Thanks Thanks:  0
Needs Pictures Needs Pictures:  0
Picture(s) thanks Picture(s) thanks:  0
Page 2 of 11 FirstFirst 1234567 ... LastLast
Results 16 to 30 of 155
  1. #16
    Join Date
    Apr 2009
    Location
    Hunter Valley NSW
    Age
    69
    Posts
    1,759

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Joost View Post
    I absolutely agree with your above statement!

    A double floor would complicate the build as well as make it heavier. A simple solution to keep internal volume to a minimum might be to have rather large flotation compartments in the bow and aft and also to box in the midseat. With the standard GIS gunwales, it shouldn’t float too high in the water but water will sit low in the boat and there should be a lot less of it.

    I think that SoG has the potential to become a classic (like its father) when using the same concept and design principles as behind the GIS. Being 3-4 ft. smaller, this boat will be a lot lighter and more manageable on land for one person than the Goat and easier to sail solo. It would be nice to see the same stuff that makes the Goat such an excellent craft back in this smaller boat:
    - same simple and effective construction methods as used in the GIS
    - very nice lines
    - good performance
    - versatility (the Goat is an excellent sail boat but it also rows quite nicely and can be used for cruising, raiding, camping trips, fishing etc.)
    - very light weight for its size
    - a lot more stable than one would expect at first sight

    I understand that after your unfortunate events with Raid41 your emphasis is on a boat that is easy to board after having it righted in case of a capsize. And of course it should be given thought but I don’t think it should become the overriding criteria.

    Anyway, just more thoughts that, I hope, help MIK in doing his thing.

    Best wishes, Joost

    P.S. I am even more ignorant than you, so our discussions here probably give MIK some good laughs!
    I agree Joost, except maybe that versatility need not be a criteria. Does SOG need to row well or be capable of carrying a small motor? Maybe not. If pure sailing performance and simple construction are the requirements, a different boat will result.

    What about a little bowsprit to make a jib and even an assymetric possible? Could this be made to work with an unstayed wooden mast?

  2. # ADS
    Google Adsense Advertisement
    Join Date
    Always
    Location
    Advertising world
    Age
    2010
    Posts
    Many





     
  3. #17
    Join Date
    Apr 2008
    Location
    Tilburg, the Netherlands
    Age
    51
    Posts
    519

    Default

    Able to carry a small motor: I don't think this would necessarily be a requirement.

    I am pretty sure that MIK will take care that the SoG hull will be very low drag under sail and will therefore also row quite well (as is the case with the GIS).

    A bow sprit and asymetric would overly complicate the boat, I think. And make it a lot more expensive as well. Just a balanced lug rig or standing lug with boom would be nice in my opinion.

    I am very curious what this design will look like when MIK is finished with it.

    Best regards, Joost

  4. #18
    Join Date
    Nov 2008
    Location
    Toronto, Canada
    Age
    44
    Posts
    131

    Default Camp Cruising Goat

    Having not yet completed my goat, I cant say that i have done any camp cruising. However, by this spring I hope to be able to tell you that she is a great camp cruiser. My plan is to have removable sleeping boards between the center thwart and rear seat tank this way there are minimal mods to the design. I figure a pair at about 18" each, one on either side of the center case will be fine for 1 or 2 people. I am going to make a boom tent, most likely out of polyethylene tarp and bug netting that will attach to snaps screwed every 6 inches or so, to the underside of the gunwale. There is a great deal of protected coastline (both the north and south shore of long island) very near me that I would love to be able to explore, but is officially off limits for camping. It is not, however, illegal to anchor in 2 to 3 feet of protected water between some sandbars in a bay, and pitch a boom tent. It'll be a while, but i'll post pics when i get there.
    Cheers,
    Al

  5. #19
    Join Date
    Apr 2009
    Location
    Hunter Valley NSW
    Age
    69
    Posts
    1,759

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Joost View Post

    A bow sprit and asymetric would overly complicate the boat, I think. And make it a lot more expensive as well. Just a balanced lug rig or standing lug with boom would be nice in my opinion.

    I am very curious what this design will look like when MIK is finished with it.

    Best regards, Joost
    It will be interesting, that's for sure. However, I'll have to disagree with you Joost. I've seen plenty of uncomplicated boats with bowsprits and jibs. Even 2 mast positions and a removable bowsprit could be made very simple with a little thought. Why not make it optional, so if it's a family boat and the crew will want to be involved a bit more in sailing the boat, they can decide to step the mast back, fix the sprit and raise the jib.
    Last edited by woodeneye; 3rd February 2010 at 06:45 PM. Reason: realised my error and changed the words from "step the mast forward" to "to step the mast back". Sorry for any confusion!

  6. #20
    Join Date
    May 2008
    Location
    UK
    Posts
    848

    Default

    The jib can be fun for the crew or youngsters crewing. Our local lug rigged Scows race singlehanded without jib and two up with jib. Surprisingly even racing most of the time except for certain conditions which favour one or the other.

    You can even use a spinnaker if the two of you weigh enough!



    However they do use a stayed rig, which seems very unusual in the world of lug rigs but is completely normal around here. When using a jib the boom is restrained at the mast by a small loop of rope so that the jig does not catch on the front of the boom when tacking.

    Only one mast position is used which is not really correct, but tipping the mast forward as far as possible keeps things pretty balanced.

    Cannot imagine a bowsprit though, just something to get broken and it would lower the aspect of the jib anyway?

    Sure MIK is taking no notice of our ramblings and keeping his ideas clear!

    Brian

  7. #21
    Join Date
    May 2008
    Location
    UK
    Posts
    848

    Default

    Yes, Joost it does really.

    Iain Oughtred's 12' Shearwater has a lug only option and a gunter with jib option. The mast foot position is about 4" different for the two rigs, similar to a Mirror dinghy.

    Scows never had jibs, but were stayed because their spars were short so that they all stowed inside the hull. They were used as sailing tenders to get out to the large yachts which could not get up Lymington River, so crews sailed out to the mouth of the River moorings and dropped the rig into the boat when left at the mooring.

    When John developed the modern version he need a jib because the first order for 10 boats was from the Royal for children's training boats. One experienced club member helming and two kids up the front. The youth program has been running 25 years now, and on Wednesday afternoons the River is covered in Scows - it's a great sight seeing all those youngsters out sailing.

    The first generations are now our current Olympic medal winners.

    Seem to cope with one position somehow?

    Brian

  8. #22
    Join Date
    Apr 2008
    Location
    Tilburg, the Netherlands
    Age
    51
    Posts
    519

    Default

    Sorry Brian,

    I just deleted my post before yours as the last remark of my post related to Bruce's post regarding the postion of the mast. Bruce has meanhwhile fixed the error in his reasoning by correcting in his message the "step the mast forward" part to "step the mast back". Hence my comment seemed to be out of place as it challenged exactly this error. My apologies if it has confused anyone.

    I should however not have deleted my remark that a lot of designers (most notably Iain Oughtred) design their boats with mulitple rigging options.

    I think the Lymington scows get away with the second mast position as when the boom is moved aft (together with the centre of effort of the main) this move in centre of effort is compensated by the jib. Tilting of the mast would further finetune the balance I guess.

    Best regards, Joost

  9. #23
    Join Date
    Jul 2005
    Location
    'Delaide, Australia
    Age
    65
    Posts
    8,138

    Default

    Howdy

    I must admit that I don't like sloop rigs much any more - the way that jib flops around a third of the time unless you have a whisker pole just looks wrong compared to a yawl where everything works without any blanketing at all (if you know the trick of sailing downwind)

    Also all the complication you need to add to a jib to make sure it works really well on all points of sail - barber haulers and at least one track or a substitute method. Fundamentally it is not a very efficient sail and is made efficient by such adjustments.

    Once there is a commitment to a certain level of cost jibs are quite powerful and nice on most points of sail, but I prefer not to make that commitment.

    The staying, or rather, the feeding of staying loads into a hull without side decks can add a lot of complication beyond the simple measures for an unstayed mast.

    Best wishes
    Michael

  10. #24
    Join Date
    Jul 2005
    Location
    'Delaide, Australia
    Age
    65
    Posts
    8,138

    Default

    Just noticed in the video in the sailing performance thread that the Flights are using a jib boom.

  11. #25
    Join Date
    Apr 2008
    Location
    Tilburg, the Netherlands
    Age
    51
    Posts
    519

    Default

    Hello,

    I just noticed that this post got down to the second page. I cannot let that happen of course (just putting a tiny bit of pressure on MIK here ).

    Best wishes, Joost

  12. #26
    Join Date
    Jul 2005
    Location
    'Delaide, Australia
    Age
    65
    Posts
    8,138

    Default

    Well it worked Joost.

    Nothing happening just yet - have been straightening out the PDR situation and have to get the MK3 PDR plans and cutting files sorted for a guy who wants to manufacture in Texas for distribution through the USA.

    It is pretty exciting - so that is where my energy will be for the next few weeks - writing up the plans and helping him get things sorted out for production. He will also be doing the Quick Canoe kit. So it is a nice fit. He wants to focus on the low cost end. Will be interesting to see if he can get enough volume to cover the lower markups of these budget boats. Clint is getting computer cutting of the more elaborate Eureka and GIS organised.

    So you can see where my head is at!

    MIK

  13. #27
    Join Date
    Dec 2009
    Location
    Texas
    Posts
    319

    Default

    Found out today that the State of Texas, Parks and Wildlife Department require any sailboat larger than 14ft with or without a motor has to be registered with the state. That means an added expense for my Goat and hull numbers on the hull.

    If son of a Goat is 14ft or under it would not need to be registered. That would be one small way son of a Goat could save some money for it's owners.

    How is a boat this size registered/titled in other parts of the world?

  14. #28
    Join Date
    Jan 2009
    Location
    São Paulo, Brazil
    Posts
    47

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by john goodman View Post
    Found out today that the State of Texas, Parks and Wildlife Department require any sailboat larger than 14ft with or without a motor has to be registered with the state. That means an added expense for my Goat and hull numbers on the hull.

    If son of a Goat is 14ft or under it would not need to be registered. That would be one small way son of a Goat could save some money for it's owners.

    How is a boat this size registered/titled in other parts of the world?
    In Brazil, no registration if under 5m and no motor - one of the reasons for my choosing the 4.7m GIS. Registration is a pain here for a non-production boat. I can also sail her without a licence, though I am going to study for one as I want to really get my head around the Portuguese nautical vocabulary - a bit of a nightmare when even the specialised English vocab can be a bit challenging.

    Steve

  15. #29
    Join Date
    Jun 2009
    Location
    New Hampshire
    Posts
    960

    Default

    You need a license to sail a boat? Weird.



    In NH I actually have to register the boat (12'+), but due to its size (under 20') I don't need to put the numbers on it, the sticker is enough. It won't be much to register it. It's all kind of silly.

  16. #30
    Join Date
    Jul 2005
    Location
    'Delaide, Australia
    Age
    65
    Posts
    8,138

    Default

    True about the 12ft - in many places it does drop under the radar. The PDR at 8ft does fall under the minimum size in many other places.

    Best wishes
    MIK

Page 2 of 11 FirstFirst 1234567 ... LastLast

Similar Threads

  1. Goat Island Skiff Project Costing Template
    By woodeneye in forum Michael Storer Wooden Boat Plans
    Replies: 0
    Last Post: 11th June 2009, 07:15 PM
  2. The Goat Lug...another use
    By CCBB in forum Michael Storer Wooden Boat Plans
    Replies: 5
    Last Post: 14th August 2008, 07:52 PM
  3. First impressions of a Goat
    By CCBB in forum Michael Storer Wooden Boat Plans
    Replies: 29
    Last Post: 6th August 2008, 08:55 AM
  4. New baby goat
    By ciscokid in forum PETS, PETS & more PETS.
    Replies: 3
    Last Post: 5th July 2008, 06:48 PM
  5. What gets up my goat!
    By Waldo in forum HAVE YOUR SAY
    Replies: 27
    Last Post: 12th August 2005, 12:43 AM

Tags for this Thread

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •