Thread: Is a long post a good post?

As me ol mate Wongo says so righteously "short an sweet"

BUT THEN AGAIN!!

Ive on occasion had occasion to let me mind wander to extrapolate on an intial point made to make understanding clear to all and sundry about the point first made although whilst extrapolating on the first point somewhere it becomes lost within the extrapolations and explainations and so I have to keep wandering around until it comes back..

BUT THEN AGAIN!!!

Ive also on occasion just let me fingers do the talking... sorta put me mind in another place were all you blokes and sheilas are sittin around a table and were yarnin over a few good oils... and well the convo just flows right along

BUT THEN AGAIN!!!

Ive been known to write short and sweet posts from time to time

sorta all depends on me mood as to how much or how little I write... and whether or not I want information or a problem fixed if so its short and sweet preferably with pics... if Im in the mood for a yarn or phissed about something then... well then it has been known to run for a full page!! :eek:

Yes, we've noticed

I think along the lines of those that have already mentioned that depending on what is being put across determines the lenght of the post. Sometimes a few words and a picture are enough other times it is not as it requires more information.


But wait theres more!......:eek: :eek:


Na! I was just joshin'!

savage(Eric)

Dingo, quit drinking mate.

I could possibly get away with the occasional short, concise post of simply "Yes."

But there's always the smartarses who'll point out that a shorter, more concise post would be "No."

Long posts

Schidt me

to tears!