Thanks: 0
Needs Pictures: 0
Picture(s) thanks: 0
Results 1 to 12 of 12
-
28th July 2013, 02:21 AM #1.
- Join Date
- Nov 2008
- Location
- Perth WA
- Age
- 71
- Posts
- 5,650
DTI Repeatability- A question to other users.
I was fiddling around with the newly acquired Hommel height mic, some gauge blocks and my tenth DTI this morning. I was trying to check the accuracy of the Hommel against the blocks. The DTI was mounted on a height vernier and zeroed on the blocks. The DTI was then moved over to the height micrometer and its most appropriately positioned ring raised until the DTI was indicating zero. The Hommel indicated zero at the exact same position.
When I repositioned the stylus of the DTI on the 50mm high stack of blocks again, it read 0.0007" beyond zero, 50mm + 0.00007". To zero the DTI on the blocks I used the height vernier's fine adjustment to lower the stylus onto the blocks. The same gentle pushing upwards of the stylus applies to the action of the height mic. When the stylus was again repositioned on the blocks the movement was abrupt. It rides up and over the edge of the block. Whilst the vertical movement was no more than half a thou it appears to jar the indicator out of whack by a bit over half a tenth. I only have one 0.0001" dial test indicator. I can't make any comparisons.
Has any one else encountered a similar occurrence when moving a DTI's stylus off and then back on an object?
Bob
-
28th July 2013 02:21 AM # ADSGoogle Adsense Advertisement
- Join Date
- Always
- Location
- Advertising world
- Age
- 2010
- Posts
- Many
-
28th July 2013, 04:53 AM #2Philomath in training
- Join Date
- Oct 2011
- Location
- Adelaide
- Age
- 59
- Posts
- 3,149
Normally I put that sort of thing down to being caccy handed or things not being mounted rigidly enough. I think I have a tenth indicator somewhere - would you like me to send it over next week so you can compare?
I've just finished up a week here at "head office" and talked to the guys that do the calibration here. To do DTI & DIs they mount it in a really rigid stand and using a large calibrated micrometer head wind the plungers up and down. The interesting thing was that I was told the error is plotted for the various readings. At the end of it they can tell by the period of any errors on the plot which of the 3 gears inside the indicator is worn. I'd never thought of interpreting errors that way.
Michael
-
28th July 2013, 05:19 AM #3GOLD MEMBER
- Join Date
- Aug 2007
- Location
- Saskatoon, SK, Canada.
- Posts
- 1,439
Try the same again with your gauge blocks against the height micrometer to minimize the drop between the two. The indicators have less of a tendency to jump if you drag the tip onto the blocks etc., from under the indicator rather than push towards it or from the side.
One other thing to mention. If you want to maintain the faces of your gauge blocks when working on a granite surface plate you should always use a "wear block" on the granite. It is one block, .0500" or .1000", 1mm or 2mm for eg., in the set that is always on the bottom of the stack with the same face against the granite and the good side up. That way the rest of the blocks don't get scratched and will wring together easily. If you choose not to use a wear block it doesn't take long before the rest of the set get scratched and they in turn scratch others when wrung together.
Pete
-
28th July 2013, 06:28 AM #4Intermediate Member
- Join Date
- Apr 2013
- Location
- San Diego
- Posts
- 31
Your indicator point "appears" to be pointing down in relation to the granite plate. The ideal position is to be parallel or pointing slightly up. The velocity at which you move the indicator also has some effect on the reading.
Gene
-
28th July 2013, 08:13 AM #5Pink 10EE owner
- Join Date
- Aug 2008
- Location
- near Rockhampton
- Posts
- 4,304
My experience with 0.01mm DTI's when used like that is when I move the dti forward onto the workpiece, slide it over, then bring it back I get a 0.01mm different reading..
I think consistency is the key to repeatability...Light red, the colour of choice for the discerning man.
-
28th July 2013, 10:30 AM #6SENIOR MEMBER
- Join Date
- Jun 2012
- Location
- SA
- Posts
- 1,478
What happens repeatability wise if you leave the stylus on the blocks, zero it, and then carefully lift and return the stylus with a pin or scribe?
Rob
-
28th July 2013, 10:34 AM #7.
- Join Date
- Nov 2008
- Location
- Perth WA
- Age
- 71
- Posts
- 5,650
Michael, Pete, Gene and Richard,
Thank you for your replies. Yesterday was the first time I've used the gauge blocks. I will keep in mind the "wear block" and its importance. I'll head back up to the shed and try a couple of different mounting options being mindful of the angle of approach. The DTI could be 40 years old and though it looks to be in good nick, wear may play its hand in the outcome of the readings. It's interesting to find that RC's indicator performs in the same fashion.
Michael, if it's not too much of a pain in the neck to send me your tenth DTI (if you can find it ) I'd greatly appreciate it. I have a couple of 0.005" dial test indicators but half a thou is a bit rubbery for this application.
Bob.
-
28th July 2013, 11:27 AM #8.
- Join Date
- Nov 2008
- Location
- Perth WA
- Age
- 71
- Posts
- 5,650
I'll give it a go Rob. I've noticed that when traversing something while attempting to set it parallel, the DTI will read differently when the traverse is reversed. Only a whisker, maybe a tenth. Could be wear or it could be just the nature of the mechanism. Even happens with my box fresh Compac dial indicator and the 1um Mahr Millimess. As RC suggests, if it happens consistently its probably not a problem.
Bob.
-
28th July 2013, 11:47 AM #9
Hi BT,
I always find that it is better to move the object being measured rather then the indicator. This also means that you are using the same spot on the rock to compare off, which with the little carbatec ones is a good idea, as i don't think they are as flat as the report says. (mine certainly is not as flat as the "tombstone"-that what SWMBO calls it)
Stu and i bought some comparator stands earlier this year with the plan of making some super rigid holders from them. Maybe something else to keep an eye out for? https://www.woodworkforums.com/f65/to...ml#post1627877
Cheers,
Ew1915 17"x50" LeBlond heavy duty Lathe, 24" Queen city shaper, 1970's G Vernier FV.3.TO Universal Mill, 1958 Blohm HFS 6 surface grinder, 1942 Rivett 715 Lathe, 14"x40" Antrac Lathe, Startrite H225 Bandsaw, 1949 Hercus Camelback Drill press, 1947 Holbrook C10 Lathe.
-
28th July 2013, 01:40 PM #10SENIOR MEMBER
- Join Date
- Jun 2012
- Location
- SA
- Posts
- 1,478
I did the same with my cheap CTC DTI this morning. I set it up and then lifted the ball tip with a feeler gauge within the readable range and then returned it.
The repeatability was EXCELLENT. Pretty amazing for such a cheap DTI.
However, I found that there was a very slight difference between lowering the tip back slowly and letting it slam back - slight, and not as bad as you're getting, but there.
So I recon you might have a case of stiction, where the inertia of the tip is having an effect on the reading point. Maybe the oil is a bit sticky in the unit.
Cheers
Rob
-
28th July 2013, 02:10 PM #11
Hi BT,
What you are seeing when the movement reverses is just the hysteresis in the DTI, check the DTI specs and see if it's within the tolerances specified. With a little care in how you move the tip you can minimize the error and provide more consistency in the results.
When you are at the 1 um level, you need to have super rigid mounting, and hold you tongue just right for every measurement. don't forget for a 50 mm high (steel) stack will change 0.65 um per degree C..
Don't forget to dust carefully....particles of dust that are visible in a shaft of light are approximately 50 microns. The eye can see dust particles down to 10um, I found it interesting that you can "feel" dust on a surface plate at much smaller sizes than you can see..
Regards
Ray
-
29th July 2013, 11:48 AM #12GOLD MEMBER
- Join Date
- Mar 2011
- Location
- Dural NSW
- Age
- 82
- Posts
- 1,120
Granite Surface Plates
Pete
Thanks for this helpful information.
I am somewhat of the "old school" & although I have a Granite Surface Plate have not used it for setting up using gauge blocks.
Did not realise the granite might cause scratching of the blocks.
I have hand scraped a couple of Cast Iron surface plates using the granite as the master.
So will continue to use the cast iron plates for any precise use, with gauge blocks, to avoid the scratching problem you mentioned, or if need be, use the .050" gauge block as you have outlined.
I found this hint very helpful, thanks again.
regards
Bruce
Similar Threads
-
Taster, Arbors and Repeatability
By Anorak Bob in forum METALWORK FORUMReplies: 43Last Post: 16th June 2013, 11:21 AM -
Question For Gifkin Jig Users...
By Boxinator in forum BOX MAKINGReplies: 8Last Post: 9th January 2007, 05:20 PM -
A question for all you ML-392 users.
By outback in forum HAND TOOLS - POWEREDReplies: 5Last Post: 27th December 2006, 11:05 PM