Needs Pictures: 0
Picture(s) thanks: 0
Results 16 to 24 of 24
-
20th August 2016, 10:45 PM #16
-
20th August 2016 10:45 PM # ADSGoogle Adsense Advertisement
- Join Date
- Always
- Location
- Advertising world
- Age
- 2010
- Posts
- Many
-
20th August 2016, 10:56 PM #17
Gents you are preaching to the converted.
About 10 years ago I gave away all my imperial measuring implements and went totally metric (I even converted my 20-20 vision to 10-10). I purchased a Leigh dovetailer (in metric) and bought the metric conversion kits for my Incra positioner(s). Then eventually when my interest in woodworking surpassed the Australian market's availabilities, I made inroads into the more wider market of USA, with their retrograded imperial measurements. But alas a fully metric tape measure does not have 1/16 markings and I had to do a lot of re-learning, improvising and buying replacement measurers as the recipients of my past imperial gifts refused to part with them.
I still think and measure in metric but find that more often than I desire, I need to get into an imperial mood. To top it all off, those Yanks can't make up their minds, as not only do the stick with imperial they then mix that up with decimal.
Anyway the thing I like about the subject calculator (and as I have recently learnt many phone apps) is that they can display imperial metric measurements as fractions which are the markings used on imperial rulers (not metric).
That's my $29 worth, which is what I paid for my calculator.
PS. Also a lot of quality Yank measurers come either in imperial or metric and not both. I have often been "forced" to buy the two sets for completeness, but that's got nothing to do with this topic other than explain why I often cry poor.
PPS. I've been rather slack with my builds so I had to find something else to write about...
-
20th August 2016, 11:09 PM #18
-
20th August 2016, 11:12 PM #19Woodworking mechanic
- Join Date
- Jan 2014
- Location
- Sydney Upper North Shore
- Posts
- 4,470
I recently built a jig from a plan designed by a German woodworker that was in an American Magazine - instead of 200mm the plan had 7 7/8" etc. etc.
Even though I was brought up on imperial I would have preferred setting out 200mm rather than 7 7/8"
-
21st August 2016, 12:58 AM #20
thank the almighty for that
I am yet to see a useful metric / imperial rule and I don't believe that one is possible because 12 inches is 304.8 mm and no matter how you mark teh graduations, one end of the rule will be "wrong" when used for the other system.
I got round the problem by buying metric rules for my Starret combo squares.regards from Alberta, Canada
ian
-
21st August 2016, 07:44 AM #21Skwair2rownd
- Join Date
- Nov 2007
- Location
- Dundowran Beach
- Age
- 76
- Posts
- 19,922
-
21st August 2016, 08:40 AM #22Skwair2rownd
- Join Date
- Nov 2007
- Location
- Dundowran Beach
- Age
- 76
- Posts
- 19,922
[QUOTE=robbygard;1971129
on a separate but related note: when i was in primary school, we used to do all our times tables to twelve, because money and measurements relied on twelve .... do kids still do twelve times or do they now stop at ten?
regards david[/QUOTE]
I was talking about this with my brother the other day. Because there is no need to use the 12x anymore then it is generally not taught.
The imperial system sure makes for mental dexterity. Remember the multiplication and division of money.? Two changes of base to get
things done. I remember many sessions of frustration by many fellow students and many sessions of tears for others. One poor bugger
was so frustrated that he hurled a bottle of ink across the room!
Other elements of the imperial system also required chang of base: 12 inches =1 foot, 3fet- 1 yard, and so on.
One thing that struck me on moving to Qld was the use of percches that persisted until quite recently. It always struck me as an oddity.
-
21st August 2016, 10:38 AM #23Mug punter
- Join Date
- May 2009
- Location
- Sapphire Coast NSW
- Age
- 69
- Posts
- 434
thanks for that .. it (the continuing or absence of 12x tables) only occurred to me as a result of this discussion
the land i sold in 1989 was still defined as 27 acres 2 roods ... my current land is in hectares
i never had any trouble doing the imperial measurements and currency at school (or now for that matter) ...
back to the plans though ... as i said i am a bit hybrid about it ... i thickness my timber to mm because that it how the thicknesser is setup ... for cutting out other timber i generally use imperial measures ... because, as crowie said, the plans are written that way ... if they were metric i would turn the rule over and use that scale instead
when thicknessing i don't always look for an exact conversion .... for example 3/8 is 9.525mm sometimes it can be 9.5 and sometimes 10 as far as i am concerned ... depends where it has to fit in and whether a little more can add a robustness
regards david
-
21st August 2016, 09:54 PM #24
Similar Threads
-
LPG Conversions
By John Saxton in forum NOTHING AT ALL TO DO WITH WOODWORKReplies: 36Last Post: 21st August 2006, 08:22 AM -
Various metric conversions
By zenwood in forum WOODIES JOKESReplies: 0Last Post: 12th March 2006, 12:46 AM -
Conversion of plans from imperial to metric
By OtakiriLad in forum WOODWORK - GENERALReplies: 23Last Post: 22nd October 2004, 04:11 AM -
Calculations and conversions
By DaveInOz in forum WOODWORK - GENERALReplies: 0Last Post: 10th September 2004, 04:02 PM