Thanks: 0
Likes: 0
Needs Pictures: 0
Picture(s) thanks: 0
Results 16 to 25 of 25
Thread: All in the eye of the beholder.
-
17th March 2012, 07:30 PM #16
I did a fair bit of technical studies in high school as the school I went to was classed as a technical high school the year before I started. The SA govt decided to drop the "technical" name and idea at that time. I did metalwork, sheetmetal work (Maybe), wood work, plastics and applied electricity. I remenber there being quite a bit of abenteeism at that time due to health for some reason so I missed out on quite a bit but have always been glad of the starter knowledge received.
I can understand what you are saying as I was always the one trying to learn while the disruptive elements were doing their best to, well disrupt. I currently work in the wine industry and understand from this that everything these days is based on safety even tho the rules etc may not be the best for safety sake.
As an example there has been suggetions that workers should wear safety glasses at all times just to protect against the risk of eye injury from wind blown sources. The Head of maintenance was doing this for some time but no one took any notice. Good thing as this does not work.
This is totally stupid and a waste of time. Safety glasses are designed to prevent impact damage and have no capacity to prevent wind blown dust etc from entering the eyes.
There is a shortage of trades people and the lack of pre-vocation training is not helping. I do not see any workable answer to this problem either. Kids these days are not brought up to expect a trade type of career although I read an article recently which commented on the chance that a young person who does an apprentiship and starts a business has the chance to make very good money long before uni graduates have paid off their loan and acheived any success.
Dean
-
17th March 2012 07:30 PM # ADSGoogle Adsense Advertisement
- Join Date
- Always
- Location
- Advertising world
- Age
- 2010
- Posts
- Many
-
17th March 2012, 07:45 PM #17
I can only wholeheartedly agree with this sentiment. I also read your next post and ditto for that one as well. No wonder schools do not have these dangerous subjects anymore.
On another subject I am a registered firearms owner. If I talk to people at work etc about this subject they are usually totally misinformed about the ownership of firearms and have the opinion that anyone who owns such are maniacs. The power of the press which has managed to convince the mainstream population that most of firearms based crimes are caused by legal licensed firearms holders.
I see the same bias towards many aspects of society today. The real truth is something that does not get a look in anymore.
Dean
-
17th March 2012, 10:21 PM #18Senior Member
- Join Date
- Apr 2010
- Location
- Rural Victoria
- Posts
- 359
I also partake in target shooting.. haven't gone hunting for a long time, and then I'd probably only shoot an animal if I was hungry or they were being a nuisance. I also receive the same negative brainwashed reaction from a majority of persons I speak to regarding these sporting activities. 'Guns kill people'... 'why do you need a gun?'... 'intelligent people don't need guns'... blah blah blah blah blah.....
Every year, motor vehicles kill many hundreds more people than legally owned firearms, yet the media stigmatisation of legally owned firearms is many thousands times higher, and it is getting relatively easier to get a driver's licence than it was a decade ago.
Which just goes to show... many people are easily fooled.
My kids will grow up respecting devices which will potentially maim and kill them. My machine tools will teach them that you need to put a lot in, pay a lot of attention, otherwise things will go wrong with serious results. It's not like playing Halo or Medal of Honor on your Xbox, pressing reset and you get another three lives...
A few years ago I was sanding some Tas oak floorboards with my belt sander. Three year old boy was hanging around, who I told to not touch the sander because I had to leave the room to answer the telephone or something. Very soon came the sound of belt sander being operated briefly. I reenter the room, three year old boy is now white as a sheet, his eyes are like saucers, and there is a 4" wide graze over the top of his bare foot. I didn't need to say anything. Boy is now seven, watches me takes off rust with Metabo 5" grinder with cup brush and he wants a turn... but now he respects that I tell him he is too young, but I will show him how to do it when he's old enough.
I had him welding when he was four. This has shocked a few people, particularly some of my female friends. He had all the correct PPE, Speedglas helmet, my heavy welding jacket and my leather gauntlets which came up to armpits, and he could barely lift the mig gun. He made a few welds that looked like the usual cocky guano, and he loved it.
Much better playing with the reality and consequences of machinery rather than the virtual reality and no consequences of violent shoot'em up games like Halo where you fire automatic weapons into the enemy's head and it explodes in a spray of blood and chunks. So much safer than letting your four-year-old having a supervised blast of your welder....
So yes, my workshop will also be their classroom, if they are interested, and I strongly suspect they are.
-
17th March 2012, 11:43 PM #19.
- Join Date
- Nov 2008
- Location
- Perth WA
- Age
- 71
- Posts
- 5,650
I've been in the shed all afternoon laboriously boring a hole in a bit of bar hence the late response.
So...You reckon I'd tell you if I found one going cheap??
That 135 is a late sixties model. The PM aficionados reckon the Hardinge HLV-H is a better machine but I have a strong attraction to the Swiss. Slim chance of owning either in reality but yearning isn't a sin.
BT
-
18th March 2012, 12:22 AM #20.
- Join Date
- Nov 2008
- Location
- Perth WA
- Age
- 71
- Posts
- 5,650
Hey, OT but ...... Do they still have cadets at high school?
Way back in '67 ,at the age of 15, I was a member of the Hollywood High School Cadet Rifle Team. I can recall the sight of the smaller kids sliding backwards from the recoil of the .303s we used at Swanbourne rifle range, and the sore and bruised shoulders. We fired live rounds from Bren light machine guns and Owen sub machine guns. Fired dummy rounds from a 3 inch mortar. Missed out on firing the L1A1. They were being used in Vietnam . We had an SAS sergeant show and strip one but that was as close as we got. I have no recollection of any of us fooling around with those weapons. Cadets at my school was voluntary. Corporal punishment was the norm. I fooled around in both wood and metalwork and got belted. I didn't tell my parents.
Haven't times changed.
BT
-
18th March 2012, 02:09 AM #21Senior Member
- Join Date
- Apr 2010
- Location
- Rural Victoria
- Posts
- 359
Oh yeah!
I believe some schools still have cadets but they are few and far between.
Many of the 'civilian' target shooting clubs, even into the 1980's, were off-shoots of the Defense Department, the idea being that competition would be good training for future soldiers should the need arise.
Now you need to be a brain surgeon or rocket scientist to get into the army.
It is assumed that no-one will invade your country because politicians can bullsh#t their way out of an invasion.
However, if they do, today's youth can point their X-box controller at them and press the 'reset' button, and they'll get three more lives!!!
Compare Australia to countries like Switzerland in which all males are conscripted and soldiers keep their assault rifles at home. Is it any wonder why Switzerland has remained neutral?
I would favour a return to National Service for young Australians... on the strict proviso that they would not be the meat that tested weapons in Iraq, Afghanistan or some other US manufactured theatre of war designed to sustain the US armaments industry.
Despite the hype, Afghanistan or Iraq did not threaten our immediate survival. Yes, September 11, 2001 was bad, but then again the Luftwaffe bombed the crap out of London for 7 months straight. America could have levelled both Baghdad and Kabul in a day with conventional weapons, and not one US, British or Australian grunt had to die.
I think that the overwhelming reason that today's youth is weak is because their leaders are weak. They lie, they steal, they cheat,they worm out of obligations - they have no integrity. Their leaders during the 'War on Terrorism' were George Bush Jr, Tony Blair, John Howard, not Winston Churchill, Theodore Roosevelt, or Robert Menzies. Things have gone downhill with the current leadership of this country. There is huge rhetoric, and nothing happens. Like a rat in a Skinner box, if nothing happens, they soon stop tapping the key.
As you say, times have changed.
-
18th March 2012, 10:49 AM #22
a '36 (?) Cord Phaeton...
Greg, now I am drooling.
-
18th March 2012, 03:44 PM #23SENIOR MEMBER
- Join Date
- Jun 2011
- Location
- Australia east coast
- Age
- 71
- Posts
- 1,469
My standard answer to that runs along the lines of 'I have an undergrad and 2 postgrad degrees. I've designed systems that hold a lot of medical data on over 67% of children born in this country. I've personally built 3 houses and can get by in carpentry, metalwork and IT. I own & like to shoot firearms. If that makes me stupid, what are you and what have you, personally, achieved?'
Usually they change the subject.
WRT Greg's comments, if I got caught today doing some of the things I didn't get caught doing when I was a teenager, I'd be in jail on terrorist charges. The only real difference between myself and a few of my compatriots is, I went to university and they went to Long Bay.
I still have the castings (and the patterns to make more) for a half sized Napoleon 12 pound field gun and an 1806 6 pounder naval cannon. They're garden ornaments at present.
PDW
-
18th March 2012, 09:02 PM #24Senior Member
- Join Date
- Apr 2010
- Location
- Rural Victoria
- Posts
- 359
I got into trouble at work once because I threw a little bit of dry ice (I was working in food transport at the time) in the bottom of a plastic coke bottle, poured in a little bit of water, did the cap up tight and threw it out into the middle of the yard, not near anyone. One smart #### bludger agency casual walks up to it and kicks it. The extra agitation sped up the reaction and it exploded. This little trick is quite safe as the most that can happen is that someone can be startled by the loud noise.
Next day it was reported to the manager and I received a verbal warning about endangering fellow workers and OHS issues. This coming from a workplace where the fire extinguishers were 8 years out of date.
The day after I told the dobber to f@&# off because he was driving his new bomb to work on a temporary permit which is illegal. He was not allowed to drive it after 7pm and the shift ended at 10pm. So at 6pm I gave him a choice: leave now and I'll report you to your agency for abandoning your posting, or if you finish the shift at 10pm I'll have the police waiting at the gate. I knew he was a heavy dope smoker, all I had to do was appeal to his paranoia.
Two take home lessons:
1) People in glass houses shouldn't throw stones
2) Truth is a relative concept
OT- yes. Is the Aussie larrikin dead? NO!
-
18th March 2012, 09:09 PM #25Senior Member
- Join Date
- Apr 2010
- Location
- Rural Victoria
- Posts
- 359
New thread required (if it doesn't exist already) "BEST EVER WORKPLACE OR OTHER PRANKS" to stop this unashamed hijacking of this thread...