Thanks: 0
Likes: 0
Needs Pictures: 0
Picture(s) thanks: 0
Results 61 to 75 of 212
Thread: $199 gmc thicknesser bargain
-
21st May 2006, 07:00 PM #61SENIOR MEMBER
- Join Date
- Nov 2005
- Location
- adelaide
- Posts
- 667
not a gmc but!!!!!!!!!
went all over town looking for a gmc but they were all gone BUT....... found an ozito( bunnings marion) that was 100 dollars more and 3 year replacement warranty and its got the anti kick back and the suction attachment the same as the ryobi looked up the spec on the internet www.ozito.com.au/productinfo.aspx?prodid=ptg-971 they even quote a ryobi part number for replacement blades.
update today they got the new shipment of gmc in and they are 365 but still no anti kick back or vacuum attachment
-
21st May 2006 07:00 PM # ADSGoogle Adsense Advertisement
- Join Date
- Always
- Location
- Advertising world
- Posts
- Many
-
21st May 2006, 07:14 PM #62
tonysa - asks "Masoth - did you end up getting one too ?"
One will be put aside, with my name on it to buy/or not in early June - local Bunnings staff say they will ring.
-
21st May 2006, 07:23 PM #63Originally Posted by tanii51
<TABLE id=tblSpec style="BORDER-TOP- BORDER-LEFT- BORDER-BOTTOM- 535px; BORDER-COLLAPSE: collapse; BORDER-RIGHT- 0px" cellSpacing=0 cellPadding=0 align=center border=0><TBODY><TR vAlign=top><TD class=productSpecTableText style="BACKGROUND-COLOR: #f2f2f2" width="50%">Anti kickback teeth</TD><TD class=productSpecTableText style="BACKGROUND-COLOR: #e5e5e5" width="50%">Prevents anti kickback increasing user safety</TD></TR></TBODY></TABLE>
If you prefer to buy the GMC @ $199, try forwarding a copy of my post (#53) of two days ago, to Bunnings, Marion.
-
23rd May 2006, 06:25 PM #64Banned
- Join Date
- May 2005
- Location
- Burnett Heads, QLD
- Age
- 64
- Posts
- 1,535
Originally Posted by doug the slug
I am making the bench so that the outfeed extension table from the jointer is the infeed extension table for the thicknesser. im hoping it will be long enough for 99.9% of the work and for the other bit i will just have to lift one machine out at a time.
-
23rd May 2006, 06:37 PM #65Originally Posted by masoth
-
23rd May 2006, 06:37 PM #66
Keep the lower plate slippery - I found after a while the thicknesser needed a hand getting work through - thought it was wearing out or something. Lubricated the bed, and hey presto, it's back to working great!
One of these days I must replace the cheap blades with something decent- but it seems to still be doing a good job, so can't justify the time and effort.
Enjoy.
Now all I need is a jointer. (All I need - did I really say that?????)"Clear, Ease Springs"
www.Stu's Shed.com
-
23rd May 2006, 06:38 PM #67Originally Posted by Auld Bassoon"Clear, Ease Springs"
www.Stu's Shed.com
-
23rd May 2006, 07:20 PM #68
Steve B
Spoil sport. Because I was quotiing I chose to not take licence to install the hyphen to properly change the message to negative.
Betcha most didn't notice - nah na nah na.
-
23rd May 2006, 07:33 PM #69Banned
- Join Date
- May 2005
- Location
- Burnett Heads, QLD
- Age
- 64
- Posts
- 1,535
does anyone have any idea why the roller on the infeed and outfeed tables on this beast are approx 1.5mm above what seems to be a pretty uniform flat surface as far as pressed metal is concerned? should i adjust them or is itdone like that for a reason?
-
23rd May 2006, 08:54 PM #70
My neighbor over the back fence had a win the other day.......
He had broken his 6 month old GMC Thicknesser somehow and took it back to local bunnies for replacement on warranty....
No problem says they...here is your new, replacement unit........AND.......
here is a handful of cash too :eek: which is the difference between his (full retail) price and the $199 special price.
You think he was a happy chappy?
Unfortunately I am already the owner of a Ryobi one which I reckon is the same thing, just a different colour.
Regards
Neil.Life should NOT be a journey to the grave with the intention of arriving safely in an attractive and well preserved body, but rather to skid in sideways - Chardonay in one hand - Strawberries in the other, body thoroughly used up, totally worn out and screaming - "WOO WOO...What a ride"
-
23rd May 2006, 09:56 PM #71Banned
- Join Date
- May 2005
- Location
- Burnett Heads, QLD
- Age
- 64
- Posts
- 1,535
well i ran a piece of pine stud through the thicknesser, that worked so well i ran a piece of silky oak through the thicknesser,then i set up the jointer (yeah yeah i l know you do it the other way around but ive had the jointer for a week and a half now so i had already done some with it) then i jointed some cedar and some jacaranda and im about to go back and thickness them too! this is great!!! how did i ever get along without them??
-
23rd May 2006, 10:14 PM #72
-
23rd May 2006, 11:31 PM #73
good stuff doug, you got one at the right price too
re the rollers, it sure beats me why they're higher than the tables.
i ended up doing something similar to stuart but using some melamine board instead of the ali.
might end up taking the rollers off completely
cheers
tony
-
23rd May 2006, 11:32 PM #74Senior Member
- Join Date
- Mar 2006
- Location
- Perth
- Age
- 57
- Posts
- 338
Doug- Did you work out why the infeed and outfeed tables were above the flat surface?
Regards
GraemeGraeme
-
25th May 2006, 11:26 AM #75Member
- Join Date
- Aug 2005
- Location
- Central Coast NSW
- Posts
- 87
Bunnings Tuggerah GMC Thicknesser
Was told by staff that three pallets will be coming in today. priced at $199.
Similar Threads
-
GMC Thicknesser blades
By echnidna in forum GENERAL & SMALL MACHINERYReplies: 21Last Post: 5th July 2012, 11:01 AM -
GMC Thicknesser $199
By aabb in forum JOINTERS, MOULDERS, THICKNESSERS, ETCReplies: 1Last Post: 2nd April 2006, 11:46 PM -
GMC Thicknesser
By STEPHEN MILLER in forum JOINTERS, MOULDERS, THICKNESSERS, ETCReplies: 14Last Post: 6th April 2005, 07:22 PM -
GMC Thicknesser Dust Collection
By hingston in forum JOINTERS, MOULDERS, THICKNESSERS, ETCReplies: 16Last Post: 19th January 2005, 11:32 PM -
GMC thicknesser
By George in forum JOINTERS, MOULDERS, THICKNESSERS, ETCReplies: 3Last Post: 7th December 2003, 10:28 AM