Thanks: 0
Needs Pictures: 0
Picture(s) thanks: 0
Results 46 to 60 of 227
Thread: Rotary Table questons
-
2nd April 2011, 02:10 PM #46SENIOR MEMBER
- Join Date
- Oct 2007
- Location
- Sydney
- Posts
- 2,340
I had to take a heap of cast off a backplate a few weeks back and it goes everywhere. The difference between steel and CI is the latter forms grainy type swarf, a bit like sand, whereas steel is quite different. However the Hercus saddle is very easy to strip, and I figured after a year or so since it was last off it wasn't a bad idea to get it off and cleaned properly regardless. Having said that, the way wipers (new) seemed to do their jobs well and to be honest there wasn't any CI past them. Plenty of other places though, so I concluded putting things across the ways certainly wasn't going to do any harm ... well unless it got caught in the chuck However it was possibly more psychological than anything and more crap was going into the other nooks and crannies if that's what one is concerned about.
As far as refusing to use CI because of this trait. Well I'm about as anal a person as you're likely to be unfortunate enough to meet, yet even I have to face the fact that at the end of the day these are tools, and not something to hang on the wall. So as much as I try to take very good care of my tools, at the end of the day they're TOOLS, hence WILL get worn, scratched, and dinged. I cringe when I see it, but don't lose any sleep over it just the same, simply to to take reasonable measures to prevent it and move on with enjoying using them.
Pete
-
2nd April 2011 02:10 PM # ADSGoogle Adsense Advertisement
- Join Date
- Always
- Location
- Advertising world
- Posts
- Many
-
2nd April 2011, 02:30 PM #47GOLD MEMBER
- Join Date
- Jul 2010
- Location
- Melbourne
- Posts
- 7,775
I'll give it a go. If it doesn't work I don't have to use it.
Machining the camloc taper. My idea ATM is to rough the face down, turn the taper down until the chuck it loose on the taper then machine the face down until everything fits. Rather than machining the face then trying to get the taper spot on taking tiny cuts.
Here the a picture of the way covers now, I've added a vacuum cleaner which as far as I can tell stop almost all the fine dust.
Stuart
-
2nd April 2011, 02:39 PM #48GOLD MEMBER
- Join Date
- Jul 2010
- Location
- Melbourne
- Posts
- 7,775
PeteF,
The book I read said with felt wipers to take them off. Mine are plastic. But I agree with you, if you get to out of shape about wearing the machine out you're not going to use it and then it may as well be in the tip anyway.
To add a little story about wipers, I was cleaning the felt wipers off my shaper and was wondering if they was clean enough yet, then I picked one up with a magnet. I think they might need some more cleaning yet hehe
Stuart
-
2nd April 2011, 02:45 PM #49Dave J Guest
It doesn't matter which way you go about it, remember to under cut between the taper and the face when your finished.
You had better not let your wife see that job, or you will be wrapping the roast and doing the vacuuming.lol
Dave
-
2nd April 2011, 02:47 PM #50Dave J Guest
-
2nd April 2011, 02:59 PM #51SENIOR MEMBER
- Join Date
- Oct 2007
- Location
- Sydney
- Posts
- 2,340
The book said to take the wipers off before machining CI? That seems bizarre to me. As I said, I did quite a lot of machining of this particular plate, and no CI got past the wipers, so I don't know why they would suggest that. I was really curious so had a good look at what got where. However in lieu of taking the saddle off, I would definitely take the wipers off AFTER machining and give them a really good clean. Mind you, as mentioned, my wipers were new and were functioning as designed, but the worst that one could expect if they were stuffed is that some CI would get past them ... in which case you're no worse off than if they weren't there I can't see the logic in what the book was saying, did they say why?
Pete
-
2nd April 2011, 03:14 PM #52GOLD MEMBER
- Join Date
- Jul 2010
- Location
- Melbourne
- Posts
- 7,775
PeteF,
I think the same book wanted you to wipe all the oil off the ways before you started. I'll see if I can find which book it was late today.
Dave,
I have some more felt I might just make some new ones
Isn't the amount you machine off the taper to move the chuck back 0.1mm way less that 0.1mm?
Stuart
-
2nd April 2011, 03:22 PM #53SENIOR MEMBER
- Join Date
- Oct 2007
- Location
- Sydney
- Posts
- 2,340
Yeah cheers for that, I'm keen to know as I could have a copy here too. From what you've said I can see what they're aiming for but I'm afraid I can't follow their logic. So a lathe that only ever machined CI would never have its ways lubed! Wonder how long that would last! I think what you're doing makes the best sense to me; try to prevent the CI swarf getting in to places as best you can. Once you're done with it, get all you can back out again. Otherwise it's still just a lathe, and the same metal "bits" are still rubbing on the other metal bits and still need lubrication!
Pete
-
2nd April 2011, 04:05 PM #54Dave J Guest
For every 2 thou (0.0508 diameter) off the taper, you will need to move the the face back 0.0081 thou (0.2057mm)
The angle is 7.125 deg
The large end of the taper should be 2.500 thou (63.5mm) and it should stand out 0.4375 thou (11.11mm) off the face.
Dave
-
2nd April 2011, 04:33 PM #55GOLD MEMBER
- Join Date
- Jul 2010
- Location
- Melbourne
- Posts
- 7,775
I've had a quick look Pete, can't find it, I'll look in a few others later.(sure hope I'm not making it up)
Thanks Dave. Should be easier to get a better fit machining the face second then
Have just cut the extra 15mm in the bandsaw, about 8 minutes a cut, best money I ever spent.
Stuart
-
2nd April 2011, 04:39 PM #56GOLD MEMBER
- Join Date
- Jun 2007
- Location
- sydney
- Age
- 65
- Posts
- 3,566
Your finish on your piece earlier in the 3 jaw looked a little rough,what were the parameters.
-
2nd April 2011, 05:07 PM #57SENIOR MEMBER
- Join Date
- Oct 2007
- Location
- Sydney
- Posts
- 2,340
Don't go to any trouble Stuart, I'm sure you're not dreaming it up and I can see what they're getting at. However it personally won't change my own personal opinion and that's to cover then clean, otherwise operate the lathe normally. Of course keep in mind that's not based on years of experience; I sure as heck haven't written a book and undoubtedly never will, and is nothing more than my own humble opinion.
Pete
-
2nd April 2011, 05:29 PM #58GOLD MEMBER
- Join Date
- Jul 2010
- Location
- Melbourne
- Posts
- 7,775
pc,
You could be right , I think it looks worse than it is though. I can get a better looking finish feeding faster but it feels worse. I'll go get my numbers, but I'm pretty sure you wont like them
Happy to try something else though.
I've set the compound to the camloc, its within a couple of 10ths.
Stuart
-
2nd April 2011, 05:43 PM #59GOLD MEMBER
- Join Date
- Jul 2010
- Location
- Melbourne
- Posts
- 7,775
Ok here goes, 640rpm, and feeding as slow as it goes. 0.017mm cross and 0.079mm long.
Stuart
-
2nd April 2011, 05:52 PM #60SENIOR MEMBER
- Join Date
- Oct 2007
- Location
- Sydney
- Posts
- 2,340
What tool were you using Stuart? I finished up switching to HSS and had much better results than the carbide I started with.
Pete
Similar Threads
-
Vertex Rotary Table
By Stustoys in forum METALWORK FORUMReplies: 11Last Post: 16th March 2011, 12:54 PM -
Setting up a rotary table
By mav_walrus in forum METALWORK FORUMReplies: 21Last Post: 25th December 2010, 06:59 AM -
Which rotary table??
By xr6t in forum METALWORK FORUMReplies: 20Last Post: 5th March 2010, 09:22 AM -
Rotary Table
By graemet in forum METALWORK FORUMReplies: 26Last Post: 8th October 2008, 09:34 AM -
Rotary table
By graemet in forum METALWORK FORUMReplies: 0Last Post: 6th April 2008, 09:50 PM