Thanks Thanks:  0
Likes Likes:  0
Needs Pictures Needs Pictures:  0
Picture(s) thanks Picture(s) thanks:  0
Page 2 of 2 FirstFirst 12
Results 16 to 26 of 26
  1. #16
    Join Date
    Apr 2006
    Location
    Hobart
    Posts
    5,140

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by John G View Post
    Here it is. Criticism of its design flaws unnecessary. Yes it has no cone section. Yes it has no ramp.

    But if i go to the effort of making/buying a better mini, will it capture significantly more than the 1% I currently miss? Or am I better off getting a better shopvac?

    Attachment 184224Attachment 184225

    I addition to what Pete has said, cyclones work partly by slowing the speed of the air - its a long way around the circumference of a cyclone, and airs ability to carry chips depends very much on the speed of that air. Lots of airborn dust on windy days, none on still days.

    On Your cyclone the inlet and exit pipes appear to be the same size. This means that the airspeed in both pipes will be the same - the cyclone will blow at the same rate as it sucks. If the outlet pipe is significantly larger - say about two-thirds the diameter of the cyclone then it should slow the exit speed substantially, and leave more dust in the cyclone. Just a couple of feet of thicker tube should do it, and then a tapered reducer to your existing hose.

    Also, how far into the cyclone does the exit tube extend? It should reach the "stall point" of the cyclone, possible one third the length of the cyclone, but I do not know how to calculate that accurately. Probably trial and error needed.

    Fair Winds

    Graeme

  2. # ADS
    Google Adsense Advertisement
    Join Date
    Always
    Location
    Advertising world
    Posts
    Many





     
  3. #17
    Join Date
    Nov 2006
    Location
    Rockhampton
    Age
    62
    Posts
    2,236

    Default

    In the upper section of a cyclone it's all about air speed, radius (diameter) and particle size (mass), to separate the smallest particles out of the (turbulent) air dust mix and keep them against (or close to) the wall of the cyclone there must be sufficient air speed to do so, (given that the radius of the upper doesn't change and the mass of the particle stays the same) what you don't want is the small particles not being separated out and remaining in the airstream and going out the outlet, at this point you have lost the game (for the small bits at least) and it wont really matter what size the outlet is, although an outlet that is on the larger side would probably have less turbulance at the inlet to the outlet (which is desirable) which might be where Graeme is pointing

    I think BP says the area of inlet should equal the area of the outlet, been a while since I looked at his site.

    Without really knowing what happens inside a cone this is what I reckon....the conical section provides a rotating mass of (hopefully) clean air at the center where the inlet to the outlet should be, the roating mass of air helps to maintain the speed of the particles out against the cone wall, also the shape helps to and possibly increases the speed of the particles before then dropping into the collection bin, the collection bin being another area where hopefully there is no air flow (but probably air movement)

    The inlet should extend thru to the centerline of the upper cylinder but if it does this then it should also be pointed down at the appropriate angle because if it is level the air/dust mix will be crashing into the inlet every turn and causing massive turbulence, the end result possibly being worse than if the inlet was level and left flush with the upper cylinder, the minimum I would suggest for John to do is point the inlet down 10ish°


    Pete

  4. #18
    Join Date
    Apr 2006
    Location
    Hobart
    Posts
    5,140

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by pjt View Post
    I think BP says the area of inlet should equal the area of the outlet, been a while since I looked at his site.

    I could not find where Bill Pentz discusses inlet/outlet sizing, but in his drawings for an 18 inch cyclone:

    * Circular outlet diameter = half cyclone diameter = 9'

    * Rectangular Inlet height = half cyclone diameter = outlet diameter = 9"

    * Inlet width = half inlet height = 4.5"

    Thus:

    * Outlet Area = Pi * (9/2)^2 = 63.6 square inches

    * Inlet Area = 4.5 * 9 = 40.5 square inches

    * Outlet Area/inlet area = 63.6 / 40.5 = 1.57

    Thus the area of the outlet is almost 60% larger than the inlet.

    Bill's Cyclone & Dust Collection Research - Cyclone Plans

    I have seen other sources advocating even larger outlet diameters - up to 70% of the cyclone diameter - than the 50% ratio apparently advocated by Bill. But I am unsure of the science, there.

    Fair Winds

    Graeme

  5. #19
    Join Date
    Nov 2006
    Location
    Rockhampton
    Age
    62
    Posts
    2,236

    Default

    Good to see you are on the ball Graeme, 60% is quite a significant difference,
    I have made a large and small cyclone and made them both with equal inlet outlet areas, seems to work OK certainly wouldn't go smaller on the outlet


    Pete

  6. #20
    Join Date
    Apr 2006
    Location
    Hobart
    Posts
    5,140

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by pjt View Post
    Good to see you are on the ball Graeme, 60% is quite a significant difference,
    I have made a large and small cyclone and made them both with equal inlet outlet areas, seems to work OK certainly wouldn't go smaller on the outlet


    Pete

    Good Morning Pete

    Interesting; were your large and small cyclones used on the same system? If so, how did they compare?

    Fair Winds

    Graeme

  7. #21
    Join Date
    Nov 2006
    Location
    Rockhampton
    Age
    62
    Posts
    2,236

    Default

    HI Graeme,
    The small cyclone's home is on the drop saw, it also gets used elsewhere depending on the job, I did a WIP https://www.woodworkforums.com/f200/v...ne-wip-129797/

    The large is the main system that all my other machines are hooked up to
    dust collector.jpg

    This one is a bit interesting, it's looking up the cone to the impellor, you can see the clean tracks around the inside of the top cylinder, also looks like some polishing of the weld at the junction of the cylinder and cone, the chips/dust do about 3 turns that can be seen before dissappearing, it also shows the importance of angling the inlet duct down so that the air/dust mix that has done 1 turn doesn't crash into the incoming air/dust
    looking up the cone.jpg


    Pete

  8. #22
    Join Date
    Apr 2006
    Location
    Hobart
    Posts
    5,140

    Default

    Thanks, Pete. As ever a picture says more than a thousand words....

    Looks like an effective set-up.

    Fair Winds

    Graeme

  9. #23
    Join Date
    Aug 2002
    Location
    Williamstown, Melbourne
    Posts
    486

    Default

    BTW, I went to the Melb Woodwork show today, and carbatec was selling the mini dust deputies for $170. Most had gone by the time I saw them.

    I didn't get one as I hope to make an updated/better version of mine.

  10. #24
    Join Date
    Jun 2009
    Location
    Melbourne
    Posts
    15

    Default DIY Dust Deputy

    I can recommend the dust deputy. Carbatec now has the DIY version of the dust deputy for $69-... but you have to supply all your own fittings. It works well. Better than I expected and probably better than 99%. I tested it with some chalk from the kids blackboard and it collected all of it.

    I have it siliconed and bolted to a large metal Paint tin and driven by 2 old household vacuums. It does not block up the vaccums paper bags. I use it on the CSMS, Sml contractors table saw and the router and to vacuum the floor.

    I was trying to build my own cyclone from sheet metal and other bits on and off over 18 months. Needless to say my metal and soldering skills were not up to the task. The DIY Dust Deputy was a very quick fix and at $69- plus some fittings I consider it a cheap fix too.

    I imported one of the DIY dust deputys from America. This was only possible because I have family in the USA who received and posted the box to Australia on my behalf. The cost was $USD 39- and postage about $USD 20-25.

    This week Carbatec has them available at $69-. I saw them 2 weeks ago when I visited carbatec and they are exactly the same as what I organised.

    Hope this helps


    Andy T

  11. #25
    Join Date
    Dec 2005
    Location
    Canberra
    Posts
    3,260

    Default

    $69? Dammit, I just spent a half-day working out plans to make my own!!!!! No excuse not to buy one now!

  12. #26
    Join Date
    Aug 2002
    Location
    Williamstown, Melbourne
    Posts
    486

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Master Splinter View Post
    No excuse not to buy one now!
    It's not as much fun as making your own!

    Since my original posts I've slowly worked on it every second weekend or so. Progress is slow, lots of trial and error, but I'm getting close now. I'll post a set of photos once it's done.

Page 2 of 2 FirstFirst 12

Similar Threads

  1. 3ph versus 1ph . cyclone v bag filter
    By gingerbeer86 in forum DUST EXTRACTION
    Replies: 16
    Last Post: 10th October 2011, 12:37 AM
  2. Mini cyclone
    By groeneaj in forum DUST EXTRACTION
    Replies: 6
    Last Post: 22nd August 2009, 10:43 AM
  3. Mini Cyclone WIP
    By Al B in forum METALWORK FORUM
    Replies: 28
    Last Post: 20th February 2009, 06:48 PM
  4. Mini-cyclone
    By jmk89 in forum TRITON / GMC
    Replies: 1
    Last Post: 19th March 2007, 05:18 PM
  5. My mini cyclone
    By tony2096 in forum DUST EXTRACTION
    Replies: 10
    Last Post: 5th July 2004, 11:06 PM

Tags for this Thread

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •