Likes: 0
Needs Pictures: 0
Picture(s) thanks: 0
Results 1 to 8 of 8
-
25th September 2020, 01:09 PM #1Senior Member
- Join Date
- Apr 2008
- Location
- Southern Riverina
- Posts
- 139
Parabolic curve for pivoting router fence
Not sure if this kind of thing has been discussed here much, I couldn't find anything in a quick search although I may be using the wrong terms.
To try and summarize, the idea is for the fence to follow a particular curve so that a workpiece clamped to it moves across the bit in a straight line rather than an arc. The same fence can then be used for cutting dados, dovetails etc with no need for any additional tracks or slots in your table.
Here is an old youtube video that shows the concept and the advantages, but gives nothing away as to how it is achieved - unless you follow some of the comments which point to a special curved slot at the pivot end of the fence. Some folks on other forums have tried to figure out the maths and exploded their heads in the process.
My thinking is that it shouldn't be that hard to achieve the same result by simply routing a curved track in the table for the adjustable end of the fence to follow. Rather than trying to grapple with the maths behind it, it would seem much easier to just reverse the process and use the geometry of the problem to create the solution.
In the diagram below, the red line is the fence, and the yellow line is a temporary track attached to the fence (essentially it represents a future workpiece).
Point A is a pin fixed in the table, that slides in a track in the fence.
Point B is the router position, but during construction it is another pin in the table that slides inside the temporary track.
Point C is a zero stop, located so that the face of the fence is precisely over the centre axis of the cutting bit.
Point F is the adjustment point of the fence, but during construction it will be the router.
Properly set up, all the usual benefits of a pivoting fence should apply - ie, the distance between F and C should always be exactly double that between the fence and the centre of the router bit, allowing the use of spacers (or a workpiece itself) for precise alignment and centring. In addition, any workpiece clamped to the fence should follow the path of the yellow line, and receive a straight cut at 90 degrees to the fence as the fence follows the curve.
I'm still trying to grapple a bit with the exact mechanism at point A, and whether the pivot point really needs to be at the face of the fence or whether it can be back under the body of the fence (and if so how to correct for that in the rest of the jig), but otherwise it should be pretty straightforward, right?!
fence-arc.jpg
-
25th September 2020 01:09 PM # ADSGoogle Adsense Advertisement
- Join Date
- Always
- Location
- Advertising world
- Posts
- Many
-
25th September 2020, 03:37 PM #2
Dusty
what I saw in that youTube video is that at around the 2:00 mark, the demonstrator rotates the work piece through 180 degrees BEFORE completing the router cut. I stopped watching a few seconds after that point. If the demonstrator is rotating the work piece to demonstrate the fence's ability to "automatically" center the cut the demonstrator is using poorly concealed slight of hand.regards from Alberta, Canada
ian
-
25th September 2020, 04:35 PM #3GOLD MEMBER
- Join Date
- Apr 2014
- Location
- Little River
- Age
- 78
- Posts
- 1,205
It would work equally as well if the moving clamp is on a straight T channel with the clamp "F" able to move along the fence.
To work really accurately the pivot point at "A" would have to be centred on the face of the fence but since in most cases the size of the timber being routed is small compared to the distance "A to C" you may find that the error introduced by having the "A" under the body of the fence is so minute that it won't be of any concequence.
The distance "C to F" will in fact be close enough to twice the distance from the centre of the cutter at "B" with a straight clamping channel. Provided that the edge of the pin at point "C" is lined up the centre of the cutter.
I think that the curved clamping path is a complication that in fact gives no real benefit over a straight one.
-
25th September 2020, 06:40 PM #4GOLD MEMBER
- Join Date
- Nov 2018
- Location
- Newcastle
- Posts
- 1,016
Ian, I think he was routing two opposite ends of the groove to show that they met perfectly in the middle - ie that they were perfectly centred. If they weren't, you'd notice the step where the two grooves met in the middle. You're suggesting he routed the same groove twice to make it look like a centred single cut. Maybe watch again and see what you think? I reckon he's only going halfway in from each end with each cut.
-
25th September 2020, 06:45 PM #5Woodworking mechanic
- Join Date
- Jan 2014
- Location
- Sydney Upper North Shore
- Posts
- 4,470
Ian,
By swapping the timber over at the 2 min. mark, wasn’t he just proving that when routing from both ends to the centre, the groove sides lined up in the middle proving it was central?
i noticed he didn’t rout the full distance, from one end to the other, when he turned it over which if done, may have covered up that it wasn’t cutting in the centre.
If he had just routed the full length, without rotating, how would we know it was in the middle?Last edited by Lappa; 25th September 2020 at 07:24 PM. Reason: removed repeated statement
-
25th September 2020, 08:51 PM #6GOLD MEMBER
- Join Date
- Nov 2018
- Location
- Newcastle
- Posts
- 1,016
Here's the patent, along with pics. Should make it easier to reconstruct: US5988242A - Pivoted fence with locating post
- Google Patents
-
26th September 2020, 01:53 AM #7
-
26th September 2020, 02:07 AM #8Senior Member
- Join Date
- Apr 2008
- Location
- Southern Riverina
- Posts
- 139
I don't think so, as there would then be nothing stopping the fence sliding freely along the line between points A and F. The curve is the secret sauce that deliberately moves the fence to cancel out the arc that would normally occur when 'swinging' a clamped workpiece over the cutter, allowing you to make a straight crosscut in a piece clamped to the fence.
I am inclined to agree that the inaccuracy from pivot A being under the fence rather than on the face of it would probably be small, and it shouldn't affect the crosscut path as the construction method would guarantee a straight path over the cutter regardless of the location of the pivot. Having said that, having a track on the face of a fence is no bad thing and it shouldn't be too hard to engineer a way to have it pivot around the face.
Similar Threads
-
SOLD: Drill Press Fence (could be a Router Table Fence)
By derekcohen in forum WOODWORK - Tools & MachineryReplies: 5Last Post: 5th August 2020, 01:58 AM -
WEST AUST Incra LS fence/wonder fence, table saw, 2HP dusty, Triton TRA001 router, etc.
By Sore_Dust in forum WOODWORK - Tools & MachineryReplies: 20Last Post: 23rd August 2018, 06:36 AM -
Pivoting Lid on a Box
By Pauls321 in forum BOX MAKINGReplies: 8Last Post: 6th May 2018, 05:53 AM -
Pivoting Tool Holder
By WOODbTURNER in forum WOODTURNING - GENERALReplies: 9Last Post: 15th May 2007, 07:29 PM -
Compound Curve Cope and Stick Router Techniques
By NewLou in forum ROUTING FORUMReplies: 0Last Post: 1st July 2005, 11:36 AM