Thanks Thanks:  0
Likes Likes:  0
Needs Pictures Needs Pictures:  0
Picture(s) thanks Picture(s) thanks:  0
Results 1 to 7 of 7

Thread: Router Box

  1. #1
    Join Date
    Dec 2011
    Location
    Brisbane
    Posts
    454

    Default Router Box

    All this talk of visible and invisible dust has me thinking of building a router box (probably has an official name) it probably would be a good long term investment, even if I don’t currently have space for it.

    I still have a 700mm x 700mm x 6mm piece of acrylic from the dust extractor I was going to build, but it now looks like I will be going down a more conventional route so there is no longer a need to see inside.

    Based on my limited experience with the router it does kick up an awful lot of dust and Bob’s dust paranoia has started seeping into my psyche.

    Seriously though a 6” DC attached to one of those boxes and we are talking some serious dust collection, and a lot of time saved cleaning up afterwards.

    Only problem is trying to work out how big to make it. Since my immediate need is based around speakers, I envisage it being somewhere around 60” long and maybe 18” - 24” deep and maybe 24” high.

    Or do you make it say 24” square and put a big plastic bag (DC bag) on one end to allow fitment of bigger pieces of wood?

  2. # ADS
    Google Adsense Advertisement
    Join Date
    Always
    Location
    Advertising world
    Posts
    Many





     
  3. #2
    Join Date
    Feb 2006
    Location
    Perth
    Posts
    27,795

    Default

    Is the box for dust collection of free form routing?

    If so, 1200 cfm through a cross section of 1 ft x 1ft only has an air speed of 1200 fpm or 20 ft/s (6 m/s) won't be enough to pick up the big chips and the box will fill up with these chips. To pick up chips you need about 20 m/s

    The enclosed router boxes I have referred to in my posts are router table/cabinets with the router motor enclosed and vented from underneath.

  4. #3
    Join Date
    Dec 2011
    Location
    Brisbane
    Posts
    454

    Default

    Correct that is the intended purpose… how big would you define a big chip to be?
    I am working on the assumption that by keeping the dust localised to the area, it has to be more efficient then letting it fly off the work bench onto the floor, and trying to pick it up from there.
    Also would using it with MDF dust make any difference to the equation? As I find that most MDF dust is more like fine powder.
    I was thinking of having the pickup point fairly low, as to not drag the dust up into the router, and closer to the level at which it comes off the router.
    Was also thinking of introducing the fresh air from the top so as to pull the dust away from the router.

    Edit:
    Could through a bit of creativity make some kind of mesh floor to the box, and have a four sided sloping hood, much like a range hood but upside down so any dust that naturally get flung to a wall falls down into the catchment area.

  5. #4
    Join Date
    Dec 2011
    Location
    Brisbane
    Posts
    454

    Default

    A quick knockup of the idea...

  6. #5
    Join Date
    Feb 2006
    Location
    Perth
    Posts
    27,795

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by HeadScratcher View Post
    Correct that is the intended purpose… how big would you define a big chip to be?
    I am working on the assumption that by keeping the dust localised to the area, it has to be more efficient then letting it fly off the work bench onto the floor, and trying to pick it up from there.
    The cross over point between chip and dust is somewhat arbitrary. I equate chips with what falls out more or less immediately, smaller than that is visible dust, and then invisible dust.

    Also would using it with MDF dust make any difference to the equation? As I find that most MDF dust is more like fine powder.
    Yes it will but even though MDF makes more invisible dust the majority is still usually visible hence wont stay suspended in under 20 m/s. A figure I can remember is sanding MDF with 240 grit produces around 40% invisible dust.

    Could through a bit of creativity make some kind of mesh floor to the box, and have a four sided sloping hood, much like a range hood but upside down so any dust that naturally get flung to a wall falls down into the catchment area.
    To me it sounds like a complete enclosure would just get in the way. I like the idea of a box with mesh floor that chips can fall into. To reduce chip scatter the box could also have low sides. This is starting to sound like a downdraft table. Maybe combine that with a fume hood of some kind. That would make it easier to work under than an enclosed box as it should still grab the invisible dust. Remember that the invisible dust does not come away with anywhere near as much momentum as the chips so depending on cutter profile, the scattering of invisible and other gaseous MDF nasties from a router is probably nowhere near as bad a what the chips indicate might be the case.

    A downdraft table with low sides and a fume hood above with curtains around it could be useful for all manner of power tools like planers, sanders and routers. These can be made removable to use on existing benches.

    Although I want to focus on machinery for the moment, dust generation and movement by power tools is something I will definitely test in the future.

  7. #6
    Join Date
    Dec 2011
    Location
    Brisbane
    Posts
    454

    Default

    ok a low sided table could be on the cards... meanwhile I have knocked up version 2 with one side on a hinge, so it could be put down to make a smaller bow or lifted up to make a bigger box.

    A door on the end for arm holes and putting materials in and out... (not shown) could be a curtain perhaps.

    Not a big fan of dusk masks or crap in the face, so like the idea of the clear acrylic sheet between me and the dust.

  8. #7
    Join Date
    Dec 2011
    Location
    Brisbane
    Posts
    454

    Default

    Reverting back to a simpler idea... A dog flap on the opposite side to the working end. For as often as I would probably work on oversized wood, I could probably sweep the floor. Besides it would still limit the amount of fling off, and most would fall back into the hood below.

Similar Threads

  1. Replies: 3
    Last Post: 22nd December 2009, 11:14 PM
  2. Replies: 4
    Last Post: 6th June 2005, 11:14 AM

Tags for this Thread

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •