Thanks Thanks:  0
Likes Likes:  0
Needs Pictures Needs Pictures:  0
Picture(s) thanks Picture(s) thanks:  0
Page 3 of 3 FirstFirst 123
Results 31 to 36 of 36
  1. #31
    Join Date
    Oct 2008
    Location
    Cairns, Q
    Posts
    351

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by .RC. View Post
    I do not think there is such a taper as a 4 1/2 morse.. It is an American taper as shown here

    Shop reference for students and ... - Google Books
    .RC.

    A Google search comes up with several references to the 4 1/2 morse taper:

    Google

    There is quite a bit of discussion of 4 1/2 morse tapers in a thread started by Boss429 on PM (General) on 6-19-2007 which also gives MH page number references and taper dimensions. Quoted dimensions were:

    "MT 4 1/2 small=1.266 inch, large=1.500 inch, taper=.62400 in/ft
    MT 5 small=1.475 inch, large=1.748 inch, taper=.63151 in/ft"

    Some of the lathes said to have had a 4 1/2 MT headstock are: Hendey 14", some South Bends, some Clausings including the 5900s, some Sebastians, and 11" Rockwells. I seem to remember reading that some of the Chinese or Taiwanese lathes a few years ago also had 4 1/2 morse headstocks, but cannot remember any names or models.

    Apparently the size was introduced because it was the smallest morse taper that could accommodate a 5C collet adapter.There really does seem to be a fair amount of evidence that this was a recognised taper.

    franco

  2. # ADS
    Google Adsense Advertisement
    Join Date
    Always
    Location
    Advertising world
    Posts
    Many





     
  3. #32
    Join Date
    May 2010
    Location
    Lower Lakes SA
    Age
    59
    Posts
    2,557

    Default

    Dave J, the whole taper is only 40mm long. It doesn't really have a middle to remove! Pipeclay, don't take it personally, but I want to try again to verify what I actually have. I'm scheming to reverse-engineer the method outlined in Woodlee's link. Graziano, that would stick out a fair bit. Could still work though, if the small end is no bigger than about 35. Originally I made mine stick out enough so the tip was flush with the face of the chuck so I could drive off a jaw. Now it's so, um, minimal, I'll have to use the faceplate.

  4. #33
    Join Date
    Jun 2007
    Location
    sydney
    Age
    65
    Posts
    3,566

    Default

    Im not upset at all,just thought you might like to know what the taper/inch was so you could set your compound without having to jam something in your spindle.
    Last edited by pipeclay; 1st July 2010 at 02:04 PM. Reason: wrong dimension

  5. #34
    Join Date
    May 2010
    Location
    Lower Lakes SA
    Age
    59
    Posts
    2,557

    Default

    Yep, that's great info, thanks pipeclay. But I'll just try to confirm by measurement that's all. Been busy with other stuff today.

  6. #35
    Join Date
    May 2010
    Location
    Lower Lakes SA
    Age
    59
    Posts
    2,557

    Default Eccentricities (long-winded)

    I've spent some time on this over the last few days and I feel I've made some progress, though not as much as I'd like. For those who came in late, I'm attempting to reproduce the taper in my lathe's spindle. It's a size that's hard to find (MT 4.5?). I want to be able to make adaptors to fit various standard tooling. It's become an exercise in error-chasing, and a great learning process.

    So I made a plug gauge, with one end fixed (press fit) to a shaft, and the other, exactly one mm larger in diameter, a sliding fit. The idea being to fit this snugly into the taper, mount between centres and set the compound slide from it. Here's a picture of my first attempt to do this.

    https://www.woodworkforums.com/attach...1&d=1280832135

    And my purpose-built, centre-height indicator holder (not a machined surface on it )

    https://www.woodworkforums.com/attach...1&d=1280832135

    I used a toolbit as a parallel to run the indicator on. You can see it's only contacting the leading edges of the two diameters. Yes they are rubber bands, and yes, that is a knurl. So I got it dialled spot-on, and cut a taper.

    https://www.woodworkforums.com/attach...1&d=1280832292

    The result was not flash. Bluing showed all the contact at the small end, and there was a bit of runout too. Closer examination of my plug gauge revealed the small end had a lot of runout, which I still can't really explain. The part was turned at one setting and should have been concentric.

    I fudged it by setting it at the average position. This time I ditched the toolbit and just got the indicator riding on the very corner (easy to do actually), pulled the stem back, wound the compound along, and found the same sweet spot on the larger diameter. Again, got it spot on, took another cut.

    Here are 2 pics of the blue reading:

    https://www.woodworkforums.com/attach...2&d=1280832129

    https://www.woodworkforums.com/attach...3&d=1280832129

    Not a bad contact area I thought. What's interesting is in the second pic you can see the contact reduces. I got this by rotating the workpiece a full turn, BTW. You may just see a texta dot at the lower left of the workpiece. That marks one of the high points. There are two, about 90 deg apart.

    Total indicator readings were .01 at the small end, nearer to .05 at the big end. I took these readings by mounting the piece lightly between centres and turning it by hand, so spindle error was eliminated. I tried it with the part reversed to eliminate my cheap live centre. Same result. Negligible runout at the small end; two oddly spaced lumps on the big end, always at the same spots.

    https://www.woodworkforums.com/attach...4&d=1280832129

    https://www.woodworkforums.com/attach...5&d=1280832129

    Now, I can think of a better way to set the compound: Use a lever type indicator mounted in the toolpost to read directly from the taper. I don't have such an indicator but I think I may very soon (Anyone have one to sell before I get an ebay cheapie? ) However. I don't think the angle is the problem. I think I'm cutting lumpy circles and I don't know why. That's as far as I've got.

    Thanks for reading this far. Any thoughts?

  7. #36
    Dave J Guest

    Default

    Hi Bryan looks like you have been busy, I hope your wife has recovered and is ok

    The cheaper dial test indicators work fine, as there not for measuring only comparing. I would recommend you get a micron indicator, especially for this job as you will see more movement in the needle for the same amount, compared a 0.01mm one.
    It could be some of your problems at the moment.

    Here is a reasonably priced one, he is also on ebay if that suits you but he is a bit dearer on there.
    MICRON DIAL TEST INDICATOR #D11

    I bought one of his 0.01 test indicators in the link below that come with the small mag base for general use, to save using my more precision and expensive ones. The mag base is useless but the test indicator works fine. Mine has Mitutoyo printed on it, but it is only a copy.
    DIAL TEST INDICATOR WITH MAGNETIC BASE #C91

    If you have a bit of time there are good quality ones that you can get on ebay for good prices. I have picked up a Mitutoyo 0.001mm indicator for around $35 and Girod test indicator for about $59 etc.

    Dave

Page 3 of 3 FirstFirst 123

Similar Threads

  1. Dead Centre Size for Hercus Spindle
    By wannabe in forum THE HERCUS AREA
    Replies: 7
    Last Post: 13th November 2009, 09:52 AM
  2. centre for spindle bore
    By ausdag in forum THE HERCUS AREA
    Replies: 4
    Last Post: 15th September 2009, 10:36 PM
  3. Drive centre for vertical lathe
    By jmk89 in forum WOODTURNING - GENERAL
    Replies: 8
    Last Post: 5th July 2008, 09:00 AM
  4. Anybody got a shopsmith lathe screw centre to sell me ?
    By JDarvall in forum HAND TOOLS - POWERED
    Replies: 10
    Last Post: 6th April 2006, 02:33 PM

Tags for this Thread

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •