Results 1 to 15 of 15
  1. #1
    Join Date
    Oct 2011
    Location
    sydney
    Posts
    880

    Default Dividing Head Chuck

    HI,

    I'm looking at purchasing a Chuck for my Hercus Mill dividing head. Would a 4 jaw chuck or a 3 jaw chuck be better? I can only afford one.

    Ben.

  2. # ADS
    Google Adsense Advertisement
    Join Date
    Always
    Location
    Advertising world
    Posts
    Many





     
  3. #2
    Join Date
    Aug 2008
    Location
    near Rockhampton
    Posts
    4,304

    Default

    A four jaw...

    An ER collet chuck is also very handy..
    Light red, the colour of choice for the discerning man.

  4. #3
    Join Date
    Jul 2012
    Location
    Griffith NSW
    Posts
    257

    Default

    A four jaw can do the work of a three, but the reverse cannot be said. Id go the four too.

  5. #4
    Ueee's Avatar
    Ueee is offline Blacksmith, Cabinetmaker, Machinist, Messmaker
    Join Date
    Dec 2011
    Location
    Canberra
    Age
    40
    Posts
    4,467

    Default

    Another option is to make a spindle nose adapter for it so you can use the chucks off your 260. This also means you can turn something and then take it straight to the mill without removing it from the chuck and loosing concentricity.

    Ew
    1915 17"x50" LeBlond heavy duty Lathe, 24" Queen city shaper, 1970's G Vernier FV.3.TO Universal Mill, 1958 Blohm HFS 6 surface grinder, 1942 Rivett 715 Lathe, 14"x40" Antrac Lathe, Startrite H225 Bandsaw, 1949 Hercus Camelback Drill press, 1947 Holbrook C10 Lathe.

  6. #5
    Join Date
    Nov 2008
    Location
    Perth WA
    Age
    71
    Posts
    5,650

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Ueee View Post
    Another option is to make a spindle nose adapter for it so you can use the chucks off your 260. This also means you can turn something and then take it straight to the mill without removing it from the chuck and loosing concentricity.

    Ew
    Ben will run out of room Ew. Hercus dividing heads are tiny, flimsy things. I tried not disturbing the work in my 5 inch chuck by leaving it in place and moving the chuck over to the DH from the lathe. Turned to syrup when the 2 horsepowered cutter found out that the DH tailstock wasn't tightened. The chuck Hercus supplied as an accessory for the dividing head was a piddly Burnerd scroll thingo. The thing you tighten with a couple of bars. More suited to the mill's 1/2 horsepower.

    Bob.

  7. #6
    Join Date
    Mar 2011
    Location
    Dural NSW
    Age
    82
    Posts
    1,120

    Default Yes

    Quote Originally Posted by Anorak Bob View Post
    Mike will run out of room Ew. Hercus dividing heads are tiny, flimsy things. I tried not disturbing the work in my 5 inch chuck by leaving it in place and moving the chuck over to the DH from the lathe. Turned to syrup when the 2 horsepowered cutter found out that the DH tailstock wasn't tightened. The chuck Hercus supplied as an accessory for the dividing head was a piddly Burnerd scroll thingo. The thing you tighten with a couple of bars. More suited to the mill's 1/2 horsepower.

    Bob.


    edit . My 2 bob's worth on the 3, 4 jaw thing. I have a 4 inch four jaw that I have used a number of times on the lathe but never on the Hercus dividing head. I have an 80mm Griptru 3 Jaw that I've used on the lathe and on the Hercus mill but it's a pain in the ring piece to adjust. The other mill has a 3 jaw 4 inch chuck that fits that mill's dividing head. I would need to make a backing plate to enable one of my other 4 inch four jaws to fit that dividing head and that's a bit of a challenge.

    Stuart once said that the best you could really hope for on a mill would be a thou tolerance. That's stuck with me and that's probably why I haven't got around to another backing plate.
    Agree with Bob on this, a large chuck will be too restrictive
    Please see my note today in the "E Bay Metalworking Stuff" section of this Forum.
    regards
    Bruce

  8. #7
    Join Date
    Nov 2008
    Location
    Perth WA
    Age
    71
    Posts
    5,650

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Ueee View Post
    Another option is to make a spindle nose adapter for it so you can use the chucks off your 260. This also means you can turn something and then take it straight to the mill without removing it from the chuck and loosing concentricity.

    Ew
    Another way to achieve chuck interchangeability might be to mount the new chuck on a 3 Morse arbor. The DH is bored 3, the 250, 4. An adaptor sleeve would facilitate the interchange. Hercus sold a 3 Morse arbor with a 1 3/4" threaded nose as an accessory ( part no. 5H1067 ) for the milling slide's indexing attachment. That arbor will fit the DH. If the dividing head's spindle nose is fitted with a nose protection ring, the ring can be used to eject the arbor. Gently.

    I bought one of the 1 3/4 adaptors from Hercus and cut off the thread, rethreading it 1 1/2 x 8 to suit my chucks.

    The downside of this suggestion is that the ability to hold long workpieces through the chuck and spindle bore is lost. The dividing head will also accommodate 3C collets. Bruce uses some import 3Cs and swears by them. They run out of puff at 1/2".

    BT

  9. #8
    Join Date
    Oct 2011
    Location
    sydney
    Posts
    880

    Default

    Hi,

    Thanks for the replies. I did forget to ask what size chuck. Tissuescars has a couple of 6 diam chucks but after Abratools post may be to big. I'll continue searching.

    Thanks Ben.

  10. #9
    Join Date
    Oct 2011
    Location
    sydney
    Posts
    880

  11. #10
    Join Date
    Oct 2011
    Location
    Adelaide
    Age
    59
    Posts
    3,149

    Default

    Personally I would suggest for a first chuck that a 3 jaw would be better - the reason being that they are self centering. A 4 jaw would mean having to rotate the chuck a few times on the dividing head to get things trued up. A pain if you just want to do a quick cross drilled hole or two. It does not need to be big - 100mm or even 80mm would probably do
    The other point is minor but a 3 jaw will hold round stock and hex stock where as the 4 jaw will do round and square stock. Is that a consideration?

    Michael

  12. #11
    Join Date
    Nov 2008
    Location
    Perth WA
    Age
    71
    Posts
    5,650

    Default My Sincere Apology Ben

    Hello Ben,

    In my reply to Ewan's post I called you Mike. Now, I did proof read that reply before I posted it and I could try to blame the red wine or my age or both but I can't. I made an mistake for which I am truly sorry.

    Bob.

  13. #12
    Join Date
    Oct 2011
    Location
    sydney
    Posts
    880

    Default

    HI Bob,

    No problems at all. You wouldn't believe how many times I pull out my dictionary to check my spelling. Or how many times I forget people's names.

    Ben.

    I'm going to have a look at a few of the local markets over the next couple of weeks to see what turns up chuck wise.

  14. #13
    Join Date
    Nov 2008
    Location
    Perth WA
    Age
    71
    Posts
    5,650

    Default

    Thank you Ben.

    I did post a bunch of photos last night of various chucks and how they would or would not fit the little Hercus, then deleted them for which I will blame the plonk.

    Here they are again. The 6 inch light pattern 4 jaw Burnerd and their 5 inch 3, both supplied by Hercus for the nine inch lathe, won't fit because the base bracket casting gets in the way. The 4 x 4 fits nicely as would the little scroll chuck which is just perched on the nose for the purpose of the photo. I wouldn't go larger than a four inch chuck. I did mount my backplate fitted 5 inch TOS on the little head for some milling on the 13. Came unstuck because I had not tightened the tailstock and that setup needed tailstock support.
    Attached Images Attached Images

  15. #14
    Join Date
    Oct 2011
    Location
    sydney
    Posts
    880

    Default

    Hi,

    Bought a Bernard chuck of epay, a little 4 incher. It's made for a Myford lathe, with a screw on thread. I was hoping to be able to put a backing plate on like this:

    http://australianmetalworkinghobbyis...product_id=194

    But I'm not so sure if I can do that now as there's no actual backing plate already on the chuck.

    I think I still can, any suggestions?

    Ben
    Attached Images Attached Images

  16. #15
    Join Date
    Jun 2007
    Location
    sydney
    Age
    64
    Posts
    3,566

    Default

    If the thread in the chuck is an integral part of the chuck I wouldn't be trying to adapt another back-plate to it.

    It could probably be done but a lot of work/mucking around may be.

    You would in my opinion be better off making up an adapter socket.

Similar Threads

  1. The thread of the font of the dividing head
    By Michael G in forum METALWORK FORUM
    Replies: 2
    Last Post: 7th September 2013, 10:37 PM
  2. dividing plates, dividing head
    By eskimo in forum METALWORK FORUM
    Replies: 22
    Last Post: 4th August 2012, 06:17 PM
  3. Hercus Dividing Head
    By Anorak Bob in forum METALWORK FORUM
    Replies: 9
    Last Post: 3rd January 2011, 09:20 PM
  4. dividing head
    By tanii51 in forum METALWORK FORUM
    Replies: 9
    Last Post: 18th October 2010, 09:32 AM
  5. Lathe dividing head attachment
    By jamie_c in forum METALWORK FORUM
    Replies: 2
    Last Post: 31st July 2010, 07:42 PM

Tags for this Thread

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •