Thanks: 0
Likes: 0
Needs Pictures: 0
Picture(s) thanks: 0
Results 1 to 10 of 10
-
4th April 2012, 03:47 PM #1Senior Member
- Join Date
- Mar 2009
- Location
- Lyonville
- Posts
- 209
thicknesser tables fixed vs moving
Why are so many thicknessers made so that the table moves and not the cutting head?
When I want to dress a bunch of wood I don't want to have to change the height of in feed and out feed rollers that I have setup to support the ends of the long pieces of wood I regularly work with.
It seems more logical that the cutter head move. I often do pieces 3 or more metres longs so I must use rollers to support the wood as it moves into and out of a thicknesser. If I was to get one of the thicknessers where the table moves every pass I would have to increase the height of my infeed roller and outfeed roller table.
I've done over 12m3 of wood through a friends 15" carbatec thicknesser and I've got a job coming up where I could need another 15m3 dressed. So I'm thinking about getting my own but don't want to get a carbatec because I'm not happy with the build quality. However, all the better quality "industrial" models seem to have a moving table and that would just be a pain have to make all the roller adjustments rather than just the cutter head.
Can anyone tell me why so many are made this way and a good model where the table is fixed?
-
4th April 2012 03:47 PM # ADSGoogle Adsense Advertisement
- Join Date
- Always
- Location
- Advertising world
- Posts
- Many
-
4th April 2012, 11:14 PM #2Senior Member
- Join Date
- Jan 2011
- Location
- Port Macquarie
- Posts
- 128
I have an old Carbatec model SA406 which is a 15" dual speed thicknesser. 2 HP used once to plane a small table top. I has a fixed base and the head rises and falls with a chain mechanism. Very heavy and made in Taiwan, no rust, kept inside a workshop in the house. Have upgraded to a combination machine. PM me if interested, I am about to list but haven't got around to photos
-
6th April 2012, 01:09 AM #3Taking a break
- Join Date
- Aug 2008
- Location
- Melbourne
- Age
- 34
- Posts
- 6,127
I think the simple answer as to why is that it would be an engineering nightmare for a few reasons:
Most, if not all, industrial thicknessers have the motor mounted in the base so moving the head and feed roller assembly would require either the motor to move as well or a very robust idler pulley system to keep the drive belts properly tensioned.
It's easier to move one table that weighs maybe 35-50kg instead of the feed/cutter/motor system which would weigh well over double that (a 24" cutter weighs close to 50kg on its own)
Keeping the whole lot properly aligned would be harder
And finally, less moving parts mean less things to go wrong
The only industrial one of this design that I can find on Google is the MIDA D-MAX and they don't have an Australian distributor, only New Zealand
-
6th April 2012, 06:19 AM #4Senior Member
- Join Date
- Mar 2009
- Location
- Lyonville
- Posts
- 209
Ok so the machine is easier to build but how do people use them effectively.
For short (<1.5m?) pieces you might not have to bother with supplementary infeed and out feed rollers but for anything of any length it is going to need support going in and coming out.
How do people use thicknessers where the table moves? Do they just get supplementary rollers about the right height and don't worry about it or do they adjust extra rollers every time they wind up the table?
For the setup I have been using we had one roller stand at the front adjusted to be level with the table and a 12 roller roller table 2.5m long at the back. Without this it would not be possible to do the 2m, 3m, 6m legnths that we regularly put through the machine.
-
6th April 2012, 11:24 AM #5Taking a break
- Join Date
- Aug 2008
- Location
- Melbourne
- Age
- 34
- Posts
- 6,127
You don't need roller tables. Just hold the end of the piece as it goes in about 1/3 of the way then walk around to the back and hold the other end as it comes out. The pressure of the feed rollers is sufficient to take care of the rest.
-
7th April 2012, 05:55 AM #6Senior Member
- Join Date
- Mar 2009
- Location
- Lyonville
- Posts
- 209
I can see putting up with that for a few sticks but not for the quantities that I want to do.
1 having to hold each piece while it comes through would be horrid on my back if doing for a whole day.
2 I often do the thinking with a second person and our rhythm of work would need to be much slower if we couldn't rely on the extra rollers.
3 while in theory all you have to do is support one side then the other I think it would be too easy for an accident to happen. I once saw a thicknesser tip because they did not get,round to the other side quickly enough. It was ugly both to the machine and the work piece.
-
7th April 2012, 10:54 AM #7Member
- Join Date
- Feb 2010
- Location
- New england NSW
- Posts
- 74
Thicknesser support
If you are having trioule with supporting your work fix one end of the suports to the moveing tables, I had a set up on the outfeed side that moved up and down with the table and it worked well, I just walked the in feed in and there was no trouble. It is important to control the in feed so as to keep the work in line with the part of the cutterhead you want to use.
Rowley.
-
7th April 2012, 11:44 AM #8SENIOR MEMBER
- Join Date
- Jun 2007
- Location
- Blue Mountains
- Posts
- 817
For the kind of work you're talking about, I can see why you'd want a fixed table height. Carbatec had both options when I bought mine. One had the motor mounted under the machine, with rollers on the top for holding stock. The other had the motor on the top, with a fixed lower table. I decided I liked the ability to put the timber on the rollers on the top of the machine between passes. I have very little need to run pieces over 2 metres through the machine, so I find it easy enough to feed it in, and then move to the rear to support it on the exit.
It's been a while since I got mine, but both options were available then. Hope you find what you're looking for.
ajw
-
7th April 2012, 02:14 PM #9
To speed up adjustment of an out-feed support roller, how about afixing a cheap laser pointer to the roller stand so it shines down the surface of the thicky table, or points to a spot just below it?
.
I know you believe you understand what you think I wrote, but I'm not sure you realize that what you just read is not what I meant.
Regards, Woodwould.
-
17th April 2012, 02:25 PM #10
I think what you might need is ingenuity re the in- and out-feed.
When my other half had a major back surgery, I felt that it was my duty to photograph the neat adjustable examination beds.
They adjusted by an electric hydraulic drive I think.
Might give you some ideas?
Cheers,
Paul McGee
Similar Threads
-
I fixed the snipe problems in my thicknesser !
By JDarvall in forum JOINTERS, MOULDERS, THICKNESSERS, ETCReplies: 38Last Post: 23rd June 2013, 10:56 AM -
Fix it! (Moving to fixed gantry)
By pippin88 in forum CNC MachinesReplies: 0Last Post: 19th February 2012, 09:39 PM -
Can this be fixed?
By Tiger in forum NOTHING AT ALL TO DO WITH WOODWORKReplies: 4Last Post: 8th January 2010, 09:40 PM -
moving a planer thicknesser
By jow104 in forum JOINTERS, MOULDERS, THICKNESSERS, ETCReplies: 10Last Post: 6th April 2004, 07:04 PM -
Can it be fixed?
By craigb in forum HAND TOOLS - POWEREDReplies: 9Last Post: 28th January 2004, 01:38 PM