Thanks: 0
Needs Pictures: 0
Picture(s) thanks: 0
Results 16 to 29 of 29
-
22nd March 2015, 11:59 AM #16Senior Member
- Join Date
- Oct 2008
- Location
- Cairns, Q
- Posts
- 351
My Chinese 13x40 uses up for forward and has the saddle handwheel on the left. My neighbour's similar but later 12x36 uses down for forward and has the saddle hand wheel on the right. It takes a few minutes to get used to the change when swapping lathes. It's not nearly as confusing as an old small lathe I resurrected from a box of bits for another neighbour though. This one has a right hand thread on the cross slide. You really have to concentrate when cutting up to a shoulder to remember to turn the handle clockwise to withdraw the tool. Fortunately it does not have enough power to destroy itself when you get the almost inevitable dig-in.
Frank.
-
22nd March 2015 11:59 AM # ADSGoogle Adsense Advertisement
- Join Date
- Always
- Location
- Advertising world
- Posts
- Many
-
22nd March 2015, 04:20 PM #17Senior Member
- Join Date
- Apr 2008
- Location
- Perth
- Posts
- 289
Which way
The TAFE Colchesters lathes in WA were "down for forward" "up for reverse". My Chinese lathe is "up for forward" " down for reverse". As for the standards, there has never been any reviews or updates to any of them for a long time. A company called Global owns the right to the standards seal of approval, looking into their website for a paticular standard, well get you truly frustrated, motorcycle helmet laws for one.
DD
-
22nd March 2015, 04:38 PM #18Philomath in training
- Join Date
- Oct 2011
- Location
- Adelaide
- Age
- 59
- Posts
- 3,149
I can't say that there was never one made but I would suggest that for a right handed person the standard lathe is set up so that a good proportion of manipulation of the machine is readily done by the right hand - for example, bringing in and drilling with the tail stock, winding the cross slide, changing tools/ tool post position.
By comparison the left hand just gets to wind the carriage wheel and push buttons/ pull levers.
Micahel
-
22nd March 2015, 05:21 PM #19Senior Member
- Join Date
- Oct 2008
- Location
- Cairns, Q
- Posts
- 351
Not really a new idea - It's a while back, but Henry Maudslay's original screw cutting lathe of 1797 for one had the headstock to the operator's right. Since this was the original, I wonder why nearly all the later designers of conventional lathes did not copy it, but put the headstock on the left? More convenient as Michael suggested? Since the Maudslay lathe was hand driven it might have been easier for a right handed person to crank with the right arm.
http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Fi...7_and_1800.png
Regards,
Frank
-
22nd March 2015, 09:12 PM #20SENIOR MEMBER
- Join Date
- Jun 2004
- Location
- Kyabram. Vic
- Posts
- 826
RayG,
I don't think the Irish make any lathes.
Ken
-
22nd March 2015, 09:20 PM #21Senior Member
- Join Date
- Sep 2008
- Location
- Riddells Creek
- Posts
- 300
[QUOTE=johntopp;1852285]Anyone remember which way the Colchesters in the TAFE's were wired ?
If so I'll make that my standard
That would depend on the model of the Colchester, the instruction manual for a Bantam states that the handle has to be lifted up for forward whereas the Master 2500 manual states down is forward. I work in a Tafe college and have set up all the lathes, no matter what make or model, to run forward when the lever is pushed down.
-
22nd March 2015, 09:42 PM #22SENIOR MEMBER
- Join Date
- Jul 2011
- Location
- Melbourne Australia
- Posts
- 1,128
Down for forward. The handle should at least move in the general direction that the chuck moves. You push the lever down, the spindle should turn down. Why would it be the inverse?
The only thing that pisses me off more, is fork lifts with the side shift way about. It's forward for left, back for right
-
22nd March 2015, 09:45 PM #23GOLD MEMBER
- Join Date
- Jul 2010
- Location
- Melbourne
- Posts
- 7,775
What a stupid question
https://www.woodworkforums.com/f65/ccw-143685
Stuart
-
22nd March 2015, 09:48 PM #24Intermediate Member
- Join Date
- May 2012
- Location
- melbourne
- Posts
- 43
I have decided to unanimously adopt the TAFE standard FWD = Down
Good enough for TAFE is good enough for me
So down for (normally) ON (FWD), and back up to the detent for OFF, just like all the other switches (lights, power points.....) I use
Next job, swap two wires on the drum switch
I'll equate my attempt to adapt to UP = ON with the British move during the war to change over to UP = ON for light switches. Apparently to reduce the risk of a light being turned on accidentally by a nearby bomb blast. The idea never took off.
-
23rd March 2015, 08:47 AM #25Senior Member
- Join Date
- May 2012
- Location
- Melbourne, Victoria
- Posts
- 121
-
23rd March 2015, 08:55 AM #26GOLD MEMBER
- Join Date
- Jul 2006
- Location
- Adelaide
- Posts
- 2,680
-
23rd March 2015, 10:15 AM #27Mechanical Butcher
- Join Date
- Oct 2004
- Location
- Southern Highlands NSW
- Posts
- 920
Helicopter rotors turn in one particular direction, except if they're French.
Jordan
-
23rd March 2015, 11:02 AM #28GOLD MEMBER
- Join Date
- Jul 2010
- Location
- Melbourne
- Posts
- 7,775
-
23rd March 2015, 04:16 PM #29Intermediate Member
- Join Date
- May 2012
- Location
- melbourne
- Posts
- 43
Made the change, Down is FWD, feels so much more intuitive
Thanks for the input folks
Now running on the TAFE standard, the FWD UP never felt right
Very inexpensive lathe upgrade I think
Similar Threads
-
Turning lathe motor from forward to reverse
By Jim Ferrous in forum METALWORK FORUMReplies: 13Last Post: 19th September 2013, 03:34 PM -
VSD/VFD forward reverse remote switching
By eskimo in forum CNC MachinesReplies: 4Last Post: 25th March 2010, 09:36 AM -
Mini Mill/Drill with forward/reverse
By Big Shed in forum METALWORK FORUMReplies: 3Last Post: 27th February 2009, 11:31 PM -
Reverse on a Lathe
By lubbing5cherubs in forum WOODTURNING - GENERALReplies: 19Last Post: 27th March 2007, 11:30 PM