Page 3 of 3 FirstFirst 123
Results 31 to 35 of 35
  1. #31
    Join Date
    Feb 2006
    Location
    Perth
    Posts
    27,793

    Default

    At the mens shed I used to go to their usually overly full Clearvue wheelie bin sawdust receptacle would be emptied into their community veggie garden but my observation was that unless it is well mixed with soil, fine sawdust was a poor mulching material as it tended to compact and bind as a layer on the surface when it got wet and reduced water penetration. Also, Just adding it to soil without added nitrogen did not help plant growth.

    Another factor to consider if the bins aware decided to be used as separators is their squarish cross section shape. I know the OP simply had an inlet and outlet in the lid but that would have 1) provided very poor separation and 2) been highly resistant to flow leaving most of the fine dust back in the shed. The former issue, 1) might have been improved by using a curved flow entry path eg a Thein type setup BUT the squarish cross section would interfere with the air rotation, cause great turbulence and been even more restrictive to flow.

  2. # ADS
    Google Adsense Advertisement
    Join Date
    Always
    Location
    Advertising world
    Posts
    Many





     
  3. #32
    Join Date
    Jun 2023
    Location
    Tasmania
    Posts
    69

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by BobL View Post
    At the mens shed I used to go to their usually overly full Clearvue wheelie bin sawdust receptacle would be emptied into their community veggie garden but my observation was that unless it is well mixed with soil, fine sawdust was a poor mulching material as it tended to compact and bind as a layer on the surface when it got wet and reduced water penetration. Also, Just adding it to soil without added nitrogen did not help plant growth.

    Another factor to consider if the bins aware decided to be used as separators is their squarish cross section shape. I know the OP simply had an inlet and outlet in the lid but that would have 1) provided very poor separation and 2) been highly resistant to flow leaving most of the fine dust back in the shed. The former issue, 1) might have been improved by using a curved flow entry path eg a Thein type setup BUT the squarish cross section would interfere with the air rotation, cause great turbulence and been even more restrictive to flow.
    Thanks for input
    I've used this for mulch for years and hadn't seen it compact.
    But I'd mainly have buzzer/thickneser shavings (not helical).
    Oh and plenty of bark from the gum trees.

    Hadn't thought square vs round! Oh!
    One thing I can at least try it out.
    Edit: now you've got me thinking might just use one of the 200l blue plastic drums the teat spray comes in.
    Put wheels on and find other use for lidless wheelie bin

  4. #33
    Join Date
    Aug 2007
    Location
    Saskatoon, SK, Canada.
    Posts
    1,439

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by BobL View Post
    Another factor to consider if the bins aware decided to be used as separators is their squarish cross section shape. I know the OP simply had an inlet and outlet in the lid but that would have 1) provided very poor separation and 2) been highly resistant to flow leaving most of the fine dust back in the shed. The former issue, 1) might have been improved by using a curved flow entry path eg a Thein type setup BUT the squarish cross section would interfere with the air rotation, cause great turbulence and been even more restrictive to flow.
    Bob as you know I came across some papers on square and hexagonal cyclones. Some of the papers say in a nutshell that while the resistance to flow is higher the separation of small/fine particles improves due to vortexes in the corners. I think much the same as the swirls formed behind boulders in a stream drop silt where the mainstream carries them along. Could the increased turbulence in the corners of the wheelie bin help with some separation at least until the bin volume decreases?

    Pete

  5. #34
    Join Date
    Jun 2023
    Location
    Tasmania
    Posts
    69

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by QC Inspector View Post
    Bob as you know I came across some papers on square and hexagonal cyclones. Some of the papers say in a nutshell that while the resistance to flow is higher the separation of small/fine particles improves due to vortexes in the corners. I think much the same as the swirls formed behind boulders in a stream drop silt where the mainstream carries them along. Could the increased turbulence in the corners of the wheelie bin help with some separation at least until the bin volume decreases?

    Pete
    I've decided to give it a crack.
    Put a lid on it and play with in/outlets and hook it upto my Dawn blower.
    It might be too powerful and just clean the bin out.
    Waiting on parts for my thicknesser so won't be making serious shavings for a while

  6. #35
    Join Date
    Feb 2006
    Location
    Perth
    Posts
    27,793

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by QC Inspector View Post
    Bob as you know I came across some papers on square and hexagonal cyclones. Some of the papers say in a nutshell that while the resistance to flow is higher the separation of small/fine particles improves due to vortexes in the corners. I think much the same as the swirls formed behind boulders in a stream drop silt where the mainstream carries them along. Could the increased turbulence in the corners of the wheelie bin help with some separation at least until the bin volume decreases?

    Pete
    I'm not sure, but given the OP's not using it as cyclone ie no side entry and no "conification", there's unlikely to be any cyclonic action. The main issue with not using it, is separators restricting flow and hence not collecting the maximum amount of air/dust back in the workshop.


    I've used this for mulch for years and hadn't seen it compact.
    But I'd mainly have buzzer/thickneser shavings (not helical).
    Oh and plenty of bark from the gum trees.
    Shavings and bark are great mulch starters. The stuff I was referring to had a fair bit of sanding dust in it. I know that stables won't take sawdust that has a too much sanding dust in it as it combines with horse pee to make a horrible mud.

Page 3 of 3 FirstFirst 123

Similar Threads

  1. A Dyson Dual Cyclone Dust Extractor
    By Turbulance in forum DUST EXTRACTION
    Replies: 5
    Last Post: 29th September 2010, 02:13 PM
  2. dust bin ports may be to small
    By la Huerta in forum DUST EXTRACTION
    Replies: 3
    Last Post: 22nd July 2005, 08:02 PM
  3. dust extraction for bandsaws
    By Ivor in forum BANDSAWS
    Replies: 20
    Last Post: 16th February 2005, 06:09 PM
  4. Triton Dust Collector Bag
    By al2 in forum TRITON / GMC
    Replies: 4
    Last Post: 16th September 2004, 09:18 AM
  5. Questions on Dust Extraction
    By Arron in forum DUST EXTRACTION
    Replies: 7
    Last Post: 25th July 2003, 09:53 PM

Tags for this Thread

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •