Page 2 of 2 FirstFirst 12
Results 16 to 28 of 28
  1. #16
    Join Date
    Sep 2007
    Location
    Newcastle NSW
    Age
    77
    Posts
    155

    Default Lathe leveling

    Hello Peter Befuddled,
    If your lathe is the same as the one in the photo there does not appear to be very much clearance between the forward/reverse shaft and the swarf tray. My lathe had the same problem which made it difficult to remove the swarf.
    After putting up with the problem for years I mounted the lathe headstock on a block of 50mm thick high density polyetheylene (I think that's what it is called). The tailstock end is supported on two pieces of 1/2" UNF threaded rod. This setup made it simple to align the bed. After it was set up I made a tapered wedge block from two pieces of Tallow wood which fits under the tailstock end in the space between the two alignment rods. The two tapered pieces of wood are drawn together by two rods so that the block fits firmly to prevent any vibration. The system seems to work well.
    Good luck with your setting up
    Russell

  2. # ADS
    Google Adsense Advertisement
    Join Date
    Always
    Location
    Advertising world
    Age
    2010
    Posts
    Many





     
  3. #17
    Join Date
    Jul 2010
    Location
    Melbourne
    Posts
    7,775

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Bryan View Post
    Do you mean this one?
    Yes

    Quote Originally Posted by Bryan View Post
    If so a simple test cut should suffice? Chuck a piece of bar, large enough to be self-supporting for, well the longer the better, but say 8 or 10 inches. Take a light cut along its length using a sharp tool and a fine feed. Measure the diameter with a micrometer at various points, eg every 25mm. Write down the results. Better yet, graph them. This can be the baseline for future reference. See also 'two collar method' (search term).
    And when its not parallel....(which it almost certainly wont be*)......... whats the problem?

    Stuart

    *I guess you could get lucky have have it cut parallel.. but that doesn't mean all is good

  4. #18
    Join Date
    May 2010
    Location
    Lower Lakes SA
    Age
    58
    Posts
    2,557

    Default

    Stu, I added a PS to say the same thing, but I think it's still worth knowing what it's doing.
    After all the question was essentially, 'how inaccurate is my lathe?'

  5. #19
    Join Date
    Apr 2014
    Location
    Sunny Australia
    Posts
    21

    Default DRO level?

    Just going through options today, anyone able to comment on this little jigger I came across on the Grizzly site?

    T24791 iGaging Digital Laser Level, 0.05 Deg. Resolution. 0-48" Range

    just thinking it might be easier to read.

    cheers, Peter

  6. #20
    Join Date
    Apr 2014
    Location
    Sunny Australia
    Posts
    21

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by rusty steel View Post
    Hello Peter Befuddled,
    If your lathe is the same as the one in the photo there does not appear to be very much clearance between the forward/reverse shaft and the swarf tray. My lathe had the same problem which made it difficult to remove the swarf.
    After putting up with the problem for years I mounted the lathe headstock on a block of 50mm thick high density polyetheylene (I think that's what it is called). The tailstock end is supported on two pieces of 1/2" UNF threaded rod. This setup made it simple to align the bed. After it was set up I made a tapered wedge block from two pieces of Tallow wood which fits under the tailstock end in the space between the two alignment rods. The two tapered pieces of wood are drawn together by two rods so that the block fits firmly to prevent any vibration. The system seems to work well.
    Good luck with your setting up
    Russell

    Thanks Russell, that suggestion would also allow me to repair a bend in the tray where the DPO swapped out the 240v motor and did a bodge workaround where the terminal box of the new motor fouled the catch tray.
    I had thought of adding a sump there but your suggestion of packing up would solve that clearance problem as well.

    Cheeers, Peter
    Last edited by befuddled; 19th April 2014 at 01:38 PM. Reason: Poor English

  7. #21
    Join Date
    Jul 2010
    Location
    Melbourne
    Posts
    7,775

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by befuddled View Post
    anyone able to comment on this little jigger I came across on the Grizzly site?

    T24791 iGaging Digital Laser Level, 0.05 Deg. Resolution. 0-48" Range

    just thinking it might be easier to read.
    My math says 0.05degree is around 0.01" per 10"... but I wouldn't trust it.. anyone want to check it?

    If I'm right the level below would be off scale before the level above has moved 0.05deg.
    http://www.grizzly.com/products/Mast...-Per-10-/H2682

    I know which one I'd use.

    But it does depend exactly what you are trying to achieve. As I think Bryan and I are coming at it from different directions

    Stuart

  8. #22
    Join Date
    Jan 2011
    Location
    Far West Wimmera
    Age
    63
    Posts
    2,765

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Stustoys View Post
    My math says 0.05degree is around 0.01" per 10"... but I wouldn't trust it.. anyone want to check it?

    If I'm right the level below would be off scale before the level above has moved 0.05deg.
    http://www.grizzly.com/products/Mast...-Per-10-/H2682

    I know which one I'd use.

    But it does depend exactly what you are trying to achieve. As I think Bryan and I are coming at it from different directions

    Stuart
    I have an iGaging digital laser level. It is 8inches long. I am not sure of the resolution, but I found it to be accurate to about 4 or 5 inches over 20 ft. I was not overly impressed. One day I am going to check it to see if it matches the specs. I was using it to lay horizontal stormwater pipe.

    Dean

  9. #23
    Join Date
    May 2010
    Location
    Lower Lakes SA
    Age
    58
    Posts
    2,557

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by befuddled View Post
    T24791 iGaging Digital Laser Level, 0.05 Deg. Resolution. 0-48" Range

    just thinking it might be easier to read.

    cheers, Peter
    Quote Originally Posted by Stustoys View Post
    My math says 0.05degree is around 0.01" per 10"... but I wouldn't trust it.. anyone want to check it?
    .05 deg would be 3 minutes which is 180 seconds.
    The coarsest 'machinist's level' is 85 arc seconds per division.
    The one in Stu's link is 10 seconds.
    The finest one I've seen is 4 seconds.

    I think you need a coarse one to get you in the ballpark and a fine one to finish. How coarse and fine is up to you. I have an 85 and a 4, but a 10 would be fine enough I think.

    But it does depend exactly what you are trying to achieve. As I think Bryan and I are coming at it from different directions
    That's why these leveling/alignment threads are always so much fun.
    Anyone want to take bets on how many posts till someone raises the curvature of the earth?

  10. #24
    Ueee's Avatar
    Ueee is offline Blacksmith, Cabinetmaker, Machinist, Messmaker
    Join Date
    Dec 2011
    Location
    Canberra
    Age
    39
    Posts
    4,467

    Default

    Hi Peter,
    A level like this is more than enough for what you want to do http://www.ctctools.biz/servlet/the-...MACHINE/Detail . Use a carpenters level first to get you in the ballpark or you will be chasing your tail for ages.

    You also have to consider the curvature of the earth as it will effect your results over the length of your lathe, and then of course there is the problems with gravity effecting your level if you have any objects of large mass in the room.......

    Ew
    1915 17"x50" LeBlond heavy duty Lathe, 24" Queen city shaper, 1970's G Vernier FV.3.TO Universal Mill, 1958 Blohm HFS 6 surface grinder, 1942 Rivett 715 Lathe, 14"x40" Antrac Lathe, Startrite H225 Bandsaw, 1949 Hercus Camelback Drill press, 1947 Holbrook C10 Lathe.

  11. #25
    Join Date
    Jan 2011
    Location
    Far West Wimmera
    Age
    63
    Posts
    2,765

    Default

    Whether or not to consider the curvature of the earth is dependant on the methods used. A surveyor will take it into consideration, whereas an engineer won't. An engineer would have already taken measures to counteract it when he laid the floor, based on the figures supplied by the surveyor.

    Dean

  12. #26
    Join Date
    May 2010
    Location
    Lower Lakes SA
    Age
    58
    Posts
    2,557

    Default

    Are we helping yet?

  13. #27
    Join Date
    Apr 2014
    Location
    Sunny Australia
    Posts
    21

    Default

    Yep, I just need to get clear of Vegas so I can arrange my lathe and mill DRO from amazon via anytime tools, and the level and magnetic dial gauge from Grizzly. Goin gun shooting tomorrow so the gunsmith lathe manual could be handy.

    Cheers, Peter

  14. #28
    Join Date
    Jul 2006
    Location
    Adelaide
    Posts
    2,680

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Bryan View Post
    Are we helping yet?
    geez...glad I got mine done while you lot were not so worried about curvature of the earth, whether one has to be an engineer or surveyor and then that crap about degrees minutes seconds and arc's
    ruddy hell guys.....lol

Page 2 of 2 FirstFirst 12

Similar Threads

  1. Newbie with a question..
    By StuBerger in forum ROUTING FORUM
    Replies: 6
    Last Post: 15th December 2013, 08:09 AM
  2. Newbie Question
    By cava in forum WOODWORK - GENERAL
    Replies: 21
    Last Post: 18th December 2010, 04:23 AM
  3. Newbie Question
    By BALDAGGIO in forum WOODWORK - GENERAL
    Replies: 4
    Last Post: 2nd July 2008, 08:34 PM
  4. another newbie question
    By dmassey31 in forum WOODTURNING - PEN TURNING
    Replies: 6
    Last Post: 30th October 2006, 11:41 PM
  5. Newbie Question
    By smidsy in forum FINISHING
    Replies: 4
    Last Post: 18th June 2004, 11:17 AM

Tags for this Thread

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •