Thanks: 0
Likes: 0
Needs Pictures: 0
Picture(s) thanks: 0
Results 16 to 26 of 26
Thread: Cheapest adequate dust handling
-
31st August 2005, 05:49 PM #16
Occam
Well done for reading Pentz's site - sounds like you realise how serious it is. The bit I remember choking on (excuse the pun) was his statement:
Four hours of hobbyist woodworking can create more fine dust exposure for us, those close to us, and even our pets than over a year of working in a regulated commercial facility.
For my money, I've gone with the Triton system with an old vac from Godfrey's. I'll upgrade it to a cyclone when I get the chance - probably cost less than $20.
What price do you put on your health and that of those around you - that's the question, I reckon.
Bulli.
-
31st August 2005 05:49 PM # ADSGoogle Adsense Advertisement
- Join Date
- Always
- Location
- Advertising world
- Posts
- Many
-
31st August 2005, 08:01 PM #17
I just recently built a cyclone based on Mr. Pentz's design, and all I can say is "Why did I wait so long?"
You can see the beginning of my Cyclone Saga here....
Cyclone Saga Page 1
here is a pic of the clean out box at the bottom of the filter stack...
Yep, after running about 30 to 40 litres of dust through it (dust bin less than half full) I got next to nothing for dust. This is after lightly beating the filter stack, and using compressed air to blow from the outside of the filters to dislodge any dust on them.
Nothing, zip, nadda, zilch....
I'm one happy camper!
Cheers!
-
1st September 2005, 04:56 PM #18
A cyclone looks like the best dust collector, and when I have to move the workshop to a new shed (my wife has strongly hinted that too much woodworking should not be done indoors) I will have the space for it; I am NOT allowed to build a cyclone into the guest room.
But how can power tools that are not designed for efficient dust collection (says Bill Pentz) be managed??
-
1st September 2005, 05:57 PM #19Deceased
- Join Date
- Jun 2003
- Location
- ...
- Posts
- 7,955
Originally Posted by occam
The simplest way of building one is to buy the Triton dust bucket and convert it into a Sturdee mini cyclone as per my post or you can adapt it like others have done just by using plastic buckets.
Peter.
-
1st September 2005, 06:21 PM #20
There are undoubtably several little sturdee cyclone buckets around. I like the mini version of the real BP design. Gives an insight into cyclones and what to expect if you scale up to the big sucker. However Sturdee's is certainly quick, easy and efficient. Either way, a lil cyclone is better than none.
Boring signature time again!
-
1st September 2005, 06:55 PM #21
Stu I saw your website a little while ago and must congratulate you on your workmanship WRT the cyclone.
-
1st September 2005, 07:21 PM #22Originally Posted by boban
........ah......being a Canuck, I.......ah.......I'm not familiar with "WRT"....translation?
Cheers!
-
1st September 2005, 10:32 PM #23Originally Posted by occam
Tools that don't have any dust-ports, eg. most routers, lathes or drills, etc. can also be used with a vac. Simply knock together a scoop to go on the end of the vac line and use something to hold it in an appropriate position. It won't collect everything but, properly positioned, it will collect most of the fine air-borne stuff that your wife complains about drifting through the house.
Either way, designed for efficient dust collection or not, some is far better than none.
BTW, just to clarify something I think you may've missed:
The triton dustbucket has an in-built filter that traps down to a very small size, although not in the 3-5micron range of a true-blue dust collector. I literally haven't needed to empty the shop-vac bag once in the last couple of years! But when you empty the dustbucket you do need to clean the filter.
The advantage of a small inline cyclone is that it doesn't rely on filters at all, only centripetal force. After a week of using my home-built Sturdee cyclone (all the time I had before my shop-vac died for other reasons) I noticed about 1 tablespoon of fine dust in the vac's bag, which meant that my conversion of the dust-bucket wasn't as efficient as leaving in the filter... but IMHO this was more than made up for by the fact I didn't have to clean the damned filter again.
- Andy Mc
-
1st September 2005, 10:55 PM #24Originally Posted by occam
You're WW for fun aren't you, so speed is not the primary objective.
Doing your shaping with hand tools will produce a lot less dust.
However, if you must sand, shape and cut with power tools within the house my suggestion is to mount a LARGE exhaust fan and filter in the window to turn the room you're using into a negative pressure zone. This will keep the dust you're generating within the room and out of the rest of the house. Blowing the dust outside most probably means it just re-enters the house through another door or window.
In my case I've decided the family's health is worth staying away from MDF as much as possible and investing in a Festo dust extractor for the portable tools.
-
1st September 2005, 11:10 PM #25Originally Posted by Stu in Tokyo
see http://www.acronymfinder.comThose are my principles, and if you don't like them . . . well, I have others.
-
1st September 2005, 11:14 PM #26Originally Posted by zenwood
But who say "With Respect to" in normal speech........
Oh the many tribes of English
Cheers!
Similar Threads
-
A Dyson Dual Cyclone Dust Extractor
By Turbulance in forum DUST EXTRACTIONReplies: 5Last Post: 29th September 2010, 02:13 PM -
Dust collection. There is another way
By Oldblock in forum DUST EXTRACTIONReplies: 16Last Post: 1st June 2006, 07:37 PM -
dust extraction for bandsaws
By Ivor in forum BANDSAWSReplies: 20Last Post: 16th February 2005, 06:09 PM -
Triton Dust Collector Bag
By al2 in forum TRITON / GMCReplies: 4Last Post: 16th September 2004, 09:18 AM -
ducting for dust extracting
By jow104 in forum WOODWORK - GENERALReplies: 5Last Post: 21st April 2004, 06:16 PM