Results 1 to 11 of 11
  1. #1
    Join Date
    May 2019
    Location
    Canberra, Australia
    Posts
    306

    Default Planing bit (sanity check)

    I'm going to set up a planing jig for a Makita 3600BR (1500W). I want to use a 50mm*15mm bit with a 1/2" shank (as big as possible to facilitate the job). Can you see any issues with this - should I get a smaller bit to be cautious?

    BTW I will be milling some very hard wood. Not sure what it is, but it has a density of 1200kg/m^3

  2. # ADS
    Google Adsense Advertisement
    Join Date
    Always
    Location
    Advertising world
    Posts
    Many





     
  3. #2
    Join Date
    Aug 2010
    Location
    Soldiers Point, NSW
    Age
    60
    Posts
    185

    Default

    Hi Yoboseyo

    I tried that very same setup (same router, same bit) but didn't get a very good result. Went back to a 25mm bit and result was very much better. I think the 50mm bit spins too fast in the 3600BR and really needs a variable speed router at a slower speed to get a reasonable result. I was flattening a workbench top of hardwood approx. 2100mm x 900mm and found the 50mm bit burnt the krapper out of the timber and left the centre higher than the edges. The 25mm bit only left the occasional burn mark (operator error?) and flattened the top much better with no centre hump.

    Hope this helps.

    Regards
    Twosheds

  4. #3
    Join Date
    Aug 2008
    Location
    Melbourne
    Age
    34
    Posts
    6,127

    Default

    If you can't slow it down, 50mm is probably too big unless you can feed really fast. Also, don't be tempted by the 6-flute bits, you can't feed fast enough by hand to make them work, 2 flutes is plenty.

  5. #4
    Join Date
    Aug 2011
    Location
    bilpin
    Posts
    3,559

    Default

    I flatten slabs with a 50mm x 12mm two flute bit. The router is a Makita 3612C. The C is the difference - variable speed 9000 - 23000 rpm.
    The BR is a constant speed router, running at 23000rpm, this is way too fast for a 50mm cutter. Even a 25mm cutter would be having trouble in hard timber. For soft timbers I find I can work at a steady pass if the router speed is set to about 15000 rpm. For dense hardwoods I drop back to the 9000rpm. At this speed a 50mm cutter can be worked comfortably, without having to rush to prevent burning.

  6. #5
    Join Date
    Nov 2010
    Location
    Perth W.A
    Posts
    720

    Default

    I have done a fair bit of surfacing work with my router, bought a $75 Torquata bit with 5 tct cutters and pretty much wrecked it first time out.
    Ended up buying a Carbi-tool 3 flute bit which takes replacement 4 face tct inserts, It's an amazing cutter although costs $ 200.
    I run this at about 12000 rpm you can get amazing surface finish if used carefully,

  7. #6
    Join Date
    May 2019
    Location
    Canberra, Australia
    Posts
    306

    Default

    Thanks for the responses, all. I ordered a 1" bit and I'll take shallow cuts

  8. #7
    Join Date
    May 2019
    Location
    Canberra, Australia
    Posts
    306

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by twosheds View Post
    the 50mm bit burnt the krapper out of the timber and left the centre higher than the edges.
    How does this happen?

  9. #8
    Join Date
    Aug 2010
    Location
    Soldiers Point, NSW
    Age
    60
    Posts
    185

    Default

    I think the centre of the workbench surface was higher because the 50mm planing bit was riding on top of the timber to some extent rather than cutting to its full depth, hence the severe burn marks as well. The edge portion was at the right height so to speak because the flutes of the bit cut into the edge at the correct height initially but gradually rode higher on top of the timber as I pushed it toward the centre of the benchtop. Well anyway that is what I think caused it.

    All I did was change to a 25mm 2 flute bit while leaving the jig setup exactly as it was - hey presto.. flat surface with minimal burning.

    Anybody want to buy a little used 50mm 6 flute HSS surface planning bit???

    Regards
    Twosheds

  10. #9
    Join Date
    Aug 2008
    Location
    Melbourne
    Age
    34
    Posts
    6,127

    Default

    Before we start, please note that I am not having a go at you, this is a perfect opportunity to demonstrate how important bit selection is and some of the things to consider. This is the science side to machining that's often overlooked because people simply don't know about it.

    Quote Originally Posted by twosheds View Post
    6 flute HSS
    There's your problem (actually, two problems).

    1) The average cutter surface speed (how fast the tips of the cutter are moving) on a jointer or thicknesser with HSS knives is around 1500 m/min (give or take a few hundred), the surface speed of your bit was up at 3600 m/min - that's 140% over the normal speed. If it was carbide, you could get away with running that fast, but HSS can't handle it.

    2) The average thicknesser takes about 0.3-0.4mm per blade at the slowest feed of 6-7 m/min. Assuming you feed your router that fast by hand (it's doable), you'd be taking 0.053mm per cut; at that point, you're scraping more than cutting. Scraping is bad enough for a cutting edge as it is (if you've ever used a chisel as a scraper to clean up a bit of glue squeezeout/staining, you'd know just how fast that sharp edge goes dull), now factor in all the heat being generated. Let's take a speed of 0.2 m/sec (12 m/min) as a ballpark speed for hand scraping. I'm sure you've felt how hot a scraper gets after just a few minutes of use, now imagine how hot it'd be moving 300x as fast. Now you've got a hot, dull edge whizzing around and there's your burnt job.

    It all comes down to heat management; heat is the enemy of sharp edges, the hotter it gets, the shorter its life. When you're cutting and making chips, they're carrying some of the heat away, if you're scraping and making dust, all the heat is soaking into the tool and the job.

    More flutes is NOT always more better. Extra flutes only help if you can feed the tool fast enough (or slow your RPMs) to make sure every one of them is still cutting effectively and keeping the heat at a level appropriate to the tool material.

  11. #10
    Join Date
    Aug 2010
    Location
    Soldiers Point, NSW
    Age
    60
    Posts
    185

    Default

    I agree with you Elan. And that's a good explanation about the heat generated.

    But I found out the hard way. Lesson learned.

    Regards
    Twosheds

  12. #11
    Join Date
    Jul 2014
    Location
    Brisbane
    Posts
    935

    Default

    I've used a 6 flute 50mm Carb i tool surface planer bit (TSS 13 1/2) in a TRA001 with no burning or ruination of the bit. But the TRA001 does have speed control and it was wound down to 14500 rpm.

Similar Threads

  1. Shed lining sanity check
    By Midnight Man in forum THE SHED
    Replies: 32
    Last Post: 15th May 2018, 06:16 PM
  2. Sanity check on selecting a lathe
    By denncarm in forum METALWORK FORUM
    Replies: 5
    Last Post: 2nd November 2011, 10:40 AM
  3. I thought I'd Come Back To The Madhouse For A Dose Of Sanity
    By echnidna in forum NOTHING AT ALL TO DO WITH WOODWORK
    Replies: 6
    Last Post: 28th May 2006, 12:14 PM
  4. I have recovered some sanity. A large square this time.
    By Schtoo in forum HOMEMADE TOOLS AND JIGS ETC.
    Replies: 14
    Last Post: 20th January 2006, 01:00 AM
  5. Sanity
    By Iain in forum WOODIES JOKES
    Replies: 0
    Last Post: 17th November 2000, 09:58 AM

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •