Page 2 of 2 FirstFirst 12
Results 16 to 23 of 23
  1. #16
    Join Date
    Feb 2006
    Location
    Perth
    Posts
    27,756

    Default

    I'm 1820 mm tall and 710 mm from floor to pinkie knuckle (I have short legs and long arms)

    My regular work bench is 905 mm high and is adjustable between about 895 and 945mm high. It has two conventional WW vices, both are flush with the top of the bench. I've tried a number of different work heights but 905 was what I found best for hand tool work.
    However I spend most of my time at this bench doing repairs and electrical work/testing while sitting on a stool.

    My assembly bench (usually covered in crap) is 910 mm high - height is also adjustable but I have not tried different heights.
    It has a 4" machine vice at one end that is mainly used for tapping and threading.
    When I clear some of the crap it is used for mechanical work

    My welding bench is currently a fixed 890mm high. Most welding is on workpieces held in a 6" fabricated steel vice that is quite tall and this means I don't have to bend down too far to weld which I do while standing although sometimes for really small stiff I do it sitting on a stool. The vice is attached to a 50 x 50 mm SHS post that fits into a SHS socket welding into the bench frame that can easily be removed if I want to weld large things camped to the table top. This means I can also weld sitting down. The vice can also be height adjusted if required although I have hardly ever done this and it usually sits at almost its lowest point. This bench was originally made in 2012? and meant to be ~900 mm including a 25mm thick steel top but after fabricating the frame I didn't proceed with such a thick top due to the cost of such thick plate so I temporarily placed some pieces of 6mm thick steel plate on it for a top. Only last month did I manage to pick up some 12mm thick steel plate for $0

    There are also two side benches which are 910 mm high - one is used for things like electrolysis and Zinc Plating etc the other is covered in crap.

  2. # ADS
    Google Adsense Advertisement
    Join Date
    Always
    Location
    Advertising world
    Posts
    Many





     
  3. #17
    Join Date
    Apr 2011
    Location
    McBride BC Canada
    Posts
    3,543

    Default

    BobL: These are the two signs which hung my my professor's research lab (LaTrobe/Botany) for decades. I have them in my shop.

    A CREATIVE MESS IS BETTER THAN TIDY IDLENESS

    EXTRICATE THY DIGIT

  4. #18
    Join Date
    Feb 2016
    Location
    Perth WA Australia
    Posts
    828

    Default

    Have you got a copy of Chris Schwarz workbench book? If not, its an excellent read on various workbenches and the why including dimensions.

    He does prefer a low bench, There's a couple of reasons why the first being due to modern handplanes raises the height of your hand by a couple of inches and secondly because he believes if you're hand planing you'll want to have a workbench that's low so you use your legs/core rather than your arms. He also recommends if you've never worked on a low workbench to knock together a platform to stand on to raise yourself above your existing bench to give you the feel of what its like to plane with a "low" bench.

    I'll have to agree that planing with a low bench is definitely easier but given that i don't do much hand planing, so my bench is 86 cm and i'm 170cm tall. The height of workbench, with arms resting by my sides sits halfway between my wrist and elbow. This is higher than what's recommended in Chris' book, but works well for me as i'm more of a powertool woodworker than hand tools. I do have a small hand tool workbench that's 1m tall and is ideal for dovetails etc.

    If i had the space i'd love to have an assembly table that sits around pinky finger knuckle height or lower, as there's been a few times when i've had to stand on a stool to see what i'm doing, but its a minor concern at this stage.

  5. #19
    Join Date
    May 2010
    Location
    Not far enough away from Melbourne
    Posts
    4,200

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by tonzeyd View Post
    Have you got a copy of Chris Schwarz workbench book? If not, its an excellent read on various workbenches and the why including dimensions.
    I find the works of Chris Schwarz to be a bit of an enigma. He gets so much right but he gets so much wrong as well. (This is a good point to say that this is my opinion and others may disagree and that's fine by me.) To me he is first and foremost a journalist and a historian. Second, he is a woodworker.

    Things I like about Chris Schwarz -
    Anarchist's toolchest
    Sawbenches
    Moxon Vise

    Things I dislike about Chris Schwarz -
    Roubo workbenches
    Pinky-knuckle height workbenches

    I commend the work Chris has done researching the old writings of Roubo, Moxon and others. However I think that on occasions he has missed the boat when converting his historical findings into recommendations for the 21st century woodworker.

    Times have changed. There might be a few dedicated historical reproduction craftsmen who would stand at the workbench and plane up the stock for a whole houseful of furniture but there would not be many of them. Roubo lived in a world where timber was large and plentiful. Today it is a scarce resource that needs to be conserved.

    He had a six-inch thick benchtop because timber was plentiful and he was probably working on slabs about six inches thick on top of his bench a lot of the time.Today we make furniture out of 3/4" stock and rarely anything thicker than 2". He would have been using a wooden-bodied plane a couple of inches higher than the modern metal bodied plane. So lets conservatively say that Roubo's 30" high workbench top should be raised up by 4" to account for the timber thickness and 2" for the height of the planes. That puts the new ideal height up to 36". And that's before we look at the differences in average heights of people of between Roubo's era and today when we have people like Chris Schwarz himself who made me feel incredibly short when I was standing next to him.

    I agree that the Roubo is a very solid and capable bench but I cannot understand why Schwarz is touting it as the ideal bench for today.
    I got sick of sitting around doing nothing - so I took up meditation.

  6. #20
    Join Date
    Aug 2011
    Location
    bilpin
    Posts
    3,551

    Default

    I have made all my benches with adjustable legs. 200mm travel seems to cover most requirements.

  7. #21
    Join Date
    Jul 2011
    Location
    In between houses
    Posts
    1,784

    Default

    My assembly/outfeed bench is adjustable, from about 400 high for cabinet assembly, to over 1000 for flat panels and doors etc. it works well and is on wheels so it’s versatile. Adjustable height rolling bench - YouTube

  8. #22
    Join Date
    Nov 2016
    Location
    Bris
    Posts
    840

    Default

    I'm currently building my workbench after much research. I'm short (5'5") and if I followed what most were advocating, I would have ended up with a bench height of around 825mm. That just seemed much too low. Then I came across a video by Terry Gordon where he recommends holding your planing arm by your side with your elbow bent at 90 degrees, you put the other fist below the elbow and allow a couple of inches for the material, and whatever that height comes to is your ideal bench height. This made more sense to me but I didn't want to make a final decision without first trying it out, so when I built what I call my "practise bench", I installed levelling feet on all four legs so I could experiment with varying heights. Without the feet, the bench is 880mm high and I found this too low. And with the levelling feet, I tried 925mm and I was happy with this bench height. The bench I am currently building will have a finished height of around 920mm. Don't listen to conventional wisdom. Everyone is different, build whatever suits you best.



    Cheers,
    Mike


    EDIT: Here's the video that I mentioned.

  9. #23
    Join Date
    Feb 2016
    Location
    Perth WA Australia
    Posts
    828

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by KahoyKutter View Post
    Everyone is different, build whatever suits you best.
    This is key, consider what you're building, how you're building and your space.

    For eg if you're building tall cabinets, having a lower workbench is more ideal. If you're doing alot of planing a lower bench is ideal. If you're using it as an outfeed table the height is dictated by your table saw. If you've got longer/shorter arms/legs then adjust accordingly.

    Also build according to what you do most.

Page 2 of 2 FirstFirst 12

Similar Threads

  1. workbench height
    By msrampant in forum THE WORK BENCH
    Replies: 13
    Last Post: 5th March 2013, 07:04 PM
  2. Another Carbatec Height Adjustable Workbench
    By yosam in forum THE WORK BENCH
    Replies: 3
    Last Post: 27th February 2012, 10:37 PM
  3. Carba-Tec Height Adjustable Workbench
    By GarethR in forum THE WORK BENCH
    Replies: 6
    Last Post: 4th January 2012, 07:27 AM
  4. workbench height relative to tablesaw height
    By chrisp in forum THE WORK BENCH
    Replies: 9
    Last Post: 23rd July 2007, 11:19 PM
  5. Workbench height
    By chrisb691 in forum THE WORK BENCH
    Replies: 10
    Last Post: 6th January 2006, 05:16 PM

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •