Thanks: 0
Needs Pictures: 0
Picture(s) thanks: 0
Results 16 to 30 of 78
Thread: Imperial vs Metric system
-
23rd November 2013, 01:23 PM #16
The Imperial system was based on 4 not 12. 4 x 2 pints = 1 gallon, 4 x 3 inches = 1 foot, 4 x 4 ounces = 1 pound etc (but 3 feet to the yard is one of the exceptions that prove the rule.) A dozen items pack into a neater looking box than ten.
Easy for people but cash registers and calculators have a harder time.
My tuppence worthHugh
Enough is enough, more than enough is too much.
-
23rd November 2013 01:23 PM # ADSGoogle Adsense Advertisement
- Join Date
- Always
- Location
- Advertising world
- Age
- 2010
- Posts
- Many
-
23rd November 2013, 01:30 PM #17Senior Member
- Join Date
- Jul 2012
- Location
- Griffith NSW
- Posts
- 257
The coherance of the metric system is its biggest appeal to me. Doing away with imperial units means you in turn do away with a mountain of conversion factors. Makes doing a lot of calculations much more straight forward.
-
23rd November 2013, 02:10 PM #18Mechanical Butcher
- Join Date
- Oct 2004
- Location
- Southern Highlands NSW
- Posts
- 920
Doing away with? !
I'll have to hide my imperial stuff from the likes of you.
Jordan
-
23rd November 2013, 02:39 PM #19
-
23rd November 2013, 03:24 PM #20
-
23rd November 2013, 03:43 PM #21
But if you say 1.375 inches.
An american is going to ask you what the hell it means??
Even after explaining what it means they still get stuck,
they want it as 1 3/8 inch.
-
23rd November 2013, 04:00 PM #22
Of course you lot have been spared the Cape CWT and Cape foot used in the Southern African colonies.
Hugh
Enough is enough, more than enough is too much.
-
23rd November 2013, 04:21 PM #23Senior Member
- Join Date
- Apr 2010
- Location
- ringwood vic
- Posts
- 251
G'Day Fellas,
I have always thought the imperial system was perfect for inbred hillbillys with six fingers on each hand, which may explain why our American cousins are so determined to hang on to it,
Regards,
Martin
-
23rd November 2013, 04:54 PM #24Intermediate Member
- Join Date
- Sep 2013
- Location
- Adelaide
- Posts
- 32
The maths of the imperial system were based on magic numbers.
12 is divisible by 1, 2, 3, 4, 6 - good if you need to share a dozen widegts with your mates.
36, 60, 144, 360 also have numerous factors.
So we have 60 seconds in a minute and 60 minutes in an hour.
360 degrees in a circle
etc...
-
23rd November 2013, 05:09 PM #25
Does anyone else remember when Current Affair tried the april fool joke that soon we would go to decimal time.
100 seconds, 100 minutes and 20 hours per day.
-
23rd November 2013, 05:24 PM #26GOLD MEMBER
- Join Date
- Jul 2006
- Location
- Port Huon
- Posts
- 2,685
-
23rd November 2013, 06:00 PM #271915 17"x50" LeBlond heavy duty Lathe, 24" Queen city shaper, 1970's G Vernier FV.3.TO Universal Mill, 1958 Blohm HFS 6 surface grinder, 1942 Rivett 715 Lathe, 14"x40" Antrac Lathe, Startrite H225 Bandsaw, 1949 Hercus Camelback Drill press, 1947 Holbrook C10 Lathe.
-
23rd November 2013, 06:07 PM #28
-
23rd November 2013, 06:18 PM #29
-
23rd November 2013, 06:28 PM #30Cba
- Join Date
- Aug 2007
- Location
- Melbourne
- Age
- 68
- Posts
- 1,417
> Does anyone know which system came first?
About 200 years ago, every country still had its own "imperial" system. Even countries like Switzerland, that otherwise did away with anything "imperial" like kings and emperors already some 800 years ago. Every language had another name for "inch". Pousse in French, Zoll in German, Pollice in Italy, etc etc. And the exact length of each "inch" was subtly different in each country. The inch is defined as the length of an average human thumb tip. Not a very accurate or stable definition. It was a big mess.
Then Mr N. Buonaparte forcefully introduced the meter, based on a metal standard. Initially nobody wanted or needed yet another measuring system. But the advantages were undeniable, and most countries worldwide converted during the 19th century (eg 1800 to 1900) to the metric system. With the exception of the UK and their former colonies. But during the 20th century even these have converted to the meter. Leaving today in the 21st century only the USA still firmly stuck with the imperial system. Funny enough, even the US are officially a metric country since well over 100 years - they just never seriously undertook to legislate and implement the transition. Still, I believe it is safe to say that in a generation (or about 25 years time) even the Americans will have completed their transition to the meter.
Hey, who really cares? It is not too hard to work in either system. For home shop users, it mens lots of good obsolete imperial tools become available for cheap.
Similar Threads
-
Metric Vs Imperial
By Peter G in forum WOODWORK - GENERALReplies: 127Last Post: 9th June 2019, 11:11 PM -
leigh d4r imperial / metric?........
By singastorm in forum HOMEMADE TOOLS AND JIGS ETC.Replies: 2Last Post: 3rd September 2013, 10:07 AM -
260 metric to imperial chart
By tanii51 in forum THE HERCUS AREAReplies: 3Last Post: 2nd June 2010, 02:50 PM -
Metric Jig, Imperial Bits?
By M-R in forum INCRA JIGSReplies: 3Last Post: 30th December 2007, 08:16 PM -
Metric or Imperial?
By derekcohen in forum HAND TOOLS - UNPOWEREDReplies: 55Last Post: 24th May 2004, 04:34 PM