Thanks Thanks:  0
Likes Likes:  0
Needs Pictures Needs Pictures:  0
Picture(s) thanks Picture(s) thanks:  0
Results 1 to 9 of 9
  1. #1
    Join Date
    Dec 2011
    Location
    Brisbane
    Posts
    454

    Default Internal vs External Cut Dimensions

    Is probably a simple fix but I am somehow gaining a few extra mm on external cuts.

    I have measured all the internal measurements against my drawings and they are pretty much spot on, but when I do an external cuts for some reason I seem to gain about 4mm of additional width / height.

    I can only put this down to the CAD program (Mastercam X6) not properly compensating for the width of the 6mm cutter when going from internal to external cuts. Anyone experienced this before? I am thinking it is an easy fix.

    The other thing I noticed (and I broke a couple of bits because of it) I am expecting the point of origin to be on the outside cut line but for some reason it seems to be inside the job. See picture for point of origin.
    Attached Images Attached Images

  2. # ADS
    Google Adsense Advertisement
    Join Date
    Always
    Location
    Advertising world
    Posts
    Many





     
  3. #2
    Join Date
    Dec 2011
    Location
    Perth
    Age
    45
    Posts
    106

    Default

    I don't know Mastercam or any industrial cam software, my only experience is with our very GUI based setup on an Oce/Zund cutter.

    Having said that it sounds as if there might be two different settings for tool diam/radius when offsetting the toolpath for internal or external cuts. If it was a single setting then your cuts would be off for both.

    If your parts are coming out 4mm oversize then your toolpath is being offset 5mm instead of 3mm, so it thinks your running a 10mm diam bit instead of 6mm.
    Michael

  4. #3
    Join Date
    Dec 2011
    Location
    Brisbane
    Posts
    454

    Default

    Under the "Cut Parameters" there is a "Compensation Direction" which has options of "Left" and "Right". So far I have been leaving it on Left, but I am guessing I need to change this to Right for outside cuts. I tried to experiment with it today but didn't get as far as doing the outside cut, so should be able to confirm my suspicions tomorrow.

    The 2mm difference could be down to fine tuning of the axis. My circles were slightly under but my lengths were slightly over, so I have left it as is for now. If tomorrow I find the length is under, I will adjust the axis settings again.

  5. #4
    Join Date
    Oct 2007
    Location
    Alexandra Vic
    Age
    69
    Posts
    2,810

    Default

    My experience is with a multi tool machine. I have forgotten which software product we used to prepare the code, but I know that it had profiles for each tool and operation that it was used for. For example, different profiles for say a 3/8" compression bit for single pass full depth internal cut, single pass full depth external cut, multi pass full depth internal cut (1st pass cuts to 0.5mm above table and 0.1mm inside finished dimension, 2nd pass full depth and to finished dimension), multi pass full depth external cut (similar to multi pass internal except that the first pass was 0.1mm outside the finished dimension).

    Can be cumbersome to set up all the different profiles for multiple tools initially, but very easy to modify all of the profiles in one shot if you change the physical bit diameter to a different size, or just have a bit resharpened with a minute change in diameter.

    Joy is that once you have the profiles fine tuned, your only real issue is deciding what profile to assign to each tool path or operation, then let the software do it's bit. Concept works well, and produces consistent results over years of commercial operation. Sorry, I have no background with the software that you are using.
    I used to be an engineer, I'm not an engineer any more, but on the really good days I can remember when I was.

  6. #5
    Join Date
    Dec 2011
    Location
    Brisbane
    Posts
    454

    Default

    I used the "right" setting and on a 310mm width I got a measurement of 312mm. What I think I need to do is do a test with no offset so it follows the drawn line with the middle of the cutter. That way I just subtract 6mm from the size of the square / rectangle. I may still need to do some axis adjustments.

  7. #6
    Join Date
    Oct 2007
    Location
    Alexandra Vic
    Age
    69
    Posts
    2,810

    Default

    It might pay you to try and draw a square and a circle close to the size of your table with a pencil instead of a bit in the (stationary) spindle collet. You should then be able to compare the dimensions on them with those on the initial artwork so that you can calibrate the steps per inch/cm etc . Once you can get the scaling spot on, you can then concentrate on sorting out offsets for internal and external cuts etc. The machine I mentioned earlier had a pencil tool as one of the tools mounted, initially used to verify scaling and squareness, and subsequently used to write part labels on components. (We were using preprinted labels by the time I took over as operator).
    I used to be an engineer, I'm not an engineer any more, but on the really good days I can remember when I was.

  8. #7
    Join Date
    Dec 2011
    Location
    Brisbane
    Posts
    454

    Default

    Good idea, the pencil line will be thinner for more accurate measurements. I don't have changeable tools so don't have to worry about tool offsets at the moment. I would like an auto changer down the track but they are expensive and really not justifiable at the moment.

    Working on building Mk2 of the Z axis at the moment, now I have the rack and pinion Z axis operational, I can use it to build my ball screw Z axis for greater precision.

  9. #8
    Join Date
    Dec 2011
    Location
    Brisbane
    Posts
    454

    Default

    Ok I think the compensation sussed...

    I put the pencil in and drew 6 x 100mm squares, two with comp off , two with comp left, and two with comp right. I told the software I had a 20mm bit in for easier measurements.

    As expected the comp left and right drew lines (as best as I can measure with verniers) 10mm either side of my comp off line. But where it got tricky was depending on the direction of cut, depended if Left and Right was inside or outside.

    Drawing clockwise Left was to the outside and Right to the inside, but drawing anti clockwise Left was on the inside and Right was on the outside.

    Having sussed this out and knowing my last outside job cut in 12mm alloy was Right and anti clockwise, my measurements should have been to size, but it was 312mm wide instead of 310mm. Not ready yet to blame the calibration, as the job might have moved.

    I have some Styrofoam, I might do some test cuts on it tomorrow.

  10. #9
    Join Date
    Aug 2008
    Location
    Melbourne
    Age
    34
    Posts
    6,127

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by HeadScratcher View Post
    But where it got tricky was depending on the direction of cut, depended if Left and Right was inside or outside.

    Drawing clockwise Left was to the outside and Right to the inside, but drawing anti clockwise Left was on the inside and Right was on the outside.
    Yep, the compensation is related to the direction you've gone to draw your shape.

Similar Threads

  1. Replies: 4
    Last Post: 22nd December 2008, 02:41 PM
  2. Curve Jig -Internal and External
    By damienhazo in forum ROUTER JIGS
    Replies: 20
    Last Post: 27th September 2006, 04:53 PM

Tags for this Thread

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •