Thanks Thanks:  0
Needs Pictures Needs Pictures:  0
Picture(s) thanks Picture(s) thanks:  0
Page 21 of 23 FirstFirst ... 111617181920212223 LastLast
Results 301 to 315 of 336
  1. #301
    Join Date
    May 2003
    Location
    Perth WA
    Posts
    3,784

    Default

    Brad,
    Don't get hung up on resolution. Your steppers can only hold half steps anyway so the extra resolution is wasted - well not really as it helps round off numbers more accurately. Don't forget this will impact on the computer CPU sending down so many pulses just for one axis.

    The other issue is speed. Work out your max speed of the stepper and I think you will find the 4th axis will be painfully slow with the extra reduction. You are not making space ships so I would run with a direct couple first up and you still have good resolution at 100/1. I think you will find that slow for the type of work you do and you may actually step that up in the future.
    Cheers,
    Rod

  2. # ADS
    Google Adsense Advertisement
    Join Date
    Always
    Location
    Advertising world
    Posts
    Many





     
  3. #302
    Join Date
    May 2008
    Location
    Geelong
    Posts
    264

    Default

    So telling Mach3 555.555555556 steps per degree wont be a problem?

    If so, I could just rig up this sort of thing.



    From a build on the MechMate board. I just noticed he's only using a 20:1 gear box.

    Brad.

  4. #303
    Join Date
    May 2008
    Location
    Geelong
    Posts
    264

    Default

    Im not sure what you mean by the steppers only hold 1/2 steps? It'll only accept 555.5 steps? So if it needs to do a 360 turn... 555.5 * 360 = 199980 steps but this is short of the 200000 needed for 360 degress with the 100:1 gear?

    Brad.

  5. #304
    Join Date
    May 2003
    Location
    Perth WA
    Posts
    3,784

    Default

    Hi Brad,
    It is an electrical/mechanical limitation of a stepper - it can only hold the midway point between two coils. Don't confuse this with software setting.

    Go into "Settings" screen in mach3 and do a "Calibrate Axis" for A axis and just pick any random numbers for this. This will return (hopefully) lots of decimal places and from now on you will be able to set to those deciaml places in Motor Tuning. Just a quirck of Mach3.
    Cheers,
    Rod

  6. #305
    Join Date
    Nov 2006
    Location
    Darwin HowardSprings
    Age
    52
    Posts
    1,197

    Default

    ill have a go at explaining it ,

    when you energize coil "A' it jumps to "A" position and holds it self there at full torque

    when you energize coil "B" it jumps to "B" position and holds its self there , at full torque

    1/2 stepping is when both "A" and "B" are energized and the motor jumps to 1/2 way between "A and B " since both magnets want to go there separate ways , the holding torque is only 1/2 of the full holding torque

    micro stepping , is turning a square wave ( rough running at low speed ) into a multi square stepped sine wave , so is going a,A,a,ab,AB,ab,b,B,b , if you stop at any of the micro steps , the hold position is still at a Full "A" , "B" or at half step "AB" ,

    hope that helped , ken

  7. #306
    Join Date
    May 2008
    Location
    Geelong
    Posts
    264

    Default

    Thanks Ken. Makes perfect sense. So I'll go the direct hook up. Here's what Im thinking.



    I did like the design above but it only seems to have one set of bearings supporting the shaft if the tail stock isnt in play. The second set of bearings on mine should keep the shaft level and ensure the only forces on the harmonic drive bearings will be rotational.

    Brad.

  8. #307
    Join Date
    May 2003
    Location
    Perth WA
    Posts
    3,784

    Default

    The correct approach is to have a tapered roller bearing like on the front axle of a car.
    A chuck has radial as well as end forces and the tapered roller bearing is the cheapest option for that.
    Pillow blocks are great for self allignment but not much chop for end loads.
    Cheers,
    Rod

  9. #308
    Join Date
    May 2008
    Location
    Geelong
    Posts
    264

    Default

    It seems to work.



    Brad.

  10. #309
    Join Date
    May 2008
    Location
    Geelong
    Posts
    264

    Default

    Test run was OK... lost a few steps as I had it set in Mach too fast. The video shows it running at 30% speed, but I think it still tried to go too fast every once and while. I'm just doing an air cut as write this and it seems to be going ok.



    Didnt bother with the finish cut after it lost steps.



    Brad.

  11. #310
    Join Date
    May 2008
    Location
    Geelong
    Posts
    264

    Default

    I have a Xylotex contoller that Im hoping to use for control of the 4th axis. At the moment I have to use one of the contollers of the X-axis from the G540. Only I'll need to install a second parallel ports. Has anyone tried the motion control over two LTP ports? Can Mach do it?

    Brad.

  12. #311
    Join Date
    May 2003
    Location
    Perth WA
    Posts
    3,784

    Default

    Hi Brad,
    Love the work - the materials looks like timber but going by the colour it is machinable wax. It must have strands embedded in it to produce the fluffy stuff.

    Mach3 allows two parallel ports and they will operate seamlessly. I have had two working on a machine (Motherboard and a PCI parallel port). The PCI address was tricky to find but I am sure you will work it out and it might be different with various brands of cards.

    Alternatively you can go smoothstepper that already has two parallel ports on them.
    Cheers,
    Rod

  13. #312
    Join Date
    May 2008
    Location
    Geelong
    Posts
    264

    Default

    Hi Rod,

    It's actually foam, I'll get another LPT card tomorrow and try it with the Xylotex controller. Just need to figure out how to disengage two of the axis as I've heard the controllers will blow without a motor contected.

    Brad.

  14. #313
    Join Date
    Feb 2008
    Location
    Australia
    Posts
    988

    Default

    This option I would consider a big hassle but here goes, there are 2 outputs that are unused in the G540 setup (Unless you have external devices attached to them) and you can power a fifth axis from those outputs,

    The output pins on the G540 are limited to ~10Khz so it may be an issue, but I had a customer splice the BD25 cable and redirect the outputs to a G201X driver which from what he told me worked great.

  15. #314
    Join Date
    May 2003
    Location
    Perth WA
    Posts
    3,784

    Default

    Hi Brad,
    If you are talking about disabling the Xylotex drives then they do have an enable jumper for each drive. i would also adjust the pots for the disabled axes to 0 volts as a safety measure.
    Cheers,
    Rod

  16. #315
    Join Date
    May 2008
    Location
    Geelong
    Posts
    264

    Default

    Hey Chris

    Yeah I''ve been chatting to Greg about this as an option, but I'd lose my spindle on/off and second relay control so I'll give the second LPT a go. Thanks for the input though.

    Brad.

Similar Threads

  1. Gecko G540 CNC Kits now available
    By phomann in forum CNC Machines
    Replies: 46
    Last Post: 17th January 2010, 06:25 PM
  2. G540 Matched Motors
    By seafurymike in forum CNC Machines
    Replies: 4
    Last Post: 25th September 2009, 02:47 PM
  3. Trailer - to build or not to build
    By motegi in forum TRAILERS & OTHER FABRICATED STUFF
    Replies: 17
    Last Post: 6th May 2009, 03:07 PM
  4. Mach 3 & G540 Motor tuning
    By seafurymike in forum CNC Machines
    Replies: 13
    Last Post: 20th April 2009, 04:24 PM
  5. Gecko G540 - special offer
    By snowyskiesau in forum CNC Machines
    Replies: 13
    Last Post: 13th February 2009, 01:50 PM

Tags for this Thread

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •