Thanks Thanks:  0
Likes Likes:  0
Needs Pictures Needs Pictures:  0
Picture(s) thanks Picture(s) thanks:  0
Results 1 to 7 of 7
  1. #1
    Join Date
    Oct 2002
    Location
    Brisbane, QLD, Australia
    Age
    46
    Posts
    2,115

    Default Routing Chair Rail Molding

    Just after some advice or tips...

    Have a nice one piece Freud Chair Rail Molding bit - http://freudtools.com/p-186-chair-rail-bits.aspx

    Trying to figure out the best way of supporting the workpiece as I run it past the bit... it needs to be firm against the fence and held down to the table to produce an even rail molding without bumps, dips or deformities . I tried a setup today with featherboards holding the piece against the fence and down to the table but it seemed to get a lot of chattering and ended up with an uneven surface... Wasn't too bad but I am sure I can do better! This was on a farily light router table (because it had the high fence) and I think the chattering was somewhat a result of a less than solid routing surface and router table.

    Planning on trying the cast iron router table next which should result in less vibration and hopefully a better result... (i was taking light cuts with same results) but just wondering if there is a better way than using featherboards, particularly with regards to holding the work against the fence... I'm thinking maybe an outer fence where the work rides between the outer fence and the router fence. Kind of sandwiched in between. First thought was that it sounded a bit dangerous wedging the work between two fences, but this is kinda what the featherboards are doing anyway??

    Planning on running 3m long pieces through to make and install chair rail in mum's house. Its onlu crapiata pine but it will be painted over and only decorative, not functional rail.

    Any advice or tips welcome, otherwise I'll just keep trying with featherboards alone...
    How much wood could the woodchuck chuck if the woodchuck could chuck wood?

  2. # ADS
    Google Adsense Advertisement
    Join Date
    Always
    Location
    Advertising world
    Age
    2010
    Posts
    Many





     
  3. #2
    Join Date
    Feb 2007
    Location
    Adelaide
    Posts
    595

    Default

    I think probably the idea of two fences wouldn't overcome the problem. With a 3 metre length of rail there would be some variation in width of the rail which would mean that your fences would have to have enough clearance to allow you to slide the rail between them. This "slack" would likely not give enough firm control to eliminate the chatter. Heavier feather boards would be my guess at the solution.

  4. #3
    Join Date
    Jul 2005
    Location
    Orange N.S.W.
    Posts
    165

    Default

    Hi Dean
    Have you tried without the featherboards?
    cheers
    gidgee 1

  5. #4
    Join Date
    Oct 2002
    Location
    Brisbane, QLD, Australia
    Age
    46
    Posts
    2,115

    Default

    No havent tried without featherboards yet. Think it might be difficult to keep control of a long 3m piece without them though...
    However, I think the problem may be with the outfeed support, or lack of. I forgot to provide some extra support on the outfeed for the bottom of the cut where a lot of material is removed... This might be causing the chattering giving a poor result. Have to sort something out for that and re-test

    Fencepost: Yes probably right, varying thickness might make that dual fence idea unworkable.
    How much wood could the woodchuck chuck if the woodchuck could chuck wood?

  6. #5
    Join Date
    Nov 2006
    Location
    t
    Posts
    961

    Default

    Freud bits are usually much heavier than equivalent bits from other companies and thus tend to run more smoothly

    Sometimes bit chatter can be caused by the grain direction, try running the timber through from the other end, the chatter you describe can also be caused by the work piece being to light for the size of the cut as well. If it happens even with the lightest of cuts, you may need to attach your work piece to a heavier backing board, but most times really reducing your cut depth helps, taking up to 6 passes to get full depth.
    .

  7. #6
    Join Date
    Oct 2007
    Location
    Alexandra Vic
    Age
    69
    Posts
    2,810

    Default

    Might be a dumb question Dean, but are you taking multiple light cuts to generate the profile, or a single full depth cut? I am thinking that due to the amount of wood being removed, multiple light cuts might be a better option.

    Another suggestion would be to use a straight uniform grained material, rather than crapiata, and to work from substantial cross sections for rigidity, forming the profile on both edges, then ripping to the required thickness. More waste ultimately, but the stock would be more rigid and less likely to 'chatter' while machining.

    Of course a set of temporary in/out feed benches would also be advantageous as well.

  8. #7
    Join Date
    Jan 2008
    Location
    Sealevel NC
    Posts
    150

    Default

    I'm thinking to make the profile first and then rip the stock to thickness.
    This gives you more rigidity and more wood to absorb the vibration.
    It would also permit you to run the stock all the way through and then one more pass but run through as a "climb cut".
    I'm both dyslexic and paranoid. I keep thinking I'm following someone.

Similar Threads

  1. Molding
    By Sokolic in forum WOODWORK - GENERAL
    Replies: 2
    Last Post: 1st May 2008, 06:55 PM
  2. Molding
    By stymie222 in forum WOODWORK - GENERAL
    Replies: 0
    Last Post: 28th September 2006, 09:36 AM
  3. Routing Rail & Stile by hand
    By Revvun in forum ROUTING FORUM
    Replies: 11
    Last Post: 12th September 2006, 10:00 PM

Tags for this Thread

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •