Page 2 of 2 FirstFirst 12
Results 16 to 19 of 19

Thread: Linked belting

  1. #16
    Join Date
    Aug 2007
    Location
    Melbourne
    Age
    68
    Posts
    1,417

    Unhappy

    Quote Originally Posted by Ben Dono View Post
    A guy on youtube called Matthias Wandel just did a review and comparison of v belts vs linked belts. Everything I have seen from his videos has been pretty darn thorough.

    His take on them is that the vibration and noise comes from the normal v belts taking a set when they are left on the smaller pulleys for too long. As you ramp up the speed on them again, that is usually the cause of the problems.
    He got around this by getting a more flexible v belt. Its worth a google.
    My personal experiences with conventional V belts on machine tools are:

    - conventional V belts are spliced. At every pass, the splice causes a "thump". On a lathe, this thump can show on surface finish. Poly-V belts (aka serpentine belts) on the other hand are endless, meaning that they have no splice and therefore no "thump" at each pass.

    - conventional V belts have a memory. They will take a "set" if not used regularly. This set adds to vibration. This is less a problem with V belts that are ribbed on their back. I personally find that the very cheapest V belts take a set much quicker than good quality brand name belts. You get what you pay for. Tthe logos of the two belt makers "Gates" and "Great Wall" do not by accident look confusingly similar, but the products perform in every way very differently. Poly-V belts (aka serpentine belts) do not suffer from "set" even after long periods under tension of not being used.

    - conventional V belts are made with rubber and perish over time. They are also to some degree affected by solvents and oils. In particular the presence of Ozone (Ozone is for generated by the arcing of brushed DC motors) will hasten the time it takes to perish. Poly-V belts are resistant to aging because they are made with Polyurethane.

    - For any sort of machine tool, I do replace conventional V belts with link belts. I use Fenner V belts (from eBay seller Ohioblademan) and have found them to be A LOT quiter. And especially on the lathe to improve surface finish. Even on the humble 6x4 bandsaw I find the link belts run much smoother and no vibrations.

    - In my lathe it would be necessary to remove the spindle to replace the V belt. That in itself is reason enough to upgrade to a link belt, as these can be installed without pulling the spindle.

    - If designing a new drive for a lathe or mill drive conversion, I highly recommend to use Polybelts. I have converted my X3 mill to VFD and polybelt.

    - for tractor implements, I found that in conventional shape V belts it is worth paying extra for Kevlar reinforced belts - these also use the more durable Polyurethane instead of rubber. Last longer and and stretch less. The downside is that cost is about 2-3 times higher than for conventional belts. You always only get what you pay for.

  2. # ADS
    Google Adsense Advertisement
    Join Date
    Always
    Location
    Advertising world
    Age
    2010
    Posts
    Many





     
  3. #17
    Join Date
    Jun 2011
    Location
    Australia east coast
    Age
    71
    Posts
    1,469

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by eskimo View Post
    I am not a big fan of the stuff (prefering cogged type) but thats where Link belting really comes in handy. It can be installed where spindles pulleys etc etc may need to be removed to allow fitment
    The other places linked belt is really handy is on farms and boats. Pretty much anywhere where it's going to be a big PITA to nick down to the local shop only to find they're out of A36 belts. We always used to take 3 or 4m of A section to sea with us. Saved taking a ton of spare belts. PDW

  4. #18
    Join Date
    Nov 2008
    Location
    Perth WA
    Age
    71
    Posts
    5,650

    Default

    I have limited experience with linked belts. I bought one from Transeals to avoid the task of removing the Hercus mill's spindle. The linked belt, when installed, stretched and continued to stretch for the period it was in the mill. I eventually replaced it with a conventional Gates belt. Is stretching a characteristic of these belts or did I buy the wrong brand? BT

  5. #19
    Join Date
    Aug 2007
    Location
    Melbourne
    Age
    68
    Posts
    1,417

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Anorak Bob View Post
    I have limited experience with linked belts. I bought one from Transeals to avoid the task of removing the Hercus mill's spindle. The linked belt, when installed, stretched and continued to stretch for the period it was in the mill. I eventually replaced it with a conventional Gates belt. Is stretching a characteristic of these belts or did I buy the wrong brand? BT
    Bob, yes there is considerable stretching during the first say 10 hours of operation. It can be as much as necessitating the removal of one or several links. In my experince, link belts seem to require less tension than normal V belts. After a while the stretching seems to stop. There is also a "preferred" direction of rotation, albeit they work well in occasional reverse use too, like in a drill press for tapping.

Page 2 of 2 FirstFirst 12

Similar Threads

  1. Flat Belting
    By Oldneweng in forum METALWORK FORUM
    Replies: 3
    Last Post: 26th October 2013, 10:51 PM
  2. Replies: 18
    Last Post: 16th July 2013, 12:20 PM
  3. Flat belting
    By Steamwhisperer in forum METALWORK FORUM
    Replies: 47
    Last Post: 25th September 2012, 01:28 PM
  4. flat belting .... ?
    By morrisman in forum METALWORK FORUM
    Replies: 24
    Last Post: 3rd February 2012, 09:53 PM
  5. Good quality linked chain for jewellery boxes
    By Barry F in forum WOODWORK - GENERAL
    Replies: 4
    Last Post: 13th December 2005, 04:38 PM

Tags for this Thread

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •