Thanks Thanks:  0
Likes Likes:  0
Needs Pictures Needs Pictures:  0
Picture(s) thanks Picture(s) thanks:  0
Results 1 to 10 of 10
  1. #1
    Join Date
    Mar 2009
    Location
    Lyonville
    Posts
    209

    Default thicknesser tables fixed vs moving

    Why are so many thicknessers made so that the table moves and not the cutting head?

    When I want to dress a bunch of wood I don't want to have to change the height of in feed and out feed rollers that I have setup to support the ends of the long pieces of wood I regularly work with.

    It seems more logical that the cutter head move. I often do pieces 3 or more metres longs so I must use rollers to support the wood as it moves into and out of a thicknesser. If I was to get one of the thicknessers where the table moves every pass I would have to increase the height of my infeed roller and outfeed roller table.

    I've done over 12m3 of wood through a friends 15" carbatec thicknesser and I've got a job coming up where I could need another 15m3 dressed. So I'm thinking about getting my own but don't want to get a carbatec because I'm not happy with the build quality. However, all the better quality "industrial" models seem to have a moving table and that would just be a pain have to make all the roller adjustments rather than just the cutter head.

    Can anyone tell me why so many are made this way and a good model where the table is fixed?

  2. # ADS
    Google Adsense Advertisement
    Join Date
    Always
    Location
    Advertising world
    Posts
    Many





     
  3. #2
    Join Date
    Jan 2011
    Location
    Port Macquarie
    Posts
    128

    Default

    I have an old Carbatec model SA406 which is a 15" dual speed thicknesser. 2 HP used once to plane a small table top. I has a fixed base and the head rises and falls with a chain mechanism. Very heavy and made in Taiwan, no rust, kept inside a workshop in the house. Have upgraded to a combination machine. PM me if interested, I am about to list but haven't got around to photos

  4. #3
    Join Date
    Aug 2008
    Location
    Melbourne
    Age
    34
    Posts
    6,127

    Default

    I think the simple answer as to why is that it would be an engineering nightmare for a few reasons:

    Most, if not all, industrial thicknessers have the motor mounted in the base so moving the head and feed roller assembly would require either the motor to move as well or a very robust idler pulley system to keep the drive belts properly tensioned.

    It's easier to move one table that weighs maybe 35-50kg instead of the feed/cutter/motor system which would weigh well over double that (a 24" cutter weighs close to 50kg on its own)

    Keeping the whole lot properly aligned would be harder

    And finally, less moving parts mean less things to go wrong

    The only industrial one of this design that I can find on Google is the MIDA D-MAX and they don't have an Australian distributor, only New Zealand

  5. #4
    Join Date
    Mar 2009
    Location
    Lyonville
    Posts
    209

    Default

    Ok so the machine is easier to build but how do people use them effectively.

    For short (<1.5m?) pieces you might not have to bother with supplementary infeed and out feed rollers but for anything of any length it is going to need support going in and coming out.

    How do people use thicknessers where the table moves? Do they just get supplementary rollers about the right height and don't worry about it or do they adjust extra rollers every time they wind up the table?

    For the setup I have been using we had one roller stand at the front adjusted to be level with the table and a 12 roller roller table 2.5m long at the back. Without this it would not be possible to do the 2m, 3m, 6m legnths that we regularly put through the machine.

  6. #5
    Join Date
    Aug 2008
    Location
    Melbourne
    Age
    34
    Posts
    6,127

    Default

    You don't need roller tables. Just hold the end of the piece as it goes in about 1/3 of the way then walk around to the back and hold the other end as it comes out. The pressure of the feed rollers is sufficient to take care of the rest.

  7. #6
    Join Date
    Mar 2009
    Location
    Lyonville
    Posts
    209

    Default

    I can see putting up with that for a few sticks but not for the quantities that I want to do.

    1 having to hold each piece while it comes through would be horrid on my back if doing for a whole day.
    2 I often do the thinking with a second person and our rhythm of work would need to be much slower if we couldn't rely on the extra rollers.
    3 while in theory all you have to do is support one side then the other I think it would be too easy for an accident to happen. I once saw a thicknesser tip because they did not get,round to the other side quickly enough. It was ugly both to the machine and the work piece.

  8. #7
    Join Date
    Feb 2010
    Location
    New england NSW
    Posts
    74

    Default Thicknesser support

    If you are having trioule with supporting your work fix one end of the suports to the moveing tables, I had a set up on the outfeed side that moved up and down with the table and it worked well, I just walked the in feed in and there was no trouble. It is important to control the in feed so as to keep the work in line with the part of the cutterhead you want to use.
    Rowley.

  9. #8
    Join Date
    Jun 2007
    Location
    Blue Mountains
    Posts
    817

    Default

    For the kind of work you're talking about, I can see why you'd want a fixed table height. Carbatec had both options when I bought mine. One had the motor mounted under the machine, with rollers on the top for holding stock. The other had the motor on the top, with a fixed lower table. I decided I liked the ability to put the timber on the rollers on the top of the machine between passes. I have very little need to run pieces over 2 metres through the machine, so I find it easy enough to feed it in, and then move to the rear to support it on the exit.

    It's been a while since I got mine, but both options were available then. Hope you find what you're looking for.

    ajw

  10. #9
    Join Date
    Oct 2006
    Location
    Melbourne
    Posts
    5,271

    Default

    To speed up adjustment of an out-feed support roller, how about afixing a cheap laser pointer to the roller stand so it shines down the surface of the thicky table, or points to a spot just below it?
    .
    I know you believe you understand what you think I wrote, but I'm not sure you realize that what you just read is not what I meant.


    Regards, Woodwould.

  11. #10
    Join Date
    Aug 2009
    Location
    Armadale Perth WA
    Age
    55
    Posts
    4,524

    Default

    I think what you might need is ingenuity re the in- and out-feed.

    When my other half had a major back surgery, I felt that it was my duty to photograph the neat adjustable examination beds.

    They adjusted by an electric hydraulic drive I think.

    Might give you some ideas?

    Cheers,
    Paul McGee
    Attached Images Attached Images

Similar Threads

  1. I fixed the snipe problems in my thicknesser !
    By JDarvall in forum JOINTERS, MOULDERS, THICKNESSERS, ETC
    Replies: 38
    Last Post: 23rd June 2013, 10:56 AM
  2. Fix it! (Moving to fixed gantry)
    By pippin88 in forum CNC Machines
    Replies: 0
    Last Post: 19th February 2012, 09:39 PM
  3. Can this be fixed?
    By Tiger in forum NOTHING AT ALL TO DO WITH WOODWORK
    Replies: 4
    Last Post: 8th January 2010, 09:40 PM
  4. moving a planer thicknesser
    By jow104 in forum JOINTERS, MOULDERS, THICKNESSERS, ETC
    Replies: 10
    Last Post: 6th April 2004, 07:04 PM
  5. Can it be fixed?
    By craigb in forum HAND TOOLS - POWERED
    Replies: 9
    Last Post: 28th January 2004, 01:38 PM

Tags for this Thread

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •