Thanks Thanks:  0
Needs Pictures Needs Pictures:  0
Picture(s) thanks Picture(s) thanks:  0
Results 1 to 5 of 5
  1. #1
    Join Date
    Feb 2006
    Location
    Perth
    Posts
    27,795

    Default More recycled bits of plumbing

    I had these saw vice pieces cut out some time ago but was uhming'n'ahing about what clamping bolts to use. So I rooted arounding again in the plumbing box, applied the buffing wheel and came up with the following.

    Picture one shows the whole thing. The main clamping forces come from the two brass threaded pipes at the top.

    If you are wondering what the brass tap handles do, they're still attached to the top part of their respective taps. When you wind them in (ie close the tap) they leverage the bottom part of the verticals out which applies additional force to clamp the blade even tighter at the top (see picture two).

    Picture 3 shows how the saw vice holds a Disston 12. Despite the serious clamping mechanism it's just a tad too sloppy at each end. I'll probably have to use some quick grip clamps at the ends for extra force to keep the blade steady during sharpening.

    For added whimsy I added the tap bottoms to the top threaded pipes to act as turning handles. Just in case you are concerned to see me use brass taps, the valve seats in these taps are pretty well shot, besides I still have a dozen or so taps left in the junk box.

    Cheers

  2. # ADS
    Google Adsense Advertisement
    Join Date
    Always
    Location
    Advertising world
    Posts
    Many





     
  3. #2
    Join Date
    Jul 2005
    Location
    Toowoomba Qld.
    Age
    65
    Posts
    2,792

    Default

    Hi Bob,
    Love it! Good use of old bits and pieces, as usual. I save all sorts of handles and knobs, even off old British car doors, but haven't thought of taps before!
    Regards the sloppiness, it would be a shame to resort to an added (and commercial:eek: ) clamp. My initial response, from the photos, is the boards that face the saw blade need to be further down in their clamping uprights. The top of the uprights should be closer to the teeth of the saw, if you get my drift. Is it possible to allow clearance between the board and upright, so only the top part of the upright effects a clamping action?
    Anyway, that's my 2c, well done anyway!

    Cheers,
    Andy Mac
    Change is inevitable, growth is optional.

  4. #3
    Join Date
    May 2003
    Location
    Kuranda, paradise, North Qld
    Age
    62
    Posts
    5,639

    Default

    Bob,
    would planing a slight hollow in the clamp section at the top maybe increase the clamping force at the ends? (Hopefully without making the middle lose its grip ) BTW, I saw an old saw vice at a garage sale on the weekend, was monted on a ball joint fixture which clamped onto a benchtop, meaning you could adjust the angle of the saw, presumably to get a better working angle. I thought of buying it to see if anyone here wanted it, but thought better of it as I had visions of being landed with another thing I didn't need. It was complete except for the clamping bolt and it had some surface rust but no pitting (that I can remember). All the threads were seized up with rust, but as the rust was light I daresay a bit of electrolysis would sort it out. If you or anyone else is interested I can go back sometime and see if it's still available.

    Mick
    "If you need a machine today and don't buy it,

    tomorrow you will have paid for it and not have it."

    - Henry Ford 1938

  5. #4
    Join Date
    Feb 2006
    Location
    Perth
    Posts
    27,795

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Andy Mac
    Hi Bob,
    Regards the sloppiness, it would be a shame to resort to an added (and commercial:eek: ) clamp. My initial response, from the photos, is the boards that face the saw blade need to be further down in their clamping uprights. The top of the uprights should be closer to the teeth of the saw, if you get my drift. Is it possible to allow clearance between the board and upright, so only the top part of the upright effects a clamping action?
    One of the reasons for the sloppiness is that the clamping boards are made from left over jarrah skirting which has a large angled lengthwise taper (sorry I can't remember the term for this) along the board. Photo 4 shows this reasonably well.

    This means
    a) the ends of each clamping board are relatively thin and so can't grip very much. I can make this thicker by removing 5 - 7 mm off the top of each board.
    b) The verticals or uprights can't be moved upwards without cutting an angled joint into the uprights - this is probably worth doing.

    Cheers

  6. #5
    Join Date
    Feb 2006
    Location
    Perth
    Posts
    27,795

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by journeyman Mick
    Bob,
    would planing a slight hollow in the clamp section at the top maybe increase the clamping force at the ends? (Hopefully without making the middle lose its grip
    Mick I though of this but the clamping boards are already not vertically parallel and only really grip along the top edge. This is because the tap handles at the bottom of the non-fixed side move the clamp out at the bottom, and in turn in at the top. The problem is really only the last 1- 2 horizontal inches of the clamping edge where the vertical width of the clamping board is narrower because of the need to accomodate the saw handles. This narrowing looks overly generous but is needed to accomodate smaller tenon saws.

Similar Threads

  1. Council Recycling Day
    By silentC in forum NON WOODWORK
    Replies: 12
    Last Post: 23rd November 2005, 10:11 PM
  2. Recycling magic
    By Wongo in forum WOODWORK - GENERAL
    Replies: 6
    Last Post: 2nd November 2005, 11:49 AM
  3. Real Recycling
    By Dean in forum WOODWORK - GENERAL
    Replies: 10
    Last Post: 11th March 2005, 11:55 PM

Tags for this Thread

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •