Thread: Rose given methodone, not cough medicine

I heard on the radio this afternoon that the girl had enough methadone in her body to kill an adult. For the sake of my membership and censorship i will not say any more excpet I hope the parents rot in hell.

Originally Posted by Wood Butcher

I hope the parents rot in hell.

But they wont!!

Some bleeding heart will save them and release them back into society, sort of like a tag and release. :mad:

They may be coming to a street near you. :eek:

Al

Isn't it amazing.
Given a tiny bit of information through the media, the number of people who advocate the usurping of our poor but only legal system and believe they are qualified to pass comment on others.

I only hope that you never end up on a jury.

What ever happened to that old idea that a person was
"innocent until proven guilty beyond a reasonable doubt".

I will probably be flamed for this but lynch mobs always annoy me.

Originally Posted by DavidG

Isn't it amazing.
Given a tiny bit of information through the media, the number of people who advocate the usurping of our poor

But they are only poor because they use drugs.
They have the same go at life as you and me, yet because they CHOOSE to use drugs, they deserve special treatment?? :confused:

Come on!! :eek:

Al

df gjlhdasf[ijawepk o3eqm.,w3rmmwfa
[pxc[0mlm
][_{soa]PWER;A LFIVJZXJ WAEJNQWEJKKL BASTARDS

seeing as how censorship is such a hot topic at the moment, i cant help but notice that DavidG's signature includes an image containing the word $H!T. nobody can get away with using the word in text yet it appears ok in an image????

i was on a jury, I still say string the bastards up. frikken waste of good air. I'll also have you know I was fair upright and did not victimise or pre judge the accused - he deserved what he got - fair and square, no questions!

i

Originally Posted by doug the slug

seeing as how censorship is such a hot topic at the moment, i cant help but notice that DavidG's signature includes an image containing the word $H!T. nobody can get away with using the word in text yet it appears ok in an image????

One of the owners products.

Originally Posted by

One of the owners products.

BLOODY DISCRIMINATION THATS WHAT IT IS

Originally Posted by silentC

Apparently two of her older brothers were taken into foster care a year before she was born. She was the subject of two reports to DOCS. Slipped through the cracks.....

G'Day All,
I heard that there where 26 reports on the children in that family over the last couple of years, and now DOCS is under a possible inquiry. Maybe a case of "to little, to late" was my first thought, but if it saves just one child in the future it will be worth it. This is not the first time this has happened, last time it was a little boy under similar circumstances!...Rose should never have died, DOCS screwed up last time and said it would never happen again!....Should somebody be accountable with the parents?...

Originally Posted by DavidG

What ever happened to that old idea that a person was
"innocent until proven guilty beyond a reasonable doubt".

The quote actually is " PRESUMED innocent until proven guilty".

Most of the time they are guilty but there is insufficient evidence to prove their guilt. Hence in these kind of cases I would prefer that we have the Napoleonic code of law, like most countries, where the accused should be required to prove their innocence.

BTW earlier this year I was on a jury in a culpable driving charge, after listening to all the evidence we convicted the accused. We were fair but he was guilty. My only regret was that IMO the sentence wasn't adequate.


Peter.

My little Blokes' (4&1/2 yr old) best mate is one of the lucky ones(?)DOCS have him in foster care after his "Mum" deliberately placed him in a tub of boiling water, the neighbours heard his screams and rescued him . My wife would, I believe kill this poor excuse of a person with her bare hands if she ever saw her, such is the depth of her feelings on the subject.
There are plenty of people out there that if allowed by the authorities would open their hearts to any of these kiddies and give them the love and security they deserve.

The english vocabulary does not contain strong enough terms to adequately describe these reptiles.

I still say we should not be talking about stringing some one up until after the trial.
We do NOT know all the details so we are prejudging.

When the people and press get behind something like this it can end up with a lynching.

Let the courts decide and then we can discuss it.

Originally Posted by doug the slug

seeing as how censorship is such a hot topic at the moment, i cant help but notice that DavidG's signature includes an image containing the word $H!T. nobody can get away with using the word in text yet it appears ok in an image????

$H!T's the last thing on my mind whenever I see one of your post's Doug