Thanks: 0
Likes: 0
Needs Pictures: 0
Picture(s) thanks: 0
Results 1 to 15 of 21
Thread: runout test
-
14th October 2011, 04:10 PM #1
runout test
I have this precision ground bar from an old printer . I dialed it in the 4 jaw and moved the DTI 350mm down and it still exhibits zero runout ..is that good ? What can I do next to check the two spindles for height ? MIKE
-
14th October 2011 04:10 PM # ADSGoogle Adsense Advertisement
- Join Date
- Always
- Location
- Advertising world
- Posts
- Many
-
14th October 2011, 04:16 PM #2
pics
forgot the pics
-
14th October 2011, 04:17 PM #3Dave J Guest
Hi Mike,
We where only just talking about this the other day, I think it is in Bryan's lathe thread.
Dave
-
14th October 2011, 04:19 PM #4GOLD MEMBER
- Join Date
- Jun 2007
- Location
- sydney
- Age
- 64
- Posts
- 3,566
Not sure was the dial touching.
Put a centre in the headstock and tailstock,bring then together with a thin piece of metal between the points,check if the material is visually vertical,then place material in the horizontal and visually check,dont apply too much pressure to the material,a nice 6" rule would be a good choice of material to start with,around .030".
-
14th October 2011, 04:26 PM #5
centres
Yes the dial is touching .... I will try a steel rule with pipeclays suggestion , see if it wobbles out of alignment in either plane . I've also read somewhere ,you can use a razorblade for the same purpose .Mike
-
14th October 2011, 04:30 PM #6GOLD MEMBER
- Join Date
- Jun 2007
- Location
- sydney
- Age
- 64
- Posts
- 3,566
Use anything which is thin but will not bend under its own weight.
If its to thick it wont give you a true indication.
-
14th October 2011, 04:32 PM #7
Hi Mike,
Not entirely convinced your test is valid.
You will always get zero run out with a 4 jaw... (provided you adjusted it for zero run-out of course)
Then if you bring that up to the tailstock, you will always get zero runout close to the tailstock. Provided that the tailstock is somewhere near coaxial with the spindle center, and the material can flex (even slightly)
Try pipeclay's test with a thin sheet of metal to see how close your centers are to being aligned.
Check if the bar is flexing by measuring run out somewhere in the middle, measuresidewayshorizontal, rather than vertical, as it will probably be flexing down under it's own weight a little... A bigger diameter test bar would be nice..
Regards
Ray
-
14th October 2011, 04:32 PM #8GOLD MEMBER
- Join Date
- Jul 2010
- Location
- Melbourne
- Posts
- 7,775
MM as I see that test doesn't show alignment of either spindle. If you moved the tail stock over 1/8" it would just bend the bar and would still indicate running true.
If you had the indictor on the carriage, and moved the carriage from one and to the other, that would tell you something.
Stuart
-
14th October 2011, 04:36 PM #9
Hi Stuart,
That's a record, crossposted twice in two days, saying the same thing again, we must be in sync or something, your not psychic are you?
Regards
Ray
-
14th October 2011, 04:38 PM #10GOLD MEMBER
- Join Date
- Jul 2010
- Location
- Melbourne
- Posts
- 7,775
-
14th October 2011, 05:00 PM #11
roger that
Ok I will try that
Right, just did Stuarts test ..yep there was a definate deflection as I ran the carriage up the test bar ..getting worse towards the tailstock... 7 thou going on to 10 as it neared the end . Thankfully the tailstock has a adjustment there to compensate . I moved it over and its much better now ..about .001 . The tailstock quill is worn and it wobbles about 4 thou side to side ..so I'm guessing to some degree . Also the bar is thin but its the best Ive got right now .thanks
-
14th October 2011, 05:00 PM #12
Some people think I'm psycho... but, both times I've beat you by a few seconds, so that means you must be the one with the psychic abilities, either that or I type faster...
Sorry Mike for the slight off-topic diversion, the short version is that Stuart and I are both sceptical of the metrological basis for the method you are using..
Regards
RayLast edited by RayG; 14th October 2011 at 05:11 PM. Reason: corrected metrology to metrological
-
14th October 2011, 05:37 PM #13
-
14th October 2011, 07:07 PM #14Distracted Member
- Join Date
- May 2010
- Location
- Lower Lakes SA
- Age
- 58
- Posts
- 2,557
Mike, one problem with traversing the indicator along the bar as you have is that if there is any height error in the tailstock (likely) it will throw your reading out. The skinnier your bar, the more error you'll get.
-
14th October 2011, 07:28 PM #15GOLD MEMBER
- Join Date
- Jun 2007
- Location
- sydney
- Age
- 64
- Posts
- 3,566
Mike have you checked to see how it cuts.
Normally after leveling the base,i machine a piece of 1", to 1 1/4" bar around 6" long set in 4 jaw,check size.
I then centre drill the same piece,set in 3 jaw,machine and check size.
I then try a smilar cut on a the length between centres check sizes.
Then I concern my self with adjustments.
Similar Threads
-
Precision Test Bar Runout
By 19brendan81 in forum METALWORK FORUMReplies: 23Last Post: 19th September 2011, 02:18 PM -
TOS Chuck Runout
By Anorak Bob in forum METALWORK FORUMReplies: 17Last Post: 7th March 2011, 03:01 PM -
GMC runout sale
By Tools in forum HAND TOOLS - POWEREDReplies: 1Last Post: 30th April 2008, 08:54 PM -
Collet runout
By dunnp in forum ROUTING FORUMReplies: 1Last Post: 16th March 2007, 03:09 PM -
Measuring runout
By chris_hewett in forum HAND TOOLS - POWEREDReplies: 9Last Post: 15th August 2003, 11:51 PM