Results 1 to 7 of 7
  1. #1
    Join Date
    May 2018
    Location
    Melbourne
    Posts
    507

    Default Old Bailey No. 3 plane question

    I have an old No. 3 plane that was my grandfathers. There is no branding on it just an 'S' on the castings. Scribbly Gum suggested that it might be an early 1900's Bailey. The top of the frog is broken and there is no lateral adjuster which I presumed was because of the break. Scribbly has suggested that it might not in fact have had an adjuster.
    Does anybody know?
    Thanks
    20210827_153532.jpg

  2. # ADS
    Google Adsense Advertisement
    Join Date
    Always
    Location
    Advertising world
    Posts
    Many





     
  3. #2
    Join Date
    May 2016
    Location
    Blue Mountains, Australia
    Posts
    462

    Default

    I don't believe your no. 3 is a "pre-lat" (ie. Before the introduction of the lateral lever) judging by the casting details in your photo and the frog design.

    It is most likely what is now referred to as a "type 7" which apparently dates between 1893 and 1899. Pre-lat Stanleys are known as Type 5 and date between 1883 and 1885.
    Type 7s had the S cast on the sole and/or the frog and sometimes also the levercap.

    Here's a link to the Stanley Benchplane type study:
    Plane Feature Timeline

  4. #3
    Join Date
    May 2016
    Location
    Blue Mountains, Australia
    Posts
    462

    Default

    Here's my own type 7, No. 4 (with lateral adjuster which has three patent dates stamped and possibly its original iron with patent date 1892 stamped on it) with the same S casting on sole and also the levercap:
    IMG_20210828_073724-2304x1296.jpg

    This other illustrated Type Study is quite useful for seeing the visual changes across the types:
    The Valley Woodworker: Bob's illustrated Type study of Bailey bench planes. Part 1 The collector's models years

    The Types Studies are all limited to what is retrospectively observed changes to these planes - features, patent numbers, etc. but are definitely not set in stone.
    For instance my Type 7 No. 4 frog has the casting nib supposedly from a Type 6, instead of the S casting.
    I believe Stanley would have had parts bins with some older parts mixing with new parts during factory assembly on occasion, so we certainly see overlap of type features.

    V

  5. #4
    Join Date
    Sep 2008
    Location
    Petone, NZ
    Age
    68
    Posts
    2,818

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by dubrosa22 View Post
    ...This other illustrated Type Study is quite useful for seeing the visual changes across the types:
    The Valley Woodworker: Bob's illustrated Type study of Bailey bench planes. Part 1 The collector's models years...
    I've not seen that website before. I use the Rex Mill guide, but I don't seem to be able to get into that site at present (otherwise I'd have put up a link).

    As for the broken frog - if you want to use the plane and find the missing lateral a pain - finding a replacement type #7 frog may be difficult. As a temporary (or permanent) fix, a few models either side of the type #7 will have interchangeable frogs.

    But one tip worth noting is that Stanley carriage rebate planes No.10, No.10 1/4 & No.10 1/2 never changed to later types of frogs. So if you can find a broken No.10 etc - even one made into the 1960s - the frog will fit your No.3 (note this is one area Record did not copy Stanley - Record No.010 and No.010 1/2 planes have the later style frogs that will not fit your plane).

    HTH.

    Cheers, Vann.
    Gatherer of rusty planes tools...
    Proud member of the Wadkin Blockhead Club .

  6. #5
    Join Date
    Dec 2007
    Location
    Sydney
    Posts
    2,209

    Default

    Another couple of quick ways to check if a plane with a broken frog was prelateral is if there are any Patent dates in the adjusting wheel and whether it’s right or left hand thread.
    with a right hand thread you are turning it to the left to advance the iron which I guess they figured out was counterintuitive.
    Heres a few photos of my pre lat 5. Type 4 I think.
    I had 2 thru 8 prelats when I was a collector but this is a really nice user I picked up in Saskatoon in ‘92.
    H.
    Attached Images Attached Images
    Jimcracks for the rich and/or wealthy. (aka GKB '88)

  7. #6
    Join Date
    May 2018
    Location
    Melbourne
    Posts
    507

    Default

    Thanks for your feedback guys.
    The adjuster has a left hand thread and there are no markings on the adjusting wheel.
    Attached are further pictures of the frog. It seems to me to have been the lateral adjuster type. I will just have to make do with what I have.
    20210828_101759.jpg20210828_101810.jpg20210828_101817.jpg20210828_101833.jpg

  8. #7
    Join Date
    May 2016
    Location
    Blue Mountains, Australia
    Posts
    462

    Default

    There was a few days ago a spare frog for a no. 10 or 10½ for sale on fleaBay which, as Vann says above, is a good replacement for your broken frog, but it seems to have been purchased already as far as I can tell.

    You could try toolexchange.com.au
    V

Similar Threads

  1. Bailey plane parts
    By Brett57 in forum ANTIQUE AND COLLECTABLE TOOLS
    Replies: 16
    Last Post: 20th July 2021, 07:03 PM
  2. stanley/bailey plane
    By spokeshave in forum HAND TOOLS - UNPOWERED
    Replies: 32
    Last Post: 11th July 2013, 07:07 PM
  3. bailey plane,s age.
    By bluegum30 in forum HAND TOOLS - UNPOWERED
    Replies: 10
    Last Post: 14th September 2011, 06:52 PM
  4. Bailey/Stanley No 5 plane LAL question
    By schuld66 in forum HAND TOOLS - UNPOWERED
    Replies: 5
    Last Post: 16th August 2010, 11:54 PM
  5. Bailey pattern plane question
    By Randy Korr in forum HAND TOOLS - UNPOWERED
    Replies: 6
    Last Post: 25th January 2007, 11:49 AM

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •