Thanks: 0
Likes: 0
Needs Pictures: 0
Picture(s) thanks: 0
Results 31 to 36 of 36
-
30th June 2010, 10:44 PM #31Senior Member
- Join Date
- Oct 2008
- Location
- Cairns, Q
- Posts
- 351
.RC.
A Google search comes up with several references to the 4 1/2 morse taper:
Google
There is quite a bit of discussion of 4 1/2 morse tapers in a thread started by Boss429 on PM (General) on 6-19-2007 which also gives MH page number references and taper dimensions. Quoted dimensions were:
"MT 4 1/2 small=1.266 inch, large=1.500 inch, taper=.62400 in/ft
MT 5 small=1.475 inch, large=1.748 inch, taper=.63151 in/ft"
Some of the lathes said to have had a 4 1/2 MT headstock are: Hendey 14", some South Bends, some Clausings including the 5900s, some Sebastians, and 11" Rockwells. I seem to remember reading that some of the Chinese or Taiwanese lathes a few years ago also had 4 1/2 morse headstocks, but cannot remember any names or models.
Apparently the size was introduced because it was the smallest morse taper that could accommodate a 5C collet adapter.There really does seem to be a fair amount of evidence that this was a recognised taper.
franco
-
30th June 2010 10:44 PM # ADSGoogle Adsense Advertisement
- Join Date
- Always
- Location
- Advertising world
- Posts
- Many
-
30th June 2010, 10:51 PM #32Distracted Member
- Join Date
- May 2010
- Location
- Lower Lakes SA
- Age
- 59
- Posts
- 2,557
Dave J, the whole taper is only 40mm long. It doesn't really have a middle to remove! Pipeclay, don't take it personally, but I want to try again to verify what I actually have. I'm scheming to reverse-engineer the method outlined in Woodlee's link. Graziano, that would stick out a fair bit. Could still work though, if the small end is no bigger than about 35. Originally I made mine stick out enough so the tip was flush with the face of the chuck so I could drive off a jaw. Now it's so, um, minimal, I'll have to use the faceplate.
-
1st July 2010, 02:01 PM #33GOLD MEMBER
- Join Date
- Jun 2007
- Location
- sydney
- Age
- 65
- Posts
- 3,566
Im not upset at all,just thought you might like to know what the taper/inch was so you could set your compound without having to jam something in your spindle.
Last edited by pipeclay; 1st July 2010 at 02:04 PM. Reason: wrong dimension
-
1st July 2010, 07:27 PM #34Distracted Member
- Join Date
- May 2010
- Location
- Lower Lakes SA
- Age
- 59
- Posts
- 2,557
Yep, that's great info, thanks pipeclay. But I'll just try to confirm by measurement that's all. Been busy with other stuff today.
-
3rd August 2010, 09:55 PM #35Distracted Member
- Join Date
- May 2010
- Location
- Lower Lakes SA
- Age
- 59
- Posts
- 2,557
Eccentricities (long-winded)
I've spent some time on this over the last few days and I feel I've made some progress, though not as much as I'd like. For those who came in late, I'm attempting to reproduce the taper in my lathe's spindle. It's a size that's hard to find (MT 4.5?). I want to be able to make adaptors to fit various standard tooling. It's become an exercise in error-chasing, and a great learning process.
So I made a plug gauge, with one end fixed (press fit) to a shaft, and the other, exactly one mm larger in diameter, a sliding fit. The idea being to fit this snugly into the taper, mount between centres and set the compound slide from it. Here's a picture of my first attempt to do this.
https://www.woodworkforums.com/attach...1&d=1280832135
And my purpose-built, centre-height indicator holder (not a machined surface on it )
https://www.woodworkforums.com/attach...1&d=1280832135
I used a toolbit as a parallel to run the indicator on. You can see it's only contacting the leading edges of the two diameters. Yes they are rubber bands, and yes, that is a knurl. So I got it dialled spot-on, and cut a taper.
https://www.woodworkforums.com/attach...1&d=1280832292
The result was not flash. Bluing showed all the contact at the small end, and there was a bit of runout too. Closer examination of my plug gauge revealed the small end had a lot of runout, which I still can't really explain. The part was turned at one setting and should have been concentric.
I fudged it by setting it at the average position. This time I ditched the toolbit and just got the indicator riding on the very corner (easy to do actually), pulled the stem back, wound the compound along, and found the same sweet spot on the larger diameter. Again, got it spot on, took another cut.
Here are 2 pics of the blue reading:
https://www.woodworkforums.com/attach...2&d=1280832129
https://www.woodworkforums.com/attach...3&d=1280832129
Not a bad contact area I thought. What's interesting is in the second pic you can see the contact reduces. I got this by rotating the workpiece a full turn, BTW. You may just see a texta dot at the lower left of the workpiece. That marks one of the high points. There are two, about 90 deg apart.
Total indicator readings were .01 at the small end, nearer to .05 at the big end. I took these readings by mounting the piece lightly between centres and turning it by hand, so spindle error was eliminated. I tried it with the part reversed to eliminate my cheap live centre. Same result. Negligible runout at the small end; two oddly spaced lumps on the big end, always at the same spots.
https://www.woodworkforums.com/attach...4&d=1280832129
https://www.woodworkforums.com/attach...5&d=1280832129
Now, I can think of a better way to set the compound: Use a lever type indicator mounted in the toolpost to read directly from the taper. I don't have such an indicator but I think I may very soon (Anyone have one to sell before I get an ebay cheapie? ) However. I don't think the angle is the problem. I think I'm cutting lumpy circles and I don't know why. That's as far as I've got.
Thanks for reading this far. Any thoughts?
-
3rd August 2010, 10:38 PM #36Dave J Guest
Hi Bryan looks like you have been busy, I hope your wife has recovered and is ok
The cheaper dial test indicators work fine, as there not for measuring only comparing. I would recommend you get a micron indicator, especially for this job as you will see more movement in the needle for the same amount, compared a 0.01mm one.
It could be some of your problems at the moment.
Here is a reasonably priced one, he is also on ebay if that suits you but he is a bit dearer on there.
MICRON DIAL TEST INDICATOR #D11
I bought one of his 0.01 test indicators in the link below that come with the small mag base for general use, to save using my more precision and expensive ones. The mag base is useless but the test indicator works fine. Mine has Mitutoyo printed on it, but it is only a copy.
DIAL TEST INDICATOR WITH MAGNETIC BASE #C91
If you have a bit of time there are good quality ones that you can get on ebay for good prices. I have picked up a Mitutoyo 0.001mm indicator for around $35 and Girod test indicator for about $59 etc.
Dave
Similar Threads
-
Dead Centre Size for Hercus Spindle
By wannabe in forum THE HERCUS AREAReplies: 7Last Post: 13th November 2009, 09:52 AM -
centre for spindle bore
By ausdag in forum THE HERCUS AREAReplies: 4Last Post: 15th September 2009, 10:36 PM -
Drive centre for vertical lathe
By jmk89 in forum WOODTURNING - GENERALReplies: 8Last Post: 5th July 2008, 09:00 AM -
Anybody got a shopsmith lathe screw centre to sell me ?
By JDarvall in forum HAND TOOLS - POWEREDReplies: 10Last Post: 6th April 2006, 02:33 PM