Thanks Thanks:  0
Likes Likes:  0
Needs Pictures Needs Pictures:  0
Picture(s) thanks Picture(s) thanks:  0
Page 1 of 5 12345 LastLast
Results 1 to 15 of 71

Thread: Curlew

  1. #1
    Join Date
    May 2006
    Location
    Brisbane
    Age
    80
    Posts
    282

    Smile Curlew

    OK Here goes! Exposure

    A while ago me and the missus enjoyed a bird-watching weekend, in our little caravan, at Inskip Point with Birds Queensland. There were quite a few boats going out fishing, and it would have been quite handy to have a boat for some bird watching among the mangroves. Of course, having towed the caravan, there was no way we could also take a boat, which is a bit of a shame at Inskip Point.

    Well, I got to thinking about how we could take both the caravan, and a boat suitable for fishing. The obvious solution was a car-topper, but as we have a 2.2 litre Camry I wasn’t keen on the weight high up, and the windage this would represent. I started wondering about a light “break-down” model that could be slung, somehow, on the back of the caravan.

    Anyway! Below is a rough outline of what formed in my mind as we drove back from Inskip. I envisage it as having the option of oars, or a small outboard (3.5hp). Probably no sail as I think designing the rig, and the centre-case, might make the whole task too daunting. (Although it might also obviate the need for an ABP.)

    I have since decided that hanging a boat on the back of the caravan is too hard, so I'm now in the process of revising the design so that it will (just) fit in the door. We have done this with push-bikes, why not a boat? Sense of theatre. Pull up at a beach-side campsite, open the caravan door, whip out a boat, go fishing.

    There is a self-draining anchor well on the bow, with buoyancy below. Hopefully this will eliminate the irritation of having a wet/muddy anchor on the floor on the homeward leg. There is buoyancy under the centre thwart and aft seat. I figure the odd shape of this seat is acceptable, as you would be sitting to one side anyway if using an outboard. I have increased the beam at the transom to provide more bouyancy aft for occasions when she might be carrying just one person and an outboard. Also contemplating a forward thwart which would allow better weight distribution with 2-up.

    Next step. - building frame.
    Cheers,

    J

    ....

    Data isn't Information, Information isn't Knowledge, and Knowledge isn't Wisdom!

  2. # ADS
    Google Adsense Advertisement
    Join Date
    Always
    Location
    Advertising world
    Age
    2010
    Posts
    Many





     
  3. #2
    Join Date
    Jul 2005
    Location
    Ipswich QLD
    Age
    54
    Posts
    1,166

    Default Curlew

    Have you thought about one of those inflatable zodiac style boats? I don't knw a great deal about them other than seeing them on TV from time to time. From what I remember they can be stored in a fairly small space.
    Dave,
    hug the tree before you start the chainsaw.

  4. #3
    Join Date
    May 2006
    Location
    Brisbane
    Age
    80
    Posts
    282

    Default

    Hi Bluegum,

    Hmmm! I know a few people who refuse to call them inflatables, preferring the term deflatables. This was reinforced for me recently when an old friend turned up in a 70 foot steel sloop at the start of a major cruise. He picked us up from the jetty in a partly deflated "deflatable" and had to go to enormous trouble to deal with the problem leak. If only he'd had a "Curlew" folded up on deck.

    However, the real reasons for not going down this path are -

    a) Whenever we go camping, I'm the one who gets to blow up the air mattress (and everybody else's). :eek: I know, I should use a pump!

    b) I'm nuts about wooden boats.
    Cheers,

    J

    ....

    Data isn't Information, Information isn't Knowledge, and Knowledge isn't Wisdom!

  5. #4
    Join Date
    Aug 2005
    Location
    South Australia
    Age
    77
    Posts
    279

    Default

    Though about a Porta-bote?

    http://www.porta-bote.com/

  6. #5
    Join Date
    Aug 2006
    Location
    Sydney
    Age
    64
    Posts
    2,378

    Default

    howabout a canoe.

  7. #6
    Join Date
    Oct 2003
    Location
    Kentucky NSW near Tamworth, Australia
    Age
    85
    Posts
    3,737

    Default

    How about this as seen on the New Inventors on the ABC

    http://www.abc.net.au/newinventors/txt/s1706369.htm

  8. #7
    Join Date
    May 2006
    Location
    Brisbane
    Age
    80
    Posts
    282

    Default

    Thought about a Porta-bote?
    It's simple, practical, proven, probably more economical, less risky, etc etc,

    Why would I want to do that?
    Cheers,

    J

    ....

    Data isn't Information, Information isn't Knowledge, and Knowledge isn't Wisdom!

  9. #8
    Join Date
    May 2006
    Location
    Brisbane
    Age
    80
    Posts
    282

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Bleedin Thumb
    howabout a canoe.
    Yep! A canoe's on the list, but this isn't it!
    Cheers,

    J

    ....

    Data isn't Information, Information isn't Knowledge, and Knowledge isn't Wisdom!

  10. #9
    Join Date
    May 2006
    Location
    Brisbane
    Age
    80
    Posts
    282

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Barry_White
    How about this as seen on the New Inventors on the ABC
    I thought about something along these lines using flat plywood panels. Somehow it doesn't quite seem like a "real" boat.
    Probably makes sense though.
    Cheers,

    J

    ....

    Data isn't Information, Information isn't Knowledge, and Knowledge isn't Wisdom!

  11. #10
    Join Date
    May 2003
    Location
    South Oz, the big smokey bit in the middle
    Age
    67
    Posts
    4,377

    Default

    Cripes, he's going to the trouble of designing his own boat and all you lot can do is tell him to get something else :mad:

    It looks good and, being in two sections like that, you shouldn't have troubles with leaks. How are you planning to fix the two halfs together? Occky scraps :eek:

    Richard

  12. #11
    Join Date
    Oct 2003
    Location
    Kentucky NSW near Tamworth, Australia
    Age
    85
    Posts
    3,737

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Daddles
    Cripes, he's going to the trouble of designing his own boat and all you lot can do is tell him to get something else :mad:

    It looks good and, being in two sections like that, you shouldn't have troubles with leaks. How are you planning to fix the two halfs together? Occky scraps :eek:

    Richard
    A couple of "G" clamps should do it.

  13. #12
    Join Date
    May 2006
    Location
    Brisbane
    Age
    80
    Posts
    282

    Wink

    Quote Originally Posted by Daddles
    How are you planning to fix the two halfs together? Occky scraps :eek:
    Ah well, that's another whole story! We had some discussion on this topic recently when I designed our (WBAQ) boat for the Caloundra Classic Regatta, Rough & Ready Boat Building competition. The scheme was that we entered two teams and each built half a boat (2 sheets of ply each). At the last minute we joined them together to create a 26 footer that carried a crew of four paddlers around the course next day.

    We won by half a course. You can't beat waterline length!

    Anyway, our skipper has a Bolger Folding Schooner so he's the expert and reckons lashings are the way to go. In this case I plan to use the rubber rings used to seal drainage pipes. One at each gunwale and one at the bottom centre (on a small skeg extension). I'll also have a couple of plugs matching a couple of rebates to ensure correct registration of the two "transoms".

    It will all become clear (including to me) as it progresses.
    Cheers,

    J

    ....

    Data isn't Information, Information isn't Knowledge, and Knowledge isn't Wisdom!

  14. #13
    Join Date
    May 2006
    Location
    Brisbane
    Age
    80
    Posts
    282

    Default

    A friend has just pointed out that "it's already been done" and referred to an article on p16 of AABB #46 (June 2004). In which Lindsey Turvey shares the experience of building Spindrift from B&B Yacht Designs at http://www.bandbyachtdesigns.com/spin.htm

    Now there's a challenge, they have included a centreboard.
    Looks pretty neat too!

    Undaunted, we carry on (with a possible detour via the drawing board).

    One interesting point with Spindrift is that they scarfed the ply sheets to get the required 12 foot lengths, then cut it in half, after construction, to separate the two boats. Makes sense for getting the curves right but my approach was going to be making ther two halves separately. Obviously need to be very careful doing this.

    Any suggestions?

    Not obvious to me, from the AABB article, how the two halves were fastened together for use. I bit more research here perhaps.
    Cheers,

    J

    ....

    Data isn't Information, Information isn't Knowledge, and Knowledge isn't Wisdom!

  15. #14
    Join Date
    May 2006
    Location
    Brisbane
    Age
    80
    Posts
    282

    Red face Bouyancy Compartments

    I've been revising the plans to include a forward thwart to aid load balancing, and scaled down the size a bit so it can fit inside the caravan.

    I'm just about ready to start building. Bought some chip-board for the building frame and should get it cut out and assembled during the week with a bit of luck.

    Just thinking through the details and wondering how best to tackle closing off the bouancy compartments. I guess I'll bend the bottom first, then attach the bulkheads as they are key to shaping the planks. Once I start fitting decks, seat tops etc I can no longer get inside enclosed compartments fillet the join and tape over it.

    The obvious approach seems to be to glue a piece of 12 or 16 mm square framing inside the compartment then glue the final panel to this. Is this the best way or does someone have a brilliant alternative idea ?
    Cheers,

    J

    ....

    Data isn't Information, Information isn't Knowledge, and Knowledge isn't Wisdom!

  16. #15
    Join Date
    May 2006
    Location
    Brisbane
    Age
    80
    Posts
    282

    Lightbulb Learning

    You blokes probably already knew this, but I thought it worth sharing for the sake of possibly less experienced members. All my previous build, repair, or refurbish projects have single-chine hulls, either planks, or ply, over frames. Hull shape more or less guaranteed.

    With Curlew I wanted to try multi-chine construction because I had a vague notion that it would be more able to hold it's shape, given that the break in the middle means that the planks are not actually bent around anything. maybe this meant that I should have intermediate frames in the middle of each section and, if so, should they be construction moulds only, or permament?

    Well I can't afford to waste the ply (or suffer the embarrassment) if I get it wrong so I spent some time over the weekend making a paper model to prove it one way or the other.

    I was amazed at the structural integrity with absolutely no internal moulds or frames, even with the relatively poor fit that comes from sticking it all together with sellotape.

    Picture 1 is the two halves, separate, before fitting any thwarts or frames.
    Picture 2 is the two haves joined together (with paper clips).
    Picture 3 is with all the thwarts and bulkheads fitted.
    Picture 4 is in "folded" form ready to put in the caravan.

    I've made a building frame but, by this test, it might be redundant. However, I'm sure it will help get a really accurate fit without too much stress. Next thing is to move a couple of boats around to create some space, and start cutting out. Nervous? Not me!
    Cheers,

    J

    ....

    Data isn't Information, Information isn't Knowledge, and Knowledge isn't Wisdom!

Page 1 of 5 12345 LastLast

Tags for this Thread

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •