Thanks Thanks:  0
Needs Pictures Needs Pictures:  0
Picture(s) thanks Picture(s) thanks:  0
Results 1 to 5 of 5

Thread: Stanley 42x

  1. #1
    Join Date
    May 2008
    Location
    Australia
    Posts
    2,357

    Default Stanley 42x

    The hammer tip on my early 42x was no longer making close contact with the anvil. I had purchased new replacement springs thinking that would resolve the problem but that didn't help. The fault was the actual length of the tip. Or lack of to be more precise. I had an Eclipse 77 saw set in very good condition just gathering dust in the workshop. So I pulled it apart and noticed that the parts I needed were of very similar dimension. Hmm. Guess what. They are perfect match. The parts I am referring too are the large outer sleeve, the inner piston(hammer), and both the springs. Swapped these parts over. Tested out the my 42x. Sweet as.

    Stewie.

  2. # ADS
    Google Adsense Advertisement
    Join Date
    Always
    Location
    Advertising world
    Posts
    Many





     
  3. #2
    Join Date
    Dec 2013
    Location
    San Antonio, Texas, USA
    Posts
    3,070

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by planemaker View Post
    The hammer tip on my early 42x was no longer making close contact with the anvil. I had purchased new replacement springs thinking that would resolve the problem but that didn't help. The fault was the actual length of the tip. Or lack of to be more precise. I had an Eclipse 77 saw set in very good condition just gathering dust in the workshop. So I pulled it apart and noticed that the parts I needed were of very similar dimension. Hmm. Guess what. They are perfect match. The parts I am referring too are the large outer sleeve, the inner piston(hammer), and both the springs. Swapped these parts over. Tested out the my 42x. Sweet as.

    Stewie.
    What happened to the original anvil? Did it break off in pieces?
    Innovations are those useful things that, by dint of chance, manage to survive the stupidity and destructive tendencies inherent in human nature.

  4. #3
    Join Date
    May 2008
    Location
    Australia
    Posts
    2,357

    Default

    No Rob. The anvil is fine. The length of the hammer tip had been filed that far back that it no longer reached the anvil, regardless of how much pressure was applied to the pistol trigger.

    Stewie;

  5. #4
    Join Date
    Dec 2005
    Location
    Sydney
    Age
    79
    Posts
    647

    Default

    Stewie, the Eclipse hammer is 23 odd degrees vs 15 for the 42X, therefore the anvil and hammer will not line up precisely. Around the other way of course it won't work. Because the angle is higher on the 77 should work just fine... I think.

    Cheers
    Peter

  6. #5
    Join Date
    May 2008
    Location
    Australia
    Posts
    2,357

    Default

    Hi Peter. As long as the hammer angle is greater than the anvil angle it should work fine. It did crossed my mind later that the new springs I had purchased would have also given me the option of filing the shoulder back slightly on the 42x hammer. This would have allowed the flat key profile to extend further out from the key-way. I will revisit this project and take some photo's when time permits. Appreciate your feedback.

    Stewie;

Similar Threads

  1. Stanley #8 and Stanley #62 LA Plane
    By Shedhand in forum HAND TOOLS - UNPOWERED
    Replies: 5
    Last Post: 19th April 2006, 03:04 AM

Tags for this Thread

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •