Thanks: 0
Needs Pictures: 0
Picture(s) thanks: 0
Results 16 to 18 of 18
-
15th May 2013, 08:27 AM #16
The old saying is "You Only Get What You Pay For" and while people are happy to keep paying for S**T, that's what they will keep turning out. H&F know that they have the market by the short and curlies so they can keep paying less for sub standard machinery and basically charge what they like for it.
Shane
Still trying to fit a square peg into a round hole.
-
15th May 2013 08:27 AM # ADSGoogle Adsense Advertisement
- Join Date
- Always
- Location
- Advertising world
- Age
- 2010
- Posts
- Many
-
16th May 2013, 11:52 PM #17Senior Member
- Join Date
- Oct 2008
- Location
- Cairns, Q
- Posts
- 351
I completely agree with the sentiments of Grahame and others as typified in the above quote, that you only get what you pay for, and the comment that the Chinese will continue to send us sub standard quality machines because we keep accepting them. However, let's consider the situation if the cheap Chinese tools or something comparable had never become available.
In 1948 my father bought a new 9 x 18 Brackenbury and Austin lathe for 115 pounds ($230). This was considerably cheaper than the slightly larger Hercus. At the time average weekly earnings were seven pounds fifteen shillings and nine pence ($15.58). The B&A lathe came with a faceplate, a chuck backplate (no chuck) and a three step countershaft pulley, but no countershaft, motor or stand, which all had to be bought separately, so it took a person on average weekly earnings 14.8 weeks' wages to buy the basic lathe without accessories. No manual was supplied - it was expected that the buyer would know how to run and maintain a basic small lathe.
In November 2012 average weekly earnings were $1396.00, and the catalogue price of a roughly comparably sized lathe, the AL50GA is presently $1089, complete with standard accessories and stand, for 0.78 weeks' wages. On the basis of the above, if the really cheap Chinese machine tools had not become available, to buy a new lathe of similar capacity, but better than current Chinese quality, about the size of the present AL50G you would now expect to pay around $20660. This does leave a fair margin to spend some money to improve the cheap Chinese tool!
I am no great lover of the present generation of available low-end Chinese machine tools with all their frustrations. However, I'm quite sure that without the availability of these tools, even with all their shortcomings, the prices of the limited number of available surplus commercial machine tools would be much higher because of their scarcity and lack of alternatives. I'm sure I would have been able to afford considerably less new or second hand machining capability than I have now.
Frank.
-
17th May 2013, 09:16 AM #18GOLD MEMBER
- Join Date
- Jul 2006
- Location
- Adelaide
- Posts
- 2,680
the correct manual for the easson dro tuned up in the post yesterday
I guess my verbal tirade of "not good enough" did the trick...if you dont complain nothing gets done
Similar Threads
-
Tom Hare, founder of Hare and Forbes, has died.
By Old farmer in forum WOODWORK - GENERALReplies: 2Last Post: 8th May 2012, 11:52 AM -
Hare and Forbes BP-14A
By damian in forum BANDSAWSReplies: 11Last Post: 18th July 2008, 02:14 PM -
Attention Carbatec KS-12K tablesaw owners
By Big Shed in forum TABLE SAWS & COMBINATIONSReplies: 1Last Post: 18th September 2007, 11:24 PM -
Hare And Forbes St 250 Saw
By K_S in forum TABLE SAWS & COMBINATIONSReplies: 8Last Post: 15th June 2007, 03:38 PM -
Hare & Forbes ST-250 new saw
By ClintO in forum HAND TOOLS - POWEREDReplies: 5Last Post: 27th April 2005, 01:24 AM