Results 1 to 14 of 14
  1. #1
    Join Date
    Jan 2001
    Location
    Langwarrin, Victoria, Australia
    Age
    56
    Posts
    677

    Default PVC Duct and Static

    Ok learned ones. I have read a couple of posts on this forum that suggested static electricity build up in PVC ducting causing sparks and unwanted fires is considered b.s. based on unsound science.

    The other day, I happened to be talking to a nice fell at ezyduct, who was quite chatty even when I told him his product was way too rich for my blood.

    Anyway, during our chat he asked about how I was planning to deal with static build up. He evidently has has a customer who has ezyduct, but also has a section of PVC (presumably an industrial installation), and has had several fires.

    Can someone explain why static is believed NOT to be a problem ?
    Glenn Visca

  2. # ADS
    Google Adsense Advertisement
    Join Date
    Always
    Location
    Advertising world
    Age
    2010
    Posts
    Many





     
  3. #2
    Join Date
    Dec 2008
    Location
    Adelaide, SA
    Posts
    962

    Default

    Watching this thread with interest.

  4. #3
    Join Date
    Aug 2007
    Location
    Saskatoon, SK, Canada.
    Posts
    1,439

    Default

    How about this for starters?

    Pete

  5. #4
    Join Date
    Feb 2006
    Location
    Perth
    Posts
    27,795

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Glenn.Visca View Post
    Ok learned ones. I have read a couple of posts on this forum that suggested static electricity build up in PVC ducting causing sparks and unwanted fires is considered b.s. based on unsound science.

    The other day, I happened to be talking to a nice fell at ezyduct, who was quite chatty even when I told him his product was way too rich for my blood.

    Anyway, during our chat he asked about how I was planning to deal with static build up. He evidently has has a customer who has ezyduct, but also has a section of PVC (presumably an industrial installation), and has had several fires.

    Can someone explain why static is believed NOT to be a problem ?
    Not this old hoary chestnut again.

    Form a scientific perspective I agree with this guy.
    http://home.comcast.net/~rodec/woodw.../DC_myths.html

  6. #5
    Join Date
    Dec 2005
    Location
    Canberra
    Posts
    3,260

    Default

    https://home.comcast.net/~rodec/wood.../DC_myths.html

    Fires are more likely to be due to smoldering embers in the dust, not the material of the ducts.

  7. #6
    Join Date
    Aug 2007
    Location
    Saskatoon, SK, Canada.
    Posts
    1,439

    Default

    Great minds think alike.

    Pete

  8. #7
    Join Date
    Jan 2001
    Location
    Langwarrin, Victoria, Australia
    Age
    56
    Posts
    677

    Default

    Asked and answered ... In spades ! Thanks !
    Glenn Visca

  9. #8
    Join Date
    Apr 2006
    Location
    near Mackay
    Age
    59
    Posts
    4,635

    Default

    When I built my cyclone, I used Bill Pentz's site for reference, I also went with his recommendation regarding PVC pipe.
    I have had a fire in my cyclone, it was not caused by static, but from cutting a billet of Dead Finish up on the bandsaw, if I remember correctly Ttit had a fire from cutting some of the same log.
    I started a thread about it back then, will see if I can find it.
    Here 'tis -
    https://www.woodworkforums.com/showth...t=fire+cyclone
    ​Brad.

  10. #9
    Join Date
    Jan 2001
    Location
    Langwarrin, Victoria, Australia
    Age
    56
    Posts
    677

    Default

    Ironwood,

    I read your fire thread and also the cyclone build thread. Both made interesting reading. Thanks !
    Glenn Visca

  11. #10
    Join Date
    Feb 2006
    Location
    Perth
    Posts
    27,795

    Default

    Reading the previous two posts brought to mind that a smoke source and a basic smoke detector could be a useful way of testing the fine dust capture capability of a dust extraction system.

    It's not quite as straightforward as it sounds as the smoke source has to be at the source of the dust making activity with the blades etc at full speed. e.g. it's not an adequate test for a TS blade guard unless the blade is going around as the blade contributes significantly to the dispersion of duct.

    Cutting a piece of hard wood with a blunt blade to generate the smoke is not really that desirable but that would be the closest valid test I can think of.

  12. #11
    Join Date
    Jan 2001
    Location
    Langwarrin, Victoria, Australia
    Age
    56
    Posts
    677

    Default

    Ummm ... I don't think I am following. The smoke detector to detect smoke ? Or dust ?
    Glenn Visca

  13. #12
    Join Date
    Feb 2006
    Location
    Perth
    Posts
    27,795

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Glenn.Visca View Post
    Ummm ... I don't think I am following. The smoke detector to detect smoke ? Or dust ?
    Smoke - as an analog of dust.

    Smoke will move around like fine dust so the smoke from from a smoking saw will go where the fine dust goes. If your DC is grabbing all the fine dust it will also grab all the smoke.

    So if you place the smoke detector in a certain part of the shed and generate the smoke by/at a machine the detector will tell you if your DC is grabbing all the fine dust. If not the fine dust (nmoke) will eventually make its way to the location of the detector.

    If you have your DC inside a shed this will also show if your DC is capturing the fine dust - i.e. filter is working and DC not leaking.

    If you decide to do this test please be careful and don't set your shed alight.

  14. #13
    Join Date
    Apr 2006
    Location
    near Mackay
    Age
    59
    Posts
    4,635

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Glenn.Visca View Post
    Ironwood,

    I read your fire thread and also the cyclone build thread. Both made interesting reading. Thanks !
    No worries .

    I dont know what has happened to the photos, they seem to have disappeared .
    ​Brad.

  15. #14
    Join Date
    Jan 2001
    Location
    Langwarrin, Victoria, Australia
    Age
    56
    Posts
    677

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by BobL View Post
    Smoke - as an analog of dust.

    Smoke will move around like fine dust so the smoke from from a smoking saw will go where the fine dust goes. If your DC is grabbing all the fine dust it will also grab all the smoke.

    So if you place the smoke detector in a certain part of the shed and generate the smoke by/at a machine the detector will tell you if your DC is grabbing all the fine dust. If not the fine dust (nmoke) will eventually make its way to the location of the detector.

    If you have your DC inside a shed this will also show if your DC is capturing the fine dust - i.e. filter is working and DC not leaking.

    If you decide to do this test please be careful and don't set your shed alight.
    No plans to even attempt. I have enough jobs on my plate at the moment.

    Mind you, I do have a couple of blades that are excellent at producing smoke !
    Glenn Visca

Similar Threads

  1. Bad static in car stereo
    By garfield in forum MOTOR VEHICLES
    Replies: 6
    Last Post: 18th January 2011, 08:45 PM
  2. Static on the phone
    By Grumpy John in forum COMPUTERS
    Replies: 8
    Last Post: 13th March 2010, 08:56 PM
  3. PVC static woahs: be gone!
    By Malibu in forum HINTS & TIPS
    Replies: 24
    Last Post: 24th November 2006, 12:24 PM
  4. static electricity
    By Zed in forum NOTHING AT ALL TO DO WITH WOODWORK
    Replies: 18
    Last Post: 16th September 2005, 11:31 AM
  5. A question of static...
    By Finger Dicer in forum DUST EXTRACTION
    Replies: 23
    Last Post: 28th April 2005, 11:08 PM

Tags for this Thread

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •