolute power corrupts, absolutely!"

  9. #23
    Join Date
    Mar 2004
    Location
    Brisbane (western suburbs)
    Age
    77
    Posts
    12,132

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Bushmiller View Post
    ..... it got to 39.7°C yesterday and the checker plate was too hot to touch! ....
    Yairs, been a bit less than ideal in my shed the last few days - we were a little 'cooler' down here at only 38, but the humidity probably more than made up for the difference! It's the sort of weather that makes you break out in a sweat just thinking about doing anything other than stand in front of a fan.

    The discomfort level finally provoked me into mounting my big shed fan on a swing-arm instead of its fixed position on the wall, so I could direct it wherever I was working - it is something I've been getting around to for about 10 years. Anyway, I started in the cool of the morning, expecting the job to take no more than an hour, but it managed to spin out to more than 2 hours which included turning the shed upside down looking for one of the bolts that attach the fan cage to its wall-mounting bracket, becoming increasingly frustrated & heat-stressed. I eventually found it, stuck to the motor housing - my heat-fogged brain forgot about the permanent magnets in the motor. It can clutch a small bolt quite firmly!

    Today promises to be another stinker, but at least I can point my fan where I want now...

    Cheers,
    IW

  10. #24
    Join Date
    Nov 2004
    Location
    Millmerran,QLD
    Age
    73
    Posts
    11,136

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by IanW View Post
    Yairs, been a bit less than ideal in my shed the last few days - we were a little 'cooler' down here at only 38, but the humidity probably more than made up for the difference! It's the sort of weather that makes you break out in a sweat just thinking about doing anything other than stand in front of a fan.

    The discomfort level finally provoked me into mounting my big shed fan on a swing-arm instead of its fixed position on the wall, so I could direct it wherever I was working - it is something I've been getting around to for about 10 years. Anyway, I started in the cool of the morning, expecting the job to take no more than an hour, but it managed to spin out to more than 2 hours which included turning the shed upside down looking for one of the bolts that attach the fan cage to its wall-mounting bracket, becoming increasingly frustrated & heat-stressed. I eventually found it, stuck to the motor housing - my heat-fogged brain forgot about the permanent magnets in the motor. It can clutch a small bolt quite firmly!

    Today promises to be another stinker, but at least I can point my fan where I want now...

    Cheers,
    Ian

    I think the humidity you experience in your neck of the woods would more than counteract the lower temperatures.

    On the subject of fans, I have one in my shed that I set up a few years ago. Last year I did not use it once and I don't really know why because there was ample justification with the weather. Yesterday I was up early and outside just after 0530Hrs in an attempt to get some welding done on a steel frame before the heat of the day set in. It was > 30°C by 0830hrs and I was starting to melt. I went inside to cool down for a while and then returned to the shed and decided to turn on the fan. I had forgotten how powerful it was. Even with the bench grinder partially obscuring the wind flow it was still good.

    P1090239.jpgP1090240.jpg

    Perhaps you and I should start a fan club.

    Regards
    Paul
    Bushmiller;

    "Power tends to corrupt. Absolute power corrupts, absolutely!"

Page 2 of 2 FirstFirst 12

Similar Threads

  1. VICTORIA Stanley & Union Transitional, Stanley No.2, Mujingfang, Coffin Smoother and More
    By thumbsucker in forum WOODWORK - Tools & Machinery
    Replies: 16
    Last Post: 13th October 2022, 03:12 PM
  2. N.S.W. Stanley 78, Stanley 9-1/2 and Stanley 75 USA Cast Iron Planes
    By Scribbly Gum in forum WOODWORK - Tools & Machinery
    Replies: 8
    Last Post: 23rd May 2021, 07:43 PM
  3. DONE: Swap Stanley 196 for Stanley 51 plane and 52 shoot board
    By Pac man in forum SWAP OR FREE
    Replies: 0
    Last Post: 11th January 2021, 11:17 PM
  4. Replies: 0
    Last Post: 3rd September 2019, 08:13 AM

Tags for this Thread

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •