Thanks Thanks:  0
Likes Likes:  0
Needs Pictures Needs Pictures:  0
Picture(s) thanks Picture(s) thanks:  0
Results 1 to 10 of 10
  1. #1
    Join Date
    May 2004
    Location
    Melbourne, Australia
    Posts
    523

    Default workbench height relative to tablesaw height

    I've managed to get my hands on some secondhand timber and I'm hoping I'll have enough to finally make a reasonable workbench.

    As I have a small workshop, I was thinking that I might be able to also use the workbench as an out-feed table for my table saw. (The workbench would probably be located behind the table saw anyway.) I was therefore thinking of making the workbench the same height, or a smidgen shorter, than the table saw. However, I recall that most dedicated out-feed tables have mitre gauge slots extended into them. I figure if I don't have slots, I'd have to ensure that the workbench was far enough behind the table saw so that it doesn't interfere with the mitre gauge.

    Another thought occurred to me. What if I make the workbench height 16mm shorter than the table saw. This should allow sufficient clearance for the mitre gauge, and when cutting sheet material or ripping, I could place a 16mm piece of melamine on top of the bench to bring it back to the same height.

    Questions:
    1. Has, or does, anyone use their workbench as an outfeed support? If so, is it practical, or is it too much bother to clear the bench to use it as an out feed support?
    2. What height, relative to a tablesaw, would you recommend?
    3. Is the idea of having the bench 16mm lower plus a extra 16mm top worth considering, or isn't the height of the outfeed support that critical?
    I'd be interested in any views, thoughts, or tips on this.

    Chris

  2. # ADS
    Google Adsense Advertisement
    Join Date
    Always
    Location
    Advertising world
    Posts
    Many





     
  3. #2
    Join Date
    Feb 2003
    Location
    Garvoc VIC AUSTRALIA
    Posts
    11,464

    Default

    Your outfeed table should be the same height as the saw table
    Using a packing piece is ok as long as it is secure.

    Is your proposed workbench height going to be comfortable to work at?
    Regards, Bob Thomas

    www.wombatsawmill.com

  4. #3
    Join Date
    Apr 2006
    Location
    Brookfield, Brisbane
    Posts
    5,800

    Default

    i have my table saw sunk into a hole in the end of my bench so that the top is level with bench. but am thinking of removing it as i find i spread out when working and then i need the saw again witch means clearing the current work and i have found it to be to much trouble. make tour self a couple of feed supports (tall narrow saw horses maby with rolers on them).

    www.carlweiss.com.au
    Mobile Sawmilling & Logging Service
    8" & 10" Lucas Mills, bobcat, 4wd tractor, 12 ton dozer, stihl saws.

  5. #4
    Join Date
    Oct 2005
    Location
    Yass
    Age
    64
    Posts
    1,196

    Default

    My bench is about 800mm behind the table saw, and a few mm shorter. Works well as an outfeed table on longer rips, and doesn't interfere with the miter gauge. There's enough room to walk between the bench and saw, so I don't ever have to move either one. For shorter boards, I end up holding it with the push stick until the blade stops and walking around.

    Tex

  6. #5
    Join Date
    Nov 2003
    Location
    Australia and France
    Posts
    8,175

    Default

    My bench is the same height as the TS and in front of it, so works as a infeed for longer stuff. Works WELL.

    My router bench is behind the TS by a similar distance and works as an outfeed table, also at the same height. Some thin pieces do deflect downwards, so I'll get around to adding a slight (say 5mm x 20mm wide chamfer on the face one day. It's far more useful having it at the same height as you can move it and use it to support other things, long lengths, sheet material etc.

    I have a small vice on the "leading" edge of the router bench, and can make a higher support simply by bunging a bit of board in it horizontally.

    I have a sharpening bench to the left hand sided and about 1200 away from the TS, which is set at the same height. I clamp a bit of MDF or a timber packer on it if necessary to bring it up to the height of the sled, and with this set up, can cross cut 2400 widths.

    I have actually put a spacer in the TS between the stand and the body, to increase the height a bit to where a comfortable bench height is for me, then made all the other bits to suit.

    It's definitely worth doing, particularly in a small space, and it tends to force you to put things away too. (I have a couple of stools, a workmate and a collapsable cutting table all set up at jointer height as well!)

    You can see how it works in plan here I think:
    http://woodworkforums.com/showthread...idges+playroom

    I really should update that thread!

    Cheers,

    P

  7. #6
    Join Date
    May 2004
    Location
    Melbourne, Australia
    Posts
    523

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by echnidna View Post
    Is your proposed workbench height going to be comfortable to work at?
    The two workbench designs I'm considering are the Triton "Intermediate Project No. 10" and the "Kirby bench" in "The Workbench Book" by Landis. I like the size and the construction of the "Kirby" bench top, but I prefer the general design of the "Triton" frame and legs, but with the "Kirby" joinery. The "Triton" design also has an end vise and dog holes which I also like. I'll just pick and choose design elements from both.

    My table saw is 34", or 863mm, high. The Triton design is 915mm (36") high, while the Kirby design is 34" (863mm) high. Would you consider 34" (863mm) high for a workbench to be too low? Would it be better at 36"?

  8. #7
    Join Date
    Nov 2003
    Location
    Australia and France
    Posts
    8,175

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by chrisp View Post
    My table saw is 34", or 863mm, high. The Triton design is 915mm (36") high, while the Kirby design is 34" (863mm) high. Would you consider 34" (863mm) high for a workbench to be too low? Would it be better at 36"?
    Depends on how tall you are.

    P

  9. #8
    Join Date
    May 2004
    Location
    Melbourne, Australia
    Posts
    523

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by bitingmidge View Post
    Depends on how tall you are.
    I kind of figured that. I suppose it also depends on the use of the bench? I'd image a bench used for "dark side" hand planing might want to be taller than one used to assemble furniture? I'm sort of average height ~ 180cm, and do very little "dark side" work other than final finishing. Any recommendations on height?

  10. #9
    Join Date
    Nov 2003
    Location
    Australia and France
    Posts
    8,175

    Default

    Mine's 940mm which makes it a nice height to sit at on a stool as well.

    As I said above, I put a spacer in the TS stand to bring it up to that height.

    Cheers,

    P

  11. #10
    Join Date
    May 2004
    Location
    Melbourne, Australia
    Posts
    523

    Smile

    Thank you all for the helpful replies.

    It seems that most agree that making the workbench the same height as the table saw is a good idea. Now all I've got to work out is what height the bench ought to be

    I try and check out some possible work bench heights and see what seems to work best. Raising the table saw a couple of inches or so shouldn't be too hard.

    Thanks again.

    Chris

Similar Threads

  1. Domino Height Adjuster confusion
    By Flowboy in forum FESTOOL FORUM
    Replies: 15
    Last Post: 30th September 2006, 08:07 AM
  2. Workbench height
    By chrisb691 in forum THE WORK BENCH
    Replies: 10
    Last Post: 6th January 2006, 05:16 PM
  3. Blade Height Winder Review
    By Noel Butcher in forum TRITON / GMC
    Replies: 6
    Last Post: 13th May 2000, 02:31 PM

Tags for this Thread

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •